Ofcom ban 3 year contracts

spanglysteve · 31-05-2011, 13:12

Quote:

I think the ban is a bad idea. I'm not saying 3 year contracts are a good thing but the decision and choice should be left up to the buyer.

The only problem with this logic is that unless you ban them, the networks would slowly move that way and you would have been left with no choice even if you wanted a shorter contract.

I remember when the 18month contracts first came out, generally they just existed for those who wanted to pay less per month, but slowly they became the norm with 12m contracts becoming prohibitively expensive. The same is happening now, the norm is moving away from 18m to 24m and the price point at 18m is becoming much higher.

daclick · 31-05-2011, 23:14

good, i have to buy a new phone every 12 months cos i cant have the same phone for 24 months thats like ages!! android FTW

TKDFan · 01-06-2011, 09:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by daclick

good, i have to buy a new phone every 12 months cos i cant have the same phone for 24 months thats like ages!! android FTW

Someone has a gun to your head?

flagpole · 01-06-2011, 09:46

banning 3 year contracts is protecting the consumer from themselves.

i wonder if this has any implications for the adding part of your current contract on to your next one. i know a couple of kids that have had to have had the latest iPhone as soon as it came out and have been getting 24 months contracts + whatever was remaining on their current....

2 or 3 years is a long time. in that time you could move house or start dating. imagine being in a house with no signal for 3 years.

davethorp · 01-06-2011, 09:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by carguy143

I've never seen a 3 year contract in the uk

The only network I've seen to offer them was orange and for that it was a cheap nokia that's about £20 on pay as you go and then £5 or £10 a month depending on which tariff was taken. I can't imagine they got many takers

It's good the networks aren't allowed to move to 3 year contracts given their progressive phasing out of 12 month and now attempting to phase out 18 month contracts. The networks blame higher phone prices but an iPhone and the like isn't any more expensive to buy sim free than the latest nokia was 10 years ago. Least the networks always used to quote replacement costs of £400-£500 when trying to flog you insurance. If anything factoring inflation into account phones are actually less expensive now

noise747 · 03-06-2011, 09:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanglysteve

The only problem with this logic is that unless you ban them, the networks would slowly move that way and you would have been left with no choice even if you wanted a shorter contract.

I remember when the 18month contracts first came out, generally they just existed for those who wanted to pay less per month, but slowly they became the norm with 12m contracts becoming prohibitively expensive. The same is happening now, the norm is moving away from 18m to 24m and the price point at 18m is becoming much higher.

Correct, but i hope they also ban 3 year conteracts for stuff like broadband and T.V, BT is doing 18 month contracts on their packages, if they can get away with it, they will go for 2 years.

i think 18 months is long enough to be honest and if even 2 years was banned, mobile phone service providers and ISPs for that matter would still do offers as they want 6to get customers.

I think a lot of it is fixed anyway, the difference between contracts from one phone supplier to another is pretty small.

noise747 · 03-06-2011, 09:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by davethorp

The only network I've seen to offer them was orange and for that it was a cheap nokia that's about £20 on pay as you go and then £5 or £10 a month depending on which tariff was taken. I can't imagine they got many takers

It's good the networks aren't allowed to move to 3 year contracts given their progressive phasing out of 12 month and now attempting to phase out 18 month contracts. The networks blame higher phone prices but an iPhone and the like isn't any more expensive to buy sim free than the latest nokia was 10 years ago. Least the networks always used to quote replacement costs of £400-£500 when trying to flog you insurance. If anything factoring inflation into account phones are actually less expensive now

My mate went to Orange broadband mobile phone his phone contract is for 3 years, but as you said it is a cheap phone and the contract cost him a fiver a month.

The internet is only 12 months I think.

I got a 2 year contract on my Vodafone mobile contract, i stuck with it now for another 21 months, I think i will go for another sim only after and keep the phone if it is still working at that time.

daleski75 · 09-06-2011, 17:39

wow 3 years is a long time I can barely cope with a 2 year contract!

Good on ofcom to ban that before they all start to offer 3 year contracts and phase out 18 months.

noise747 · 10-06-2011, 09:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by daleski75

wow 3 years is a long time I can barely cope with a 2 year contract!

Good on ofcom to ban that before they all start to offer 3 year contracts and phase out 18 months.

it is a long time, 2 years is long enough, and with things changing like they do with people losing jobs.

I don't think any company need to do longer contracts than 12 months to be honest.

