• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
None of them.
hiawatha
26-05-2011
So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.
aussie_dave_
26-05-2011
I have to agree, this certainly ranks as one of the poorest lots Ive seen.

I wouldnt mind so much but there isnt even any characters. I mean even last years series was only saved by Mr Baggs the Brand.
Shrike
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_:
“I have to agree, this certainly ranks as one of the poorest lots Ive seen.

I wouldnt mind so much but there isnt even any characters. I mean even last years series was only saved by Mr Baggs the Brand.”

The hopelessly self deluded Melissa gave me a few laughs before being ganged up on by horrible people.
Joanna, Shibby, Alex, Paloma, Jamie, Stella - all had much more about them than this lot so far
aussie_dave_
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by Shrike:
“The hopelessly self deluded Melissa gave me a few laughs before being ganged up on by horrible people.
Joanna, Shibby, Alex, Paloma, Jamie, Stella - all had much more about them than this lot so far”

What was the name of that stunning Indian girl on last year? Cant remember but she had the most amazing eyes. I could even overlook her nose given how stunning she was.

There is not a single guy on here who didnt have a thing for her. Not one.
Shrike
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_:
“What was the name of that stunning Indian girl on last year? Cant remember but she had the most amazing eyes. I could even overlook her nose given how stunning she was.

There is not a single guy on here who didnt have a thing for her. Not one.”

Sandeesh - yes quite stunning. It was a good year for letching over the female 'prentices last year
Sadly Felicity was the only one to catch my eye this time
Socha
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by hiawatha:
“So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.”

Sadly I agree. It's the most boring series so far.

Maybe because most of them are very young and - despite having made some money for themselves, - actually quite inexperienced.
parthy
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_:
“There is not a single guy on here who didnt have a thing for her. Not one.”

Whilst Sandeesh was popular, I was under the impression that Liz was the most popular, most universally liked one amongst the male contingent on here.
huddiepuddies
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by parthy:
“Whilst Sandeesh was popular, I was under the impression that Liz was the most popular, most universally liked one amongst the male contingent on here. ”

One vote here for the absolutely stunning Paloma, the all time Apprentice sausage woofer.
parthy
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by huddiepuddies:
“One vote here for the absolutely stunning Paloma, the all time Apprentice sausage woofer.”

Gorgeous but one of those people whose personality makes them ugly, IMO.
aussie_dave_
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by parthy:
“Whilst Sandeesh was popular, I was under the impression that Liz was the most popular, most universally liked one amongst the male contingent on here. ”

For me Liz was to 'generically' good looking.

You know, yes she ticked all the boxes etc etc, but see Sandeesh transeded that to 'stunning' there was something unique about her, whereas Liz for as good looking as she was, you can find replicas of her just walking down Oxford Street any day of the week.

Sandeesh has something about her that you arent just going to find every day. Im only talking about lookswise, for all I know she was a right cow.
aussie_dave_
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by huddiepuddies:
“One vote here for the absolutely stunning Paloma, the all time Apprentice sausage woofer.”

Paloma reminded me of a man. And Im not even saying that to wind people up. She had quite masculine features.
milmol
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by hiawatha:
“So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.”

I agree, I was starting to wonder last night how LAS is going to get out of this series with any credibility in tact

If they one by one make some stupid decision/error in a task and he rips them apart in the boardroom for it, its going to take a bit of pride-swallowing to say he's now prepared to go into business with them

Also, isn't he going to ask what the business proposition is?? Or will that be part of the process / final?? Surely they must have some ideas what they are going to do .
whedon247
26-05-2011
liz was hooot
huddiepuddies
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_:
“Paloma reminded me of a man. And Im not even saying that to wind people up. She had quite masculine features.”

Was it the beard, the sideburns, the nicotined stained fingers from pipe smoking or the bulging pair of bollocks held in by the Farah slacks and only visible to you.

May I direct you to the website of last week's losing PM, Gavin.
Shrike
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_:
“...Sandeesh has something about her that you arent just going to find every day. Im only talking about lookswise, for all I know she was a right cow.”

I recall an FM met her in a bar just after her firing and she was lovely - posed for a snap and was very chatty.
cooperone
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by hiawatha:
“So far there's not one of them that deserves to be sponsored with 1/4 million to set up a business. I wouldn't trust any of them with 10 pounds.
This seems to be the worst group ever selected for this show. How on earth do they pick them.
If they are representative of the best young entrepreneurs in this country then we are in real trouble.”

Just posted similar on another thread, I'm with you, Lord Sugar must be getting worried, especially if its his 250 K that will be used to start the business
milmol
26-05-2011
What a strange thread - two unrelated discussions going on and its only on page 1!
-Sid-
26-05-2011
I'm in the minority but I prefer this series because there's no one like Stuart Baggs whose behaviour used to spoil a lot of last year's episodes for me.

Tom's slightly eccentric, which is fine. But I hate it when one character takes over the whole show.
parthy
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_:
“For me Liz was to 'generically' good looking.

You know, yes she ticked all the boxes etc etc, but see Sandeesh transeded that to 'stunning' there was something unique about her, whereas Liz for as good looking as she was, you can find replicas of her just walking down Oxford Street any day of the week.”

Yeah, I agree with you actually, I'm just reluctant as a female to criticise Liz, we do get branded as 'jellus' quite easily. I personally would have found Sandeesh, Stella and Paloma more striking than her. Liz is very good-looking though, no doubt about that.

Originally Posted by milmol:
“What a strange thread - two unrelated discussions going on and its only on page 1! ”

Yeah, it weird the way threads can meander sometimes!
Shrike
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by parthy:
“Yeah, I agree with you actually, I'm just reluctant as a female to criticise Liz, we do get branded as 'jellus' quite easily. I personally would have found Sandeesh, Stella and Paloma more striking than her. Liz is very good-looking though, no doubt about that.”

Liz was very conventionally pretty - rather too studied for my taste (like Kate Walsh) - though for me the fake boobs would be a complete no-no
parthy
26-05-2011
Originally Posted by Shrike:
“ though for me the fake boobs would be a complete no-no”

I know, so incongruous with her lean, slender frame.

I like natural boobies, whatever the size, over fakes.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map