|
||||||||
The DS Apprentice: You're Fired - Week Two |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
The DS Apprentice: You're Fired - Week Two
Hi, I'm Val, and join me and the contributors tonight after the shock firing of Strictly Irish!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
So - did you all think Louise should have gone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,850
|
I personally don't!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
Delayed - what's happening now?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Real World
Posts: 847
|
I'd say that she probably shouldn't have gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
Definitely - she was eliminated because of an absence - and new teams!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Real World
Posts: 847
|
So now we know our teams and our fired candidate, do we begin the discussion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 43,726
|
Hello Everyone
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
Yes!
Who in everybody's opinion - should have been fired. In my opinion it would have to be Black Dagger - in that his pitch was gangly and awkward, and the poster didn't advertise Derby. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 43,726
|
I thought the right person left...
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,850
|
Based on this task and the boardroom discussion, I'd have thought BD was a dead cert to be fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 873
|
Sorry I'm late
xxx
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
That's OK. Yes, shocks all around! Both 'Why I Fired Them' and 'The One That Got Away' