|
||||||||
Why don't people understand this is a REALITY TV game show? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,304
|
Why don't people understand this is a REALITY TV game show?
I'm always baffled by The Apprentice in that viewers seem to take it deadly seriously.
This forum demonstrates it - many viewers/posters are horrified by how useless/hillarious the contestants are. Of course they're terrible, they've been picked because they're awful.... Time and time and again I hear people complain, stating: "How are these the best business people in country!?"...they're not. It's a TV show... Why do we think it is that The Apprentice seems not to have the same connotations as other TV shows? Why do viewers honestly think The Apprentice is anything but a reality TV GAME show? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,214
|
Quote:
I'm always baffled by The Apprentice in that viewers seem to take it deadly seriously.
This forum demonstrates it - many viewers/posters are horrified by how useless/hillarious the contestants are. Of course they're terrible, they've been picked because they're awful.... Time and time and again I hear people complain, stating: "How are these the best business people in country!?"...they're not. It's a TV show... Why do we think it is that The Apprentice seems not to have the same connotations as other TV shows? Why do viewers honestly think The Apprentice is anything but a reality TV GAME show? It is reality in the sense we get to see them performing tasks, but it is not a true reality show in that we don't really get to know or see them outside of doing their tasks or in the board room, other than brief snippets of them getting dressed, then relaxing. And it's a job you get at the end, or in this case, a business owner - that is very very real, but to call it a game show really demeans the spirit of the show itself This show has been popular with many, particularly those who don't get into the shows like Big Brother or the jungle shows, and tends to carry an older viewing crowd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,177
|
I wish The Apprentice could be more like Junior Apprentice - I think it is much more sensible. Is that just because younger people take it all more seriously, or is it planned and edited in a different way - I wonder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 306
|
I also completely disagree. I think the audition process for Apprentice is designed especially to try and weed out the TV wannabe's, and does focus a lot more on what the candidates have achieved in their carears or businessess.
It's for that very reason that when they do cock up so royally, that it is so entertaining. The only thing that makes it "T.V" and not real, is that in the real world you wouldn't be lumped with a bunch of strangers doing things you have absolutely no experience of, (like making soup, or buying fruit and veg at Covent Garden,) at the drop of a top hat (pardon the pun.) You would also have access to the internet, which would have made this weeks task a million times easier, and more realistic, but not nearly so entertaining. Yes, it's entertainment, but it is also very real to most of the candidates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,998
|
i agree and disagree
i think that it would be naive to think that tv bosses wouldn't try and bring in some entertainment from the tv wannabe's. after all it is a TV SHOW. other than that i think that it does hold more credibility than other reality tv shows |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,304
|
Quote:
I also completely disagree. I think the audition process for Apprentice is designed especially to try and weed out the TV wannabe's, and does focus a lot more on what the candidates have achieved in their carears or businessess.
I just think to actually believe that The Apprentice is a serious show about finding the best business person is like thinking Come Dine With Me is a genuine show to find the best dinner host.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 803
|
IMO the tasks are very similar to 'team building' exercises, popular with many large companies.
The idea is not actually to achieve some hypothetical task, which is always very artificial, but merely to discover how people perform - how they relate to others on a stressful task - who is the natural leader. Individuals are very different, and this program does sort people out; and it's fun for us onlookers to watch that happening. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
I wish The Apprentice could be more like Junior Apprentice - I think it is much more sensible. Is that just because younger people take it all more seriously, or is it planned and edited in a different way - I wonder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tartu, Estonia
Posts: 2,166
|
Quote:
Time and time and again I hear people complain, stating: "How are these the best business people in country!?"...they're not. It's a TV show...
Here are two direct quotes from the first two episodes: "It's the business deal of the decade. To fight for it, Britain's entrepreneurial elite head for London." "Heading to London, 16 of Britain's entrepreneurial elite keen to start a company." Given that the voiceover man tells a complete lie, this confuses people. Some may say it's not lying, it's make-believe television. Whatever your feelings about this, the fact remains that the things we are told and shown are simply not true. I will end with a quote from Nick Hewer himself in his interview with the Guardian recently: "Are the apprentices the smartest, most brilliant people in the whole world?...No. The joy of The Apprentice is that the bloke on a squashy sofa in Rotherham with a can of Stella can quite correctly say he could do better. If you want the most brilliant business apprentices in the world, go to Insead or Harvard or Seattle." It's a sham, but an entertaining one. Well it used to be, now it's getting a bit samey. I doubt that Alan Sugar ever wanted or needed any apprentices in his life, it's just a vehicle to promote himself and his business. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,177
|
Quote:
I don't see much difference between the two. They both do daft things . Can you expand on why you think its more sensible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,304
|
Quote:
Whilst you and I may understand this, there is a very good reason why a lot of people think they are the best business people in the country. The programme explicitly says they are.
