Hiya, so I know this is very late but been through the whole head and wanted to comment on a few things and offer my own opinion
Originally Posted by clarkgable:
“How do we know she missed (might have to go back and rewatch the episode)- maybe she just wounded her...fatally as it would happen?”
We know she missed because in the second episode she said to the girl "I'm sorry I shot you. I'm glad I missed."
Originally Posted by
CD93:
“It's quite funny that the answer screamed us in the face right at the start..
"...it's my Birthday today."
You just don't expect such coincidences in a time travel show
”
yes i thought that retrospectively. How did Rory or the doctor not notice?
Originally Posted by MinkytheDog:
“@kitthekat
I thought of a way to illustrate it...
Imagine that River and the Doctor are only allowed to meet once a year - let's say Valentine's Day just because.
They each have a book of tickets - 50 tickets each - one for year and every time they meet, they have to hand the ticket in.
River tears her tickets out starting at number 50 - in her 70th year - and the Doctor tears his out starting at number 1 - in his 20th year (call those years since they met - not ages).
On their first meeting, he'd be 20 and she'd be 70 and she'd remember everything that happened in those 50 years but he wouldn't because they haven't happened to him yet. Ten meetings later and he'd be 30 - ten years older - but she'd only be 60 - ten years younger. He'd know a bit more about her - 10 years worth - but she would know a bit less about him - again, ten years worth.
At their 25th meeting, they each know exactly as much about each other - they would have shared the same experiences.
From the 26th meeting onwards, he then knows more about her than she does about him - he's effectively from her future.
By their 50th meeting, he's 70 and she's only 20 - she now knows everything that happened in those 50 years and she knows nothing - because it hasn't happened yet.
Basically, their linear time-lines both move in the same direction. It's just that they only ever meet versions of each other from different ends of those time lines - his older self only ever meets her younger self and vice versa. In other words, the meetings are points in their time line - not a flowing series of events.
The recent meetings have been closer together than the whole years in the "ticket" example so they are effectively the same visit. Change "Valentine's Day" to "Adventure" and it allows a meeting to last a number of linear days rather than just a couple of hours.
It does mean that a future Doctor (or this Doctor in future episodes) can continue meeting River Song without her ever needing to regenerate and her "death" in the library is completely irrelevent. Basically, that was "old" River and from now on, he can meeting younger and younger Rivers all the way up to the point where the "ticket" arrangement was made/imposed - which could be 40 years or thousands of years if she regenerates prior to being "this" River Song. The only thing he can't do is meet an older version of "this" River Song - no problem.”
My only problem with this theory is that Steven Moffat said he based the idea of River on the time travellers wife. In that Henry meets Clare at all different times. It's not a straight your first is my last. What I'm saying is that every time the doctor meets river doesn't mean that she knows less and he knows more.
Originally Posted by Granny McSmith:
“I must say, on second viewing I liked the episode much better than on the first one.
I think I just spent the first viewing hoping all the stuff I'd read on here wasn't true. Now I know some of it is, I was more relaxed (even without a gun pointing at the Doctor) and just accepted it.”
I share the same feelings as you. On the first viewing I was disappointed and felt let down. Have watched it several times since and everytime liked it more. It really has grown on me.
Originally Posted by jonnyjackov:
“I still get the impression that when she says, 'You look like we haven't done that before', and he replies 'We haven't' and she looks devastated, that is because it was the first kiss in her timeline with the doctor, and as it was also the first kiss for him with her, she realises that will be the ONLY kiss they EVER have. That's just how I saw it.
If it is both their first kiss with each other, and they are travelling in opposite directions (which is debatable I know), then it is impossible that they will ever kiss again.”
That's not River's first kiss though. She said to the doctor "aren't you forgetting something?" suggesting that she had kissed him many times before.
Originally Posted by Helbore:
“It's not that far-fetched an idea. My dad comes from a Jewish family and he has his name in both English and Hebrew. So name translations do happen.”
ye good point. I'm jewish and have a hebrew name and also have many friends who have different english names to their hebrew names. Prime example is the name Jacob who's hebrew name could be Yisrael which translated back into english is Israel.
Originally Posted by steven87gill:
“It's semantics, but will the second half of this year's Doctor Who actually be called series 7? Or just Series 6 part 2?”
It will be the second part of series 6