|
||||||||
Zoe - very nasty piece of work!! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,441
|
Quote:
MY personal attack on Zoe? I am talking about specific behaviour that I watched along with everyone else. Not entirely sure why you're singling my comments out here? I certainly don't call people airheads or non-entities, that's for sure.
I have replied to around 20 posts in this forum in the last 24 hours. That hardly makes your post singled out for a comment. This is a discussion forum and if you put up a post then you need to expect replies to it, and not all of them will be in agreement. Quote:
Admittedly, I did say I wasn't sure she was as intelligent as she thinks she is, and I thought in this instance she was behaving like a malicious cow, which to my mind was unprofessional and immature. But my comments are specific to the situation and her behaviour towards Susan, not a personal attack on Zoe.
And as a matter of fact, I was pretty impressed at the way she took responsibility for her failings in the boardroom. Personally, I prefer to look at behaviour in specific situations instead of making blanket judgements about people and ignoring anything that contradicts that. Neither unfair or unreasonable really. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dagenham Essex UK
Posts: 9,714
|
Now, this could be down to the editing, but Zoe frankly strikes me as someone totally out of her depth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,441
|
Quote:
Now, this could be down to the editing, but Zoe frankly strikes me as someone totally out of her depth.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,076
|
Quote:
Neither do I.
I have replied to around 20 posts in this forum in the last 24 hours. That hardly makes your post singled out for a comment. This is a discussion forum and if you put up a post then you need to expect replies to it, and not all of them will be in agreement. Yeah, of course you do |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,076
|
Quote:
I'll raise you.
Meanwhile, back on topic. I might not like Zoe's behaviour much, but agree, I'm not sure that I'd describe her as out of her depth really. She seems quite on the ball to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Titan Uranus
Posts: 31,966
|
Quote:
Now, this could be down to the editing, but Zoe frankly strikes me as someone totally out of her depth.
![]() When her back is against the wall that's when she tends to make things personal, taking shots at those she doesn't like. Like asking Susan if she wants to sabotage the task, and saying in the boardroom that she really didn't need Susan or Edna on the task at all. In a way I don't think that was really meant to impress Lord Sugar (good job really because I really don't think it did ), I think it was simply a way to take a shot at Susan and Edna to knock their confidence in a sly way.Plus in that battle of words she had with Natasha in their confessionals (shown on You're Fired), Natasha's comments were based on the tasks and were quite concise whereas Zoe's were just sarky insults, probably just to make herself look good for the cameras. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,486
|
Zoe also had a major problem with Natasha and vice versa, which only came to light on You're Fired. That seemed to have cooled although they never seem to be on the same team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,835
|
Zoe is vile and I really don't know what Glenn sees in her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dagenham Essex UK
Posts: 9,714
|
Quote:
Why do you say that ?
Pretty damn obvious really. Blubbing when things dont go her way, losing it big time when someone asks her a question. As I said in the post you quoted, it could all be down to the edit, but even if played up, you wonder at the mental toughness of a candidate when they break down like that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
Zoe is vile and I really don't know what Glenn sees in her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Blubbing when things dont go her way,
Quote:
losing it big time when someone asks her a question
She didn't lose it big time, and it wasn't just one question. She was dealing with Susan who, as ever, won't take responsibility for her own actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
She pulled it together for the next day, though, and although they lost they only just lost (by £6) so she actually performed well. She had it together in the boardroom, too, and didn't blame other people for mistakes she had made or whinge about how unfair it was. I'll allow someone a few moments of reaction at the end of the day, if they man up when it's needed.
She didn't lose it big time, and it wasn't just one question. She was dealing with Susan who, as ever, won't take responsibility for her own actions. She didn't perform well, her whole team performed well on the second day (but not well enough evidently). It was a team effort. She didn't give them any guidance at all as evidenced by Edna and Susan in the boardroom. She always loses it. She doesn't have any peoples skills at all from the way she spoke to Susan and Edna. And Glen in the previous episode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dagenham Essex UK
Posts: 9,714
|
Quote:
She pulled it together for the next day, .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
She didn't perform well, her whole team performed well on the second day (but not well enough evidently). It was a team effort. She didn't give them any guidance at all as evidenced by Edna and Susan in the boardroom.
