Originally Posted by
cnbcwatcher:
“Well, I finally got something working on my old laptop. I found a disc from late 2012 with Lubuntu 12.10 32-bit on it. I know it's not the newest version but I can always update it and maybe on an old XP era laptop an older version is better. Everything seems to work ok, including the wifi
Now the machine is usable for web surfing and other basic tasks and maybe a few simple games. It won't replace my Macs but it breathes a new lease of life into an old Windows XP-era (late 2004) laptop. I'm kinda attached to the laptop as I got it for Christmas when I was 14 and it was my first personal laptop
”

Wow, that's when Westlife became a four piece after Brian McFadden left the band to go solo! Seriously, I find Lubuntu to be a bit meh and I'd suggest LXLE or Zorin Lite instead as alternatives. Good to see that the laptop's been brought back to life though.
Originally Posted by Kal_El:
“Just listened to this. Very interesting. Bit annoyed at the Ubuntu guy ("Popey") getting very sniffy about Cinnamon/Mint, calling them (and by extension its users) "Refuseniks".
I am not a refusenik. I haven't shied away from the new desktops. I've used Shell and Unity many times and do like them. We use Ubuntu and its Unity desktop here, and it's fine and nice, but Cinnamon is ahead. Simply, it is faster, easier to use and I'd even say prettier too, especially so after adding a simple dock. Unity can prove too fiddly and fussy in a way that Cinnamon just isn't. The claim that Cinnamon is somehow holding things back and is not forward looking enough is frankly ridiculous. What could be more forward looking than a fast, light, feature-rich and easy to use desktop? Be careful Ubuntu-bods, to not get lost upside your own arse and start believing your own PR.
There is definitely an element in my mind that says Ubuntu is a little worried by the attention Mint gets, and just dismissing this as people who are a bit retro and not "forward looking" is disingenuous. Ubuntu needs to take a proper look at just why Mint is ahead in the go-to Linux stakes now. Hint: it's not just because it has a bar at the bottom folks.
I do hope in the long run that Mint gets the support it needs and can eventually move to the Debian base solely. It'll be a slow process, but I do think it will happen.”
Hmmm. That comes across as a defensive comment. Comparisons have already been drawn between the seismic interface changes that have happened to both Ubuntu (Unity) and Windows (Win 8) with the results that the more conventional Linux Mint variants and Win 7 are more popular.
My own view is that if Linux wants to get wider acceptance and use, then having more familiar and conventional navigation interfaces will help to bring converts over from other operating systems.
I still think it's unfortunate that the Lindows/Linspire operation never took off and succeeded all those years ago whereby desktop PCs where supplied in the USA with a pre-installed Linux operating system because that would have reached the masses. That's still relatively rare this days although I've come across a number of IT firms that install Linux Mint or Ubuntu on refurbished PC but that's still at a low level.