DS Forums

 
 

None of them.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26-05-2011, 11:09
hiawatha
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 999

So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.
hiawatha is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 26-05-2011, 11:15
aussie_dave_
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
I have to agree, this certainly ranks as one of the poorest lots Ive seen.

I wouldnt mind so much but there isnt even any characters. I mean even last years series was only saved by Mr Baggs the Brand.
aussie_dave_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 11:37
Shrike
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
I have to agree, this certainly ranks as one of the poorest lots Ive seen.

I wouldnt mind so much but there isnt even any characters. I mean even last years series was only saved by Mr Baggs the Brand.
The hopelessly self deluded Melissa gave me a few laughs before being ganged up on by horrible people.
Joanna, Shibby, Alex, Paloma, Jamie, Stella - all had much more about them than this lot so far
Shrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 11:52
aussie_dave_
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
The hopelessly self deluded Melissa gave me a few laughs before being ganged up on by horrible people.
Joanna, Shibby, Alex, Paloma, Jamie, Stella - all had much more about them than this lot so far
What was the name of that stunning Indian girl on last year? Cant remember but she had the most amazing eyes. I could even overlook her nose given how stunning she was.

There is not a single guy on here who didnt have a thing for her. Not one.
aussie_dave_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 12:17
Shrike
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
What was the name of that stunning Indian girl on last year? Cant remember but she had the most amazing eyes. I could even overlook her nose given how stunning she was.

There is not a single guy on here who didnt have a thing for her. Not one.
Sandeesh - yes quite stunning. It was a good year for letching over the female 'prentices last year
Sadly Felicity was the only one to catch my eye this time
Shrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 12:56
Socha
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Laich Kintraes
Posts: 4,086
So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.
Sadly I agree. It's the most boring series so far.

Maybe because most of them are very young and - despite having made some money for themselves, - actually quite inexperienced.
Socha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 13:05
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,010
There is not a single guy on here who didnt have a thing for her. Not one.
Whilst Sandeesh was popular, I was under the impression that Liz was the most popular, most universally liked one amongst the male contingent on here.
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 13:17
huddiepuddies
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 70
Whilst Sandeesh was popular, I was under the impression that Liz was the most popular, most universally liked one amongst the male contingent on here.
One vote here for the absolutely stunning Paloma, the all time Apprentice sausage woofer.
huddiepuddies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 13:56
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,010
One vote here for the absolutely stunning Paloma, the all time Apprentice sausage woofer.
Gorgeous but one of those people whose personality makes them ugly, IMO.
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 14:13
aussie_dave_
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
Whilst Sandeesh was popular, I was under the impression that Liz was the most popular, most universally liked one amongst the male contingent on here.
For me Liz was to 'generically' good looking.

You know, yes she ticked all the boxes etc etc, but see Sandeesh transeded that to 'stunning' there was something unique about her, whereas Liz for as good looking as she was, you can find replicas of her just walking down Oxford Street any day of the week.

Sandeesh has something about her that you arent just going to find every day. Im only talking about lookswise, for all I know she was a right cow.
aussie_dave_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 14:15
aussie_dave_
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
One vote here for the absolutely stunning Paloma, the all time Apprentice sausage woofer.
Paloma reminded me of a man. And Im not even saying that to wind people up. She had quite masculine features.
aussie_dave_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 14:17
milmol
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,524
So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.
I agree, I was starting to wonder last night how LAS is going to get out of this series with any credibility in tact

If they one by one make some stupid decision/error in a task and he rips them apart in the boardroom for it, its going to take a bit of pride-swallowing to say he's now prepared to go into business with them

Also, isn't he going to ask what the business proposition is?? Or will that be part of the process / final?? Surely they must have some ideas what they are going to do .
milmol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 14:32
whedon247
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17,297
liz was hooot
whedon247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 14:41
huddiepuddies
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 70
Paloma reminded me of a man. And Im not even saying that to wind people up. She had quite masculine features.
Was it the beard, the sideburns, the nicotined stained fingers from pipe smoking or the bulging pair of bollocks held in by the Farah slacks and only visible to you.

May I direct you to the website of last week's losing PM, Gavin.
huddiepuddies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 15:08
Shrike
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
...Sandeesh has something about her that you arent just going to find every day. Im only talking about lookswise, for all I know she was a right cow.
I recall an FM met her in a bar just after her firing and she was lovely - posed for a snap and was very chatty.
Shrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 15:12
cooperone
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Digital Spy Forum
Posts: 4,382
So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.
Just posted similar on another thread, I'm with you, Lord Sugar must be getting worried, especially if its his 250 K that will be used to start the business
cooperone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 15:14
milmol
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,524
What a strange thread - two unrelated discussions going on and its only on page 1!
milmol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 15:15
-Sid-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
I'm in the minority but I prefer this series because there's no one like Stuart Baggs whose behaviour used to spoil a lot of last year's episodes for me.

Tom's slightly eccentric, which is fine. But I hate it when one character takes over the whole show.
-Sid- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 17:36
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,010
For me Liz was to 'generically' good looking.

You know, yes she ticked all the boxes etc etc, but see Sandeesh transeded that to 'stunning' there was something unique about her, whereas Liz for as good looking as she was, you can find replicas of her just walking down Oxford Street any day of the week.
Yeah, I agree with you actually, I'm just reluctant as a female to criticise Liz, we do get branded as 'jellus' quite easily. I personally would have found Sandeesh, Stella and Paloma more striking than her. Liz is very good-looking though, no doubt about that.

What a strange thread - two unrelated discussions going on and its only on page 1!
Yeah, it weird the way threads can meander sometimes!
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 19:55
Shrike
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
Yeah, I agree with you actually, I'm just reluctant as a female to criticise Liz, we do get branded as 'jellus' quite easily. I personally would have found Sandeesh, Stella and Paloma more striking than her. Liz is very good-looking though, no doubt about that.
Liz was very conventionally pretty - rather too studied for my taste (like Kate Walsh) - though for me the fake boobs would be a complete no-no
Shrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2011, 20:00
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,010
though for me the fake boobs would be a complete no-no
I know, so incongruous with her lean, slender frame.

I like natural boobies, whatever the size, over fakes.
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:32.