|
||||||||
natasha makes me feel sick |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
|
As long as she fancies other women, thats fine by me ........ the male gene pool can do without the likes of her.
According to my dog she is 'Ruff!!!' |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,154
|
I had forgotten Natasha was a Lesbian but I thought her approach was quite crass and common especially for a woman.
She is the one I have disliked from the start and she has come up with several stupid remarks over the weeks. Horrible skin, make up and even when she dresses business like there is an air of downmarket about her. Cant stand the whine either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 647
|
She went for the lowest common denominator, yeah, because sex sells, yeah. I think she was very lucky to win, yeah, and was that mainly because Jim stuffed up the marketing and branding of his fremium?
Not hugely impressed with her performance last night. Yeah. Didn't realise she was a lesbian but I dont see what it has to do with anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In the real world
Posts: 1,163
|
Quote:
According to my dog she is 'Ruff!!!'
![]() I quite liked the fact that Natasha used the 'lads mag' episode as an excuse to show vast expanses of cleavage at every opportunity. Works for me! ![]() (Lecherous? Check. Honest? Check. About to be pounced on by the DS forums Daily Hate reading hordes for daring to say there's nowt wrong with a bit of cleavage to brighten up a chap's evening? Check.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 277
|
Yeah, she's pretty annoying, yeah?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,270
|
Quote:
She went for the lowest common denominator, yeah, because sex sells, yeah. I think she was very lucky to win, yeah, and was that mainly because Jim stuffed up the marketing and branding of his fremium?
Not hugely impressed with her performance last night. Yeah. Didn't realise she was a lesbian but I dont see what it has to do with anything. I will make a prediction they wont win but Jim and Natasha will get something out of being on the show |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9,688
|
Didn't one of the losing candidates last year do a downmarket photo shoot? That's the only sort of thing I can see Natasha getting out of the Apprentice as she's really not suited for the media/motivational speaking line of work. I can see Jim doing well out of the notoriety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
I'll elaborate,
Homophobic because of the ugly suggestion that a lesbian is incapable of controlling their sexual desire, thereby relegating the homosexual from the status of a human being to that of a lust-driven automaton. I'll grant that the class-hatred was tacitly implied, rather than the explicit homophobia. Since habits and manners are signifiers of class (or at least class-background), I think we can surmise that such mordant contempt for Natasha's vocabulary and behaviour betray a general prejudice against those of a working-class background. For this reason, Natasha's merits as a candidate are ignored. Instead, we have the latte-drinking class venting their prejudice against an uppity prole attempting to rise above her station. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Quote:
She isnt a lesbian she is bi apparently not sure why any of the above is significant
I will make a prediction they wont win but Jim and Natasha will get something out of being on the show I just didn't like how eager she was to make a 'lads mag' (said in her dreadful mockney voice), and see scantily clad women draped all over the cover... It was clear that the other team members weren't totally on board with the idea, and she totally ignored the focus groups, blinded by her incessant desire to create this downmarket and slightly distasteful magazine...How to blow your load, although funny, was extremely inappropriate...She thinks that her opinions trump everyone elses, which is not a good attitude to take as PM... She is my least favourite candidate... |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,325
|
I hadn't thought sexuality has been a factor on TA - she is a tad annoying, but it is nothing to do with what she likes in the bedroom. 'porn sells' is not a business mantra (even if true) - the ad adage is 'sex sells' and whilst the presentation was a bit 90s and hardly Esquire, done well, it could have been seen as 'tongue in cheek' - but alas it wasn't done well.
the 'blow your load' idea whilst crude, was again not well presented - if they had emphasised that high-end watches, expensive cars and designer fashion was what they had in mind - rather than a Kleenex - they might have got away with the tackiness of the title. probably the internet has changed the environment for such mags - with free porn online, there is bound to be less demand for any 'jizz-mag lite' - the mag for w-nkers who won't simply admit it. FHM etc still sell on sexiness, yet you can't imagine that any 13 year old with a computer can't get his sticky fingers/mouse on anything he wants. by the time blokes are ready for FHM, they are already half-blind... Poor old Nick, missing out on the glamour model half removing her briefs - Karren is nothing like as good as Margaret would have been in making it amusing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Howich
Posts: 13,318
|
I didn't know she was gay, I just thought the whole thing was gross and disgusting.
