|
||||||||
I don't think that was a valid reason to fire Glenn |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In my Opinion
Posts: 10,057
|
Quote:
It's Sugar's money. He can pick anyone for any reason. I don't see the point of the outrage.
In other words, without us, there's no programme and therefore no 'free' publicity for Sugar - capiche?:sleep: |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,481
|
Just because he was an engineer was an appalling reason to fire Glenn. Sugar is full of contradictions . On other Apprentices he says he doesn't want salespeople or accountants and now engineers . I mean how many professions is he opposed too.
Jim was totally responsible for the failure of this task and should have gone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 105
|
Granted, Glenn hadn't really been the strongest candidate recently, but I still saw potential. It was a pathetic excuse that he was back in the boardroom, let alone fired.
I'm genuinely surprised, and slightly appauled, that Jim didn't go after the way he spoke to Nick (and to a lesser degree, the way he spoke to Karen). Surely he can't last much longer in the process, particularly if he keeps this attitude of sorts up? |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
Granted, Glenn hadn't really been the strongest candidate recently, but I still saw potential. It was a pathetic excuse that he was back in the boardroom, let alone fired.
I'm genuinely surprised, and slightly appauled, that Jim didn't go after the way he spoke to Nick (and to a lesser degree, the way he spoke to Karen). Surely he can't last much longer in the process, particularly if he keeps this attitude of sorts up? Wotherspoon, Sophocles, Pantsman, Baggs, and now Jim. Either Sugar is very easily taken in by certain rather brash people or he is not being entirely honest when he says he doesn't keep people in because they make good TV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 267
|
Some people have suggested it was done because he does not make good TV
That might have already been said on here I did not read the rest of the replies |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 25
|
Glenn's sacking on The Apprentice gets revised to something different on You're Fired's clip of it. The only thing they have in common is Glenn was fired because he was an engineer.
We see two version's of LS's preamble to firing him. |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
|
Quote:
As a concept I thought it was very good and it could have worked out really well if Zoe's idea had been followed through.
What Jim made of it is what made it bad. I thought Jim showed his true colours in the boardroom. I'm surprised any of them are still speaking to him! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27.



