|
||||||||
BBC2's You're Fired! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
|
BBC2's You're Fired!
Karren Brady knows who the finallists are, so why is it ok for her to comment on the candidates? She said towards the end of the show: "I think Jim is one to watch." Well he clearly didn't get to the final then, or she'd be accused of spoiling the outcome. And when there was a debate about certain candidates, she kept quiet. Another sure-fire sign that she knows something that we don't. Stop ruining it for those of us who don't like spoilers!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 193
|
Why does she appear on this show in view of what she already knows?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 13,496
|
Quote:
Why does she appear on this show in view of what she already knows?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 12,318
|
I see nothing wrong with Nick and Karen being on the show. As long as they don't pretened they don't know, or give spoliers away like "I think Jim is one to watch".
![]() I'm sure Jim does not win because I dont think Karen is that silly, but it is still a spoiler I would rather not know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,281
|
Quote:
Karren Brady knows who the finallists are, so why is it ok for her to comment on the candidates? She said towards the end of the show: "I think Jim is one to watch." Well he clearly didn't get to the final then, or she'd be accused of spoiling the outcome. And when there was a debate about certain candidates, she kept quiet. Another sure-fire sign that she knows something that we don't. Stop ruining it for those of us who don't like spoilers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: On Chrissie Watts parole board
Posts: 950
|
Karen said that Stella was "one to watch", last year. It's just an opinion. It could go either way to be honest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
|
I do like Karren, and i usually agree with what she has to say, but her telling us that Jim is one to watch means he's not going to win. I remember early in Series 2 when Lord Sugar - back when he was just plain old Sir Alan - was cheekily asked by Jonathan Ross who he thought would win. Sir Alan jokingly answered: "Syed". My friend then went out and blabbed that he knew who was going to win the show that year. As if Sir Alan would actually announce who had won the show. My friend looked rather sheepish when Syed only came 5th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Karen said that Stella was "one to watch", last year. It's just an opinion. It could go either way to be honest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,281
|
Quote:
I do like Karren, and i usually agree with what she has to say, but her telling us that Jim is one to watch means he's not going to win. I remember early in Series 2 when Lord Sugar - back when he was just plain old Sir Alan - was cheekily asked by Jonathan Ross who he thought would win. Sir Alan jokingly answered: "Syed". My friend then went out and blabbed that he knew who was going to win the show that year. As if Sir Alan would actually announce who had won the show. My friend looked rather sheepish when Syed only came 5th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 381
|
i see nothing wrong with them being on the show but i agree she shouldn't make comments like that. i think Jim will go far and dont think shes bluffing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28,296
|
What did Jane Moore just say? That women always win?! OOhh, i don't like that if that is what she said!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
|
wow, how unprofessional were Natasha and Zoe (The who? twins) slagging each other off. I can safely rule them out from winning after seeing that. Sugar wouldn't be impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,310
|
Quote:
wow, how unprofessional were Natasha and Zoe (The who? twins) slagging each other off. I can safely rule them out from winning after seeing that. Sugar wouldn't be impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 8,407
|
Well, afaik, You're Fired isn't live, so if she did let something slip they'd be sure to edit it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,473
|
Quote:
Yeah that was silly; even more bizarre seeing as we haven't seen them not getting on (or indeed even talking much) in the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,310
|
Quote:
Theres still a lot of candidates though and only 30 minutes of the task so its not suprising a lot isn't seen.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Heaven
Posts: 2,883
|
Quote:
Why does she appear on this show in view of what she already knows?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26.