How are the womwen who work in the offices with these "work hard play hard" type men supposed to feel, with pictures of "saucy secretraies" doing the rounds?? are there no women in the office, or are we supposed to think it's ok to have this kind of trash in the workplace? I thought it was low-rent, low-value, lowest-common denomenator crap.... and I don't care what your sexuality is - if you think that's a godd representation of women in business, you need to get your head read |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,407
|
Quote:
I'll elaborate,
Homophobic because of the ugly suggestion that a lesbian is incapable of controlling their sexual desire, thereby relegating the homosexual from the status of a human being to that of a lust-driven automaton. I'll grant that the class-hatred was tacitly implied, rather than the explicit homophobia. Since habits and manners are signifiers of class (or at least class-background), I think we can surmise that such mordant contempt for Natasha's vocabulary and behaviour betray a general prejudice against those of a working-class background. For this reason, Natasha's merits as a candidate are ignored. Instead, we have the latte-drinking class venting their prejudice against an uppity prole attempting to rise above her station. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,428
|
Quote:
I didn't know she was gay, I just thought the whole thing was gross and disgusting.
How are the womwen who work in the offices with these "work hard play hard" type men supposed to feel, with pictures of "saucy secretraies" doing the rounds?? are there no women in the office, or are we supposed to think it's ok to have this kind of trash in the workplace? I thought it was low-rent, low-value, lowest-common denomenator crap.... and I don't care what your sexuality is - if you think that's a godd representation of women in business, you need to get your head read
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,840
|
Quote:
Wow, class-hatred and homophobia.
Not sure it's actually worth responding to something as cheap and nasty as this, but I should just point out that if Natasha was so desperate to see "some knickers down", she might well have appointed herself to photograph the glamour model, but she didn't so your point is easily dismissed. Wouldn't you have loved it if she was black or Asian and you could have accused me of racism as well. There's no homophobia or class hatred from me, just a hatred of something as tacky, dated and crude as her magazine and attitude throughout. Like I said, her whole attitude was like some outdated teacher trying way too hard to sound relevent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,840
|
And I didn't know she was gay (or bisexual) at all. I just thought as someone else said, she was 'ruff' in that respect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sussex
Posts: 12,173
|
her sexuality is totally irrellevent, she's just very very irritating.
Yeah? |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ¥
Posts: 1,720
|
There is something quite unpleasant and seedy about her
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,270
|
Quote:
There is something quite unpleasant and seedy about her
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ¥
Posts: 1,720
|
Quote:
Can you get seedy women
![]() ![]() she seems to buck the trend, so to speak. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 14
|
I think her accent is more annoying than Melody's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hell of Upside Down Sinners
Posts: 263
|
For all her faults, Natasha does possess colossal jugs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,366
|
I love the bit where she was directing the dog food commercial, and she wanted to show how he wanted the dog to run across the garden, and she proceeded to show exactly how, but running all the way across the garden, the camera guy was smirking which cracked me up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
|
From what I can gather, Natasha seems to be a parody of what a business person is like rather than actually being one.
The magazine idea is a great example. As if you have a faint and vague idea what magazine editors say or do and then imitate it, I don't know, I don't really like her very much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
From what I can gather, Natasha seems to be a parody of what a business person is like rather than actually being one.
The magazine idea is a great example. As if you have a faint and vague idea what magazine editors say or do and then imitate it, I don't know, I don't really like her very much. She's sort of an an impersonator, but not a very good one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,270
|
I bet her and Jim get something out of this if as likely they don't win.
There are arguably the two biggest characters in the show, but far too risky as winners. He will hire one of the blandies as usual. Have all the winners been bland I think they have |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07.