She always loses it. She doesn't have any peoples skills at all from the way she spoke to Susan and Edna. And Glen in the previous episode. Zoe was very lucky not to go this week and the only reason she stayed was because she put herself up for PM and Sir Alan was impressed with that and that alone! Plus he did not like Ednas bragging of how qualified she was and dug her own grave, so to speak! I hope that Zoe goes next! She is definitely a nasty piece of work! |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
She pulled it together for the next day, though, and although they lost they only just lost (by £6) so she actually performed well. She had it together in the boardroom, too, and didn't blame other people for mistakes she had made or whinge about how unfair it was. I'll allow someone a few moments of reaction at the end of the day, if they man up when it's needed.
She didn't lose it big time, and it wasn't just one question. She was dealing with Susan who, as ever, won't take responsibility for her own actions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Sorry but how can you say that she did not lose it big time when she sat there crying when she made a massive mistake of not getting either of the two pitches!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
Maybe I misunderstood Tourista, but I hadn't thought "someone asking her a question" was referring to Zoe's moment of reaction in the evening. I thought it was about when Susan repeatedly asked a question that Zoe couldn't possibly know the answer to. My point was that it wasn't just one question, because Susan kept repeating it, and she didn't lose it big time, she merely got a bit more emphatic every time the question was asked. Susan never accepts she's done something wrong, so people sometimes feel they have to be emphatic to get through to her.
I was confused by this as Susan only asked twice of how much the stuff weighed. The first time was a question, and then she asked again perhaps asking Zoe to justify it. A simple, 'I really haven't a clue, what do you think?" would have been enough, rather than going off on one. Zoe behaved like a whiny school kid, I thought it was funny when later she said 'you just go on and on' when she was going on and on herself in her whiny voice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
I was confused by this as Susan only asked twice of how much the stuff weighed. The first time was a question, and then she asked again perhaps asking Zoe to justify it. A simple, 'I really haven't a clue, what do you think?" would have been enough, rather than going off on one.
Susan: "Zoe?" Zoe: "What?" Susan: "Would you say this room was worth a tonne?" [edit - scene setting montage which doesn't feel in-sequence] Zoe: "I genuinely know as much as you do." [cut] Susan: "Are you sure that doesn't go over one tonne?" Susan's second question seems bizarre to me. Why ask, "Are you sure?" when Zoe just said she didn't know. You suggest Susan wants Zoe to justify something, but what? She's not given a figure that she needs to justify.To me it's more as if Susan is ascribing some kind of skill or knowledge to Zoe that she doesn't have or claim to have. Doing it once was perhaps understandable, but then asking "Are you sure" seems like it is putting words into Zoe's mouth: Susan's question would only make sense if Zoe had stated it was under a tonne. On this show, candidates need to be careful about not over-committing themselves; perhaps Susan is trying to set up Zoe for the boardroom by making it look like she made a wrong estimate, or perhaps Zoe is over-zealous when she clarifies her position because she is concerned that might happen. I agree Zoe over-reacts (although I strongly suspect that a lot of stuff we didn't see lies behind that), and gets emphatic. A simple one-sentence answer didn't work, so she makes her point at more length: she doesn't know and can't be expected to know. Susan's response isn't to back down or apologise or otherwise try to mollify her, but to go on the offensive. Zoe: "Susie, will you understand: I have not got weighing ..." Susan: "No." Zoe: "... scales in my head..." Susan: "No, I know that". Zoe: "I do not know how long it takes to rip out buildings, I do not know..." Susan, Zoe and Edna talk over each other. Susan: "I'm just asking you a simple question." Zoe doesn't swear, shout or say anything insulting or untrue, which is what "losing it big time" means to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,839
|
I like Zoe.