31-05-2011, 13:12	#26
spanglysteve Forum Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,380	Quote: Originally Posted by TheBigM I think the ban is a bad idea. I'm not saying 3 year contracts are a good thing but the decision and choice should be left up to the buyer. The only problem with this logic is that unless you ban them, the networks would slowly move that way and you would have been left with no choice even if you wanted a shorter contract. I remember when the 18month contracts first came out, generally they just existed for those who wanted to pay less per month, but slowly they became the norm with 12m contracts becoming prohibitively expensive. The same is happening now, the norm is moving away from 18m to 24m and the price point at 18m is becoming much higher.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

31-05-2011, 23:14	#27
daclick Forum Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 3,336	good, i have to buy a new phone every 12 months cos i cant have the same phone for 24 months thats like ages!! android FTW

01-06-2011, 09:19	#28
TKDFan Forum Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,811	Quote: Originally Posted by daclick good, *i have to buy a new phone every 12 months* cos i cant have the same phone for 24 months thats like ages!! android FTW Someone has a gun to your head?

01-06-2011, 09:46	#29
flagpole Inactive Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 43,524	banning 3 year contracts is protecting the consumer from themselves. i wonder if this has any implications for the adding part of your current contract on to your next one. i know a couple of kids that have had to have had the latest iPhone as soon as it came out and have been getting 24 months contracts + whatever was remaining on their current.... 2 or 3 years is a long time. in that time you could move house or start dating. imagine being in a house with no signal for 3 years.

01-06-2011, 09:53	#30
davethorp Forum Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Preston, Lancashire Posts: 7,255	Quote: Originally Posted by carguy143 I've never seen a 3 year contract in the uk The only network I've seen to offer them was orange and for that it was a cheap nokia that's about £20 on pay as you go and then £5 or £10 a month depending on which tariff was taken. I can't imagine they got many takers It's good the networks aren't allowed to move to 3 year contracts given their progressive phasing out of 12 month and now attempting to phase out 18 month contracts. The networks blame higher phone prices but an iPhone and the like isn't any more expensive to buy sim free than the latest nokia was 10 years ago. Least the networks always used to quote replacement costs of £400-£500 when trying to flog you insurance. If anything factoring inflation into account phones are actually less expensive now

03-06-2011, 09:20	#31
noise747 Forum Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Herefordshire Posts: 22,810	Quote: Originally Posted by spanglysteve The only problem with this logic is that unless you ban them, the networks would slowly move that way and you would have been left with no choice even if you wanted a shorter contract. I remember when the 18month contracts first came out, generally they just existed for those who wanted to pay less per month, but slowly they became the norm with 12m contracts becoming prohibitively expensive. The same is happening now, the norm is moving away from 18m to 24m and the price point at 18m is becoming much higher. Correct, but i hope they also ban 3 year conteracts for stuff like broadband and T.V, BT is doing 18 month contracts on their packages, if they can get away with it, they will go for 2 years. i think 18 months is long enough to be honest and if even 2 years was banned, mobile phone service providers and ISPs for that matter would still do offers as they want 6to get customers. I think a lot of it is fixed anyway, the difference between contracts from one phone supplier to another is pretty small.

03-06-2011, 09:22	#32
noise747 Forum Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Herefordshire Posts: 22,810	Quote: Originally Posted by davethorp The only network I've seen to offer them was orange and for that it was a cheap nokia that's about £20 on pay as you go and then £5 or £10 a month depending on which tariff was taken. I can't imagine they got many takers It's good the networks aren't allowed to move to 3 year contracts given their progressive phasing out of 12 month and now attempting to phase out 18 month contracts. The networks blame higher phone prices but an iPhone and the like isn't any more expensive to buy sim free than the latest nokia was 10 years ago. Least the networks always used to quote replacement costs of £400-£500 when trying to flog you insurance. If anything factoring inflation into account phones are actually less expensive now My mate went to Orange broadband mobile phone his phone contract is for 3 years, but as you said it is a cheap phone and the contract cost him a fiver a month. The internet is only 12 months I think. I got a 2 year contract on my Vodafone mobile contract, i stuck with it now for another 21 months, I think i will go for another sim only after and keep the phone if it is still working at that time.

09-06-2011, 17:39	#33
daleski75 Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Northampton Posts: 1,014	wow 3 years is a long time I can barely cope with a 2 year contract! Good on ofcom to ban that before they all start to offer 3 year contracts and phase out 18 months.

10-06-2011, 09:10	#34
noise747 Forum Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Herefordshire Posts: 22,810	Quote: Originally Posted by daleski75 wow 3 years is a long time I can barely cope with a 2 year contract! Good on ofcom to ban that before they all start to offer 3 year contracts and phase out 18 months. it is a long time, 2 years is long enough, and with things changing like they do with people losing jobs. I don't think any company need to do longer contracts than 12 months to be honest.

DS Forums

Ofcom ban 3 year contracts