• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
The Timelords
silenceisfallin
06-06-2011
Does anyone else not think that there is a lot more significance to that fact that there were so many time lords drawn to the planet in TDW , when the doctor has repeatedly said that he and the master were the only 2 left???
Last edited by silenceisfallin : 06-06-2011 at 23:42
rostaria
06-06-2011
Originally Posted by silenceisfallin:
“Does anyone else not think that there is a lot more significance to that fact that there were so many time lords drawn to the planet in TDW , when the doctor has repeatedly said that he and the master were the only 2 left???”

I think its Timelords from the past.
redrooster555
06-06-2011
Originally Posted by rostaria:
“I think its Timelords from the past.”

It is.
silenceisfallin
06-06-2011
O right ok was just thinking tho , ifthe doctor is raising an army and we know the darleks are in this series so I thought he might have to cross his own timeline ad save them and then recruit them ?
rostaria
06-06-2011
Originally Posted by silenceisfallin:
“O right ok was just thinking tho , ifthe doctor is raising an army and we know the darleks are in this series so I thought he might have to cross his own timeline ad save them and then recruit them ?”

The daleks are not in this series. Moffat has put them on haitus.
AndyGibbard
06-06-2011
Originally Posted by rostaria:
“The daleks are not in this series. Moffat has put them on haitus.”

allegedly
silenceisfallin
06-06-2011
Originally Posted by rostaria:
“The daleks are not in this series. Moffat has put them on haitus.”

Sorry I meant to say "aren't in"
wizzywick
07-06-2011
Originally Posted by rostaria:
“The daleks are not in this series. Moffat has put them on haitus.”

Moffat also said that spoilers surrounding River's identity was totally and utterly false. He also said the cliffhanger at the end of episode 7 would be so huge we would suffer shockwaves! The truth is, Moffat lies!
rostaria
07-06-2011
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Moffat also said that spoilers surrounding River's identity was totally and utterly false. He also said the cliffhanger at the end of episode 7 would be so huge we would suffer shockwaves! The truth is, Moffat lies!”

Just because *You* didnt suffer from shockwaves doesnt mean other didnt. The Moff is hardly going to allow it to released in the papers that Daleks are not in this series.
grizzlyvamp
07-06-2011
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Moffat also said that spoilers surrounding River's identity was totally and utterly false. He also said the cliffhanger at the end of episode 7 would be so huge we would suffer shockwaves! The truth is, Moffat lies!”

It is true that the end didn't quite have the impact on me that had been promised, though the leak with her being Amy's child kinda didn't help! But I can guarentee you that if Moffat says there aren't going to be Daleks then there aren't going to be Daleks. End of discussion. Moffat may well have lied about the whole spoiler thing with Amy but has it never occured to you that maybe he was just trying to do damage limitation? Try and keep those who wanted to stay oblivious unsure? Or are you just one of those Moffat haters determined to see fault with him in every corner?
rostaria
07-06-2011
Originally Posted by grizzlyvamp:
“It is true that the end didn't quite have the impact on me that had been promised, though the leak with her being Amy's child kinda didn't help! But I can guarentee you that if Moffat says there aren't going to be Daleks then there aren't going to be Daleks. End of discussion. Moffat may well have lied about the whole spoiler thing with Amy but has it never occured to you that maybe he was just trying to do damage limitation? Try and keep those who wanted to stay oblivious unsure? Or are you just one of those Moffat haters determined to see fault with him in every corner?”

Yep. Like I said just because he lies doesnt mean he lies all the time.
sebbie3000
07-06-2011
Originally Posted by rostaria:
“Just because *You* didnt suffer from shockwaves doesnt mean other didnt. The Moff is hardly going to allow it to released in the papers that Daleks are not in this series.”

And he was talking about a specific 'set-report' spoiler re: River. Him denying that set-report means that he didn't lie - he just didn't tell you the fact that the relationship between Amy and River was right.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map