She isnt popular on here, but she is good in the boardroom.
She is also the only one that sees through Jim too
She is also the only one that sees through Jim too
Natasha stock rising now
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“She isnt popular on here, but she is good in the boardroom.
She is also the only one that sees through Jim too”
“She isnt popular on here, but she is good in the boardroom.
She is also the only one that sees through Jim too”
Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.
She's bloody annoying. Just regurgitates what's been said in the boardroom in a fancy way and presents itas new information.
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.”
“Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.”
Sugar unmarked it this week
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“Sugar unmarked it this week”
“Sugar unmarked it this week”
Of course he did.
(smiles and backs away slowly).
Still not seeing anything remarkable in Natasha.
I keep feeling like she's blagging her way through this and will eventually become unstuck.
Zoe and Melody are the strongest girls in my opinion.
I keep feeling like she's blagging her way through this and will eventually become unstuck.
Zoe and Melody are the strongest girls in my opinion.
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“Still not seeing anything remarkable in Natasha.
I keep feeling like she's blagging her way through this and will eventually become unstuck.
Zoe and Melody are the strongest girls in my opinion.”
“Still not seeing anything remarkable in Natasha.
I keep feeling like she's blagging her way through this and will eventually become unstuck.
Zoe and Melody are the strongest girls in my opinion.”
Natasha has two things going for her, Mmmmmmm.
By yes, she is a blagger.
she can direct an advert, what else has she done?
yes she can see through Jim but thats because she is trying to play a game as well just not as good as him at it
yes she can see through Jim but thats because she is trying to play a game as well just not as good as him at it
Originally Posted by Caltonfan:
“she can direct an advert, what else has she done?
yes she can see through Jim but thats because she is trying to play a game as well just not as good as him at it”
“she can direct an advert, what else has she done?
yes she can see through Jim but thats because she is trying to play a game as well just not as good as him at it”
Sounds a bit BB now
but I agree they are both the best game players of each sex
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“She isnt popular on here, but she is good in the boardroom.
She is also the only one that sees through Jim too”
“She isnt popular on here, but she is good in the boardroom.
She is also the only one that sees through Jim too”
I thought you where about to say bedroom!
I do think she is quite good to look at as are most of the ladies.I don't agree at all with your main point though. I've noticed that she keeps on diss-associating herself from the aims/agreements of the group she's in if they lose.
It would have been more than fair enough for her to point out that it was Vincent who jumped on "Everydog", but her diss-associating herself from the group seems to be a general tactic. Karen was getting at this a few weeks back.
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.”
“Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.”
Karren said she was verbal but lacked substance. This week Natasha showed she had some substance: she showed a basic competence doing the advert. It's not enough to win, but it's a lot more than she had before. You can go a long way in this show by taking on responsibilities and not screwing them up.
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“Karren said she was verbal but lacked substance. This week Natasha showed she had some substance: she showed a basic competence doing the advert. It's not enough to win, but it's a lot more than she had before. You can go a long way in this show by taking on responsibilities and not screwing them up.”
“Karren said she was verbal but lacked substance. This week Natasha showed she had some substance: she showed a basic competence doing the advert. It's not enough to win, but it's a lot more than she had before. You can go a long way in this show by taking on responsibilities and not screwing them up.”
Agreed if she gets pm soon and wins she immediately becomes one of the faves to win
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“she is good in the boardroom.”
“she is good in the boardroom.”
She isn't though; tonights tasks failure just wasn't her fault pure and simple. If she done something dubious and another challenged her on it she would fold like a pack of cards; why else does she never stand up to people outside of the boardroom?
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.”
“Karen marked her card last week. I have seen nothing to change that view.”
Well it's a good job Karren isn't the organ-grinder then, isn't it?
Possible redemption arc <3
From my perspective, Natasha is certainly causing something to rise.
To be honest everyone is getting sh*te edits, but someone must win. Unless Shugs just fires everyone and goes into business with Karen instead.
From my perspective, Natasha is certainly causing something to rise.
To be honest everyone is getting sh*te edits, but someone must win.
Unless Shugs just fires everyone and goes into business with Karen instead.
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“Karren said she was verbal but lacked substance. This week Natasha showed she had some substance: she showed a basic competence doing the advert. It's not enough to win, but it's a lot more than she had before. You can go a long way in this show by taking on responsibilities and not screwing them up.”
“Karren said she was verbal but lacked substance. This week Natasha showed she had some substance: she showed a basic competence doing the advert. It's not enough to win, but it's a lot more than she had before. You can go a long way in this show by taking on responsibilities and not screwing them up.”
Karen made the point last week that Natasha is good at spinning things according to what she hears in the boardroom. And she did exactly that again this week, by saying she deliberately directed the advert away from the concept of the "every dog" - but only after she'd heard everyone slate it in the boardroom.
And as for people finding her attractive (which shouldn't matter but hey ho), she looks liked she's lived without sleep for 2 years and has a permanent nose cold. Can't stand her.
Definitely getting mixed messages. I was extremely impressed with the way she handled the advert. I believe she sold quite well, too.
She is someone that we definitely need to see as PM. We would probably get a much better idea of her overall abilities.
She is someone that we definitely need to see as PM. We would probably get a much better idea of her overall abilities.
She's a numbskull with no chance of winning. The advert was the least worst of the two awful ads. She's gobby and will be - and has already been - shown up soon enough.
Originally Posted by Jepson:
“Definitely getting mixed messages. I was extremely impressed with the way she handled the advert. I believe she sold quite well, too.
She is someone that we definitely need to see as PM. We would probably get a much better idea of her overall abilities.”
“Definitely getting mixed messages. I was extremely impressed with the way she handled the advert. I believe she sold quite well, too.
She is someone that we definitely need to see as PM. We would probably get a much better idea of her overall abilities.”
Agreed hopefully she is pm soon, if she is and does a good job she immediately becomes one of the favourites to win
Can't stand her - she never seems to smile and seems to be quite bitchy to save her own back (rather than fair).
But, she went to a school which was known locally for being non-academic (when I was growing up in Taunton I knew boys at that school whose only GCSE subjects were woodwork and metalwork, or similar) so even if it's improved, she's coming from the back foot.
I guess she's used to having to fight to be seen and hasn't yet realised how undesireable that appears on TV.
But, she went to a school which was known locally for being non-academic (when I was growing up in Taunton I knew boys at that school whose only GCSE subjects were woodwork and metalwork, or similar) so even if it's improved, she's coming from the back foot.
I guess she's used to having to fight to be seen and hasn't yet realised how undesireable that appears on TV.
