Originally Posted by spjntl:
“i really dont understnad why peopl are on this service, it has no advantages over sky or ntl, I work for NTL i know we can provide por service sometimes, but this Homechoice thingy looks a load of rubbish, I actually have sky (only because I dont live in a cabled area), and sky is fantastic, i know you get BB thrpown in the package with homechocie but the packages for tv are crap.
someone tell me why”
Well, I've got both Sky and HC so I'd have a different opinion to you on HC being for people without sky. Without getting emotive, my logic goes something like this...
I want 1Mb broadband... which is, what, 25 quid minimum for a half decent service (HC's internet has been rock solid for the 4 years I've been a customer). So I pay an extra £10 to get the basic VOD package. With a canny bit of wiring both my Sky and HC are available in several rooms, so that £10 for the tv bit of HC could be seen as instead of a 2nd sky box.
But for me, the great thing is the replay. At the moment it's not every programme on every channel but it's a damn good start. Like a TiVO that you dont even have to remember to set!
It all adds up, but I've been keeping a track on how much we've been using the Sky film channels recently and I reckon that for my household we'd save money by dropping the Sky films sub and just "renting" the movies we want on HC or sub'ing to their film channel.
Just one example but what I'm saying is that I believe they are complimenetary not simply one being better than the other. It also depends what you want to watch.
Plus visitors always ask what the big blue light is on the bookshelf above the TV!