In the first two weeks she didn't open her mouth, but that was maybe down to editing. Since then, she has come on in leaps and bounds and shown herself to be a good organiser. Admittedly she dropped a clanger in her perception of this task, but rallied the next day and had the guts to openly say that she had stuffed it up in the boardroom. Unlike Jim last week who admitted no part in the downfall of his team. I think LordSirAlan likes her and I think she will go far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
There was almost certainly more to it than we saw. The first time Zoe's answer is quite mild, along the lines you suggest:
Susan: "Zoe?" Zoe: "What?" Susan: "Would you say this room was worth a tonne?" [edit - scene setting montage which doesn't feel in-sequence] Zoe: "I genuinely know as much as you do." [cut] Susan: "Are you sure that doesn't go over one tonne?" Susan's second question seems bizarre to me. Why ask, "Are you sure?" when Zoe just said she didn't know. You suggest Susan wants Zoe to justify something, but what? She's not given a figure that she needs to justify.To me it's more as if Susan is ascribing some kind of skill or knowledge to Zoe that she doesn't have or claim to have. Doing it once was perhaps understandable, but then asking "Are you sure" seems like it is putting words into Zoe's mouth: Susan's question would only make sense if Zoe had stated it was under a tonne. On this show, candidates need to be careful about not over-committing themselves; perhaps Susan is trying to set up Zoe for the boardroom by making it look like she made a wrong estimate, or perhaps Zoe is over-zealous when she clarifies her position because she is concerned that might happen. I agree Zoe over-reacts (although I strongly suspect that a lot of stuff we didn't see lies behind that), and gets emphatic. A simple one-sentence answer didn't work, so she makes her point at more length: she doesn't know and can't be expected to know. Susan's response isn't to back down or apologise or otherwise try to mollify her, but to go on the offensive. Zoe: "Susie, will you understand: I have not got weighing ..." Susan: "No." Zoe: "... scales in my head..." Susan: "No, I know that". Zoe: "I do not know how long it takes to rip out buildings, I do not know..." Susan, Zoe and Edna talk over each other. Susan: "I'm just asking you a simple question." Zoe doesn't swear, shout or say anything insulting or untrue, which is what "losing it big time" means to me. I think that you are over analysing this too much. Of course we can only go by what we see on TV, if this is an argument about what we don't see with regards to edits, then anything goes: one could argue that Zoe threw a massive tantrum that was edited out. But from what we do see, Zoe definitely over reacted in a rude and brash manner. Sometimes we ask questions twice, or even think out loud, which I thought was what Susan was doing. Her and Edna both looked shocked when Zoe acted the way she did. Zoe went off on one whining for ages. Zoe also told a blatant LIE in the boardroom when she said to Lord Sugar that Susan was asking her questions when she was trying to negotiate a price, when in actual fact Susan asked her questions when they were analysing the rubbish by themselves. What's more, she kept on saying 'we got the appointments' when it was Edna who did. I really do respect your opinion brangdon, but on this particular occasion, I simply can't think how anyone can possibly stick up for Zoe with her whiny tone of voice, doing impressions while rolling her eyes and laughing at other candidates, lying, and constantly belittling Susan. Zoe's the kind of person I never want to associate myself with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
There are two possibilities here;
1) Susan asked this question, or other questions that Zoe found equally bothersome and pointless, far more than we saw. 2) What we saw Susan ask is all she did ask We have no real way of knowing which one is the case, and I would be wary of making any judgements on either woman based on this incident. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 7,251
|
I don't know if it's down to the way the show is edited, but I find Zoe entirely unlikable, and a miserable moody mare to boot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
|
Quote:
I don't know if it's down to the way the show is edited, but I find Zoe entirely unlikable, and a miserable moody mare to boot.
I wouldnt touch her with my bargepole or anyone else's. Shes just inviting a headache into your life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,073
|
Quote:
Susan's second question seems bizarre to me. Why ask, "Are you sure?" when Zoe just said she didn't know. You suggest Susan wants Zoe to justify something, but what? She's not given a figure that she needs to justify.To me it's more as if Susan is ascribing some kind of skill or knowledge to Zoe that she doesn't have or claim to have. Doing it once was perhaps understandable, but then asking "Are you sure" seems like it is putting words into Zoe's mouth: Susan's question would only make sense if Zoe had stated it was under a tonne. On this show, candidates need to be careful about not over-committing themselves; perhaps Susan is trying to set up Zoe for the boardroom by making it look like she made a wrong estimate, or perhaps Zoe is over-zealous when she clarifies her position because she is concerned that might happen.
I agree Zoe over-reacts (although I strongly suspect that a lot of stuff we didn't see lies behind that), and gets emphatic. A simple one-sentence answer didn't work, so she makes her point at more length: she doesn't know and can't be expected to know. Susan's response isn't to back down or apologise or otherwise try to mollify her, but to go on the offensive. Zoe: "Susie, will you understand: I have not got weighing ..." Susan: "No." Zoe: "... scales in my head..." Susan: "No, I know that". Zoe: "I do not know how long it takes to rip out buildings, I do not know..." Susan, Zoe and Edna talk over each other. Susan: "I'm just asking you a simple question." Zoe doesn't swear, shout or say anything insulting or untrue, which is what "losing it big time" means to me. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:18.






), I think it was simply a way to take a shot at Susan and Edna to knock their confidence in a sly way.