|
||||||||
Jim and Natasha most interesting candidates but too risky for business |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,294
|
Jim and Natasha most interesting candidates but too risky for business
You never know what you will get with these two, but you feel that they would be too much of a risk for LAS.
They would either piss the money up the wall or make millions. A lot of safe hiding people still around |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
You never know what you will get with these two, but you feel that they would be too much of a risk for LAS.
They would either piss the money up the wall or make millions. A lot of safe hiding people still around Jims team blew it tonight, they had the best concept but Zoes name was a disaster and Jims reluctance to cut his prices was the real reason they lost. I liked Jim to start with but I am now sick of him making excuses for himself and putting others in it when it is his own fault! I am just so shocked that Jim got to stay, especially when it seems that Sir Alan has been gunning for him for awhile now. I honestly thought that he would have taken his chance and got rid of him this week! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,294
|
Quote:
I really cannot stand Natasha, she is far too crude for my liking and so, so common. I think that she was very lucky tonight!
Jims team blew it tonight, they had the best concept but Zoes name was a disaster and Jims reluctance to cut his prices was the real reason they lost. I liked Jim to start with but I am now sick of him making excuses for himself and putting others in it when it is his own fault! I am just so shocked that Jim got to stay, especially when it seems that Sir Alan has been gunning for him for awhile now. I honestly thought that he would have taken his chance and got rid of him this week! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,294
|
Also looking forward to seeing these two on Your Fired
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
Natasha was lucky she only won by about 40 grand
I think that Natasha is far too hard faced and definitely not Sir Alans type, well thats my opinion anyway! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,294
|
Quote:
Yes, she might have got a big deal of 60 grand but the other 2 did not like it at all. Like last week it was luck of the draw.
I think that Natasha is far too hard faced and definitely not Sir Alans type, well thats my opinion anyway!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
|
Natasha's pretty bland. All I hear come out of her mouth is "yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah!" and she's obstinate and lucky.
It's quite fascinating watching Jim in action though, I'd like him to stay til the interviews, and think he will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
Natasha's pretty bland. All I hear come out of her mouth is "yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah!" and she's obstinate and lucky.
It's quite fascinating watching Jim in action though, I'd like him to stay til the interviews, and think he will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Oxfordshire
Posts: 11,632
|
Jim is incompetent and pig-headedly wrong about almost everything. He's also a name caller and a bully. His team lost tonight only because he completely refused to doscount his rate card at the first agency. Each agency actually picked his magazine as the winner, he won 2 out of the 3 rounds, the 2 where he offered a discount. It was his pig-headed stubborness that meant he earned not a penny from that meeting. Everyone knows that all agencies expect a massive discount even from a top publication. Even if he had discounted by more than 50% he would still have won because his total card cost was £103K, so he could sell the space out at £50K and come out the winner. He blew it. Then Sugar blew it by firing completely the wrong person - obviously the producers want Jim in the show because he's so aggressive, or passive-aggressive to coin a phrase.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:18.

