Originally Posted by davidmcn:
“It isn't the case. It may be an added selling point that a warranty is insurance-backed, but there's no legal requirement for it to be so.”
Whilst it is true there is no legal obligation to insurance back extended warranties, the customer should be made fully aware if the scheme isn't underwritten, which is often the reason that some warranties are far cheaper than others.
RS aren't slow to highlight the low cost of their warranties, I suspect they are slightly less keen to highlight HOW they've been made less expensive (although it is on the website).
The problem, which Nigel Goodwin has correctly pointed out, is that a few years ago, in quick succession there were the failures of Tempo, Tiny and Time. All had sold extended warranties, none were underwritten leaving customers out of pocket.
Whilst DSG often get criticised on these boards, to give them credit, as far back as 1988 their extended warranties WERE insurance backed. Had the company failed for any reason the customers would still have been covered.