Here are two direct quotes from the first two episodes: "It's the business deal of the decade. To fight for it, Britain's entrepreneurial elite head for London." "Heading to London, 16 of Britain's entrepreneurial elite keen to start a company." Given that the voiceover man tells a complete lie, this confuses people. Some may say it's not lying, it's make-believe television. Whatever your feelings about this, the fact remains that the things we are told and shown are simply not true. I will end with a quote from Nick Hewer himself in his interview with the Guardian recently: "Are the apprentices the smartest, most brilliant people in the whole world?...No. The joy of The Apprentice is that the bloke on a squashy sofa in Rotherham with a can of Stella can quite correctly say he could do better. If you want the most brilliant business apprentices in the world, go to Insead or Harvard or Seattle." It's a sham, but an entertaining one. Well it used to be, now it's getting a bit samey. I doubt that Alan Sugar ever wanted or needed any apprentices in his life, it's just a vehicle to promote himself and his business. And thanks for the link to The Guardian article. I know that the show itself perpetuates that these are 'the business elite', but I still get a little annoyed when the majority of people I know actually buy it. I think it actually damages business in a way to have these 'Big Brother wannabes' (of which there seems to be becoming more each season) presented as being 'the best'. I personally have heard people comment on how all Management university graduates must be useless because of some of the contestants on this show |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
|
Quote:
Sorry, maybe I should have said the contestants in the junior one seem on the whole to have much more common sense. Just wonder if that is really the case and the juniors take it more seriously, or if the "adult" one is edited to bring out more of the stupidity in everyone?
Though you may have a point in the editors being kinder to the kids. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,177
|
Quote:
The junior show started with far fewer candidates. It was like dropping into the grownups show half way through - ie when most of the out-and-out muppets have been given the finger of doom by Lord Sid. So perhaps the comedy candidates just weren't recruited for JA?
Though you may have a point in the editors being kinder to the kids. ![]() ![]() ![]() (*does dirty laugh*) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Of course they're terrible, they've been picked because they're awful....
Quote:
Sorry, maybe I should have said the contestants in the junior one seem on the whole to have much more common sense. Just wonder if that is really the case and the juniors take it more seriously, or if the "adult" one is edited to bring out more of the stupidity in everyone?
I expect Junior puts less pressure on the candidates because they are younger, and it's a shorter show. Another issue, which fired PMs have been pointing out, is that being leader is harder in the show because you don't have control over salaries or firing, like the boss in a real business would. The PM doesn't have much real power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 18,113
|
Quote:
Whilst you and I may understand this, there is a very good reason why a lot of people think they are the best business people in the country. The programme explicitly says they are.
Here are two direct quotes from the first two episodes: "It's the business deal of the decade. To fight for it, Britain's entrepreneurial elite head for London." "Heading to London, 16 of Britain's entrepreneurial elite keen to start a company." Given that the voiceover man tells a complete lie, this confuses people. Some may say it's not lying, it's make-believe television. Whatever your feelings about this, the fact remains that the things we are told and shown are simply not true. I will end with a quote from Nick Hewer himself in his interview with the Guardian recently: "Are the apprentices the smartest, most brilliant people in the whole world?...No. The joy of The Apprentice is that the bloke on a squashy sofa in Rotherham with a can of Stella can quite correctly say he could do better. If you want the most brilliant business apprentices in the world, go to Insead or Harvard or Seattle." It's a sham, but an entertaining one. Well it used to be, now it's getting a bit samey. I doubt that Alan Sugar ever wanted or needed any apprentices in his life, it's just a vehicle to promote himself and his business. ![]() Some people even think the boardroom is real |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,646
|
You even get the "fly under the radar and hope not to get noticed" style that used to be employed by some BB housemates.
I am of course talking about Melody, on last week's show, after being called back to the boardroom, she did not utter one word, just a couple shots of her... with nothing to say... nothing to contribute Lord Sugar should look for the 'quiet' ones, and if they haven't pitched up and shown what they are capable of, within three weeks... guess what.... you're fired !!
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: cardiff
Posts: 12,557
|
Theres a couple of wild cards thrown in for lolz like the accountant who had no clue how to manage and the eccentric inventor, but the others are all successful in their chosen fields.
Of course they wont be the best as the best would be taking big pay cuts if they win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
|
Quote:
You even get the "fly under the radar and hope not to get noticed" style that used to be employed by some BB housemates.
I am of course talking about Melody, on last week's show, after being called back to the boardroom, she did not utter one word, just a couple shots of her... with nothing to say... nothing to contribute Lord Sugar should look for the 'quiet' ones, and if they haven't pitched up and shown what they are capable of, within three weeks... guess what.... you're fired !! ![]() Just like in Big Brother you have to remember its edited - we only see what the producers want us to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 34
|
Getting a bit bored of all the boardroom arguing. We have seen it all before now.
I sincerely hope these are not the best business people in the country... The best of the best would not need to go on the show in the first place, so thankfully, there must be better out there. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03.



And thanks for the link to The Guardian article. 
