Going over to the Mint forums, and it's clear the users are wanting to pull it in all sorts of directions. The Ubuntu forums are the same, but thank God that at least they can make a decision and focus on it, and not be pulled off course by a lot of moaning. You might not like Unity or Gnome 3, but they are clear about what they are doing.
Mint however, seems a bit confused. I'm not sure what they mean by continuing to use Gnome 2, and also using Gnome 3 without its desktop shell. And now I'm reading how the main developer might contribute to Gnome's fallback mode in order to have something approximating Gnome 2! I don't know how much of this is fact or fanboy hopefulness, but I do hope they can focus on something and stick to it without being dragged off course by complainers.
As I said above, my thoughts are they should have stuck with Ubuntu, but made Unity their own thing. Mint was created to perfect Ubuntu's rough edges. I don't see why this should change. I don't know how Ubuntu develops Unity or whether this is possible, but MintUnity could be fantastic, especially if they based it on their own MintMenu. Is that a crap idea, or would it be feasible do you think?