• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
I find it funny simon told fake Britney girl to be more risky.
belfastkid
31-05-2011
When it was probably him and the production team that limited her to wearing a bikini and not being allowed to show her boobs etc. Hypocrasy for him to criticise her for it.
Bumtiddlywinks
31-05-2011
you didnt see the look he made as he drank his glass of water?

He doesnt care either way.

He said that in a "heck why not?" kinda way. Because he knows its too late now and she wont be getting into the next round.

The guy just doesnt give a toodles anymore. He has no vested interest in any of the acts at all.
mickmars
01-06-2011
she sung Britneys songs live,,which ironically is more than Britney has ever done
SherbetLemon
01-06-2011
Originally Posted by belfastkid:
“When it was probably him and the production team that limited her to wearing a bikini and not being allowed to show her boobs etc. Hypocrasy for him to criticise her for it.”

Umm... ever heard of TV regulations and the 9pm watershed? No way could they have shown nudity at that time on a live TV show where they can't edit it.
wallster
01-06-2011
Although I wasn't keen on her act, I thought this girl was treated badly. She was originally rejected, then brought back and castigated for trying to appeal to a family audience. Why bring her back? If I were her, I'd be furious.
Mozitski
01-06-2011
Originally Posted by SherbetLemon:
“Umm... ever heard of TV regulations and the 9pm watershed? No way could they have shown nudity at that time on a live TV show where they can't edit it.”

Then why tell her to be more risky? lol
Denise
01-06-2011
Originally Posted by wallster:
“Although I wasn't keen on her act, I thought this girl was treated badly. She was originally rejected, then brought back and castigated for trying to appeal to a family audience. Why bring her back? If I were her, I'd be furious.”

Why would you be furious? She was given a second shot on national television on one of the highest viewing shows. You can't get better advertising than that and for free.
davedub
01-06-2011
Simon Cowell always contradicts himself, if she had of being raunchy last night he would have being the first to buzz and say the act wasnt suitable for the queen etc :sleep:

I did feel sorry for her she wasnt bad and defo didnt deserve 3 buzzes
Zoltan Smith
01-06-2011
She appeared as naked as any tv station will allow, there was no "more risque" than that. It was a silly, bored comment.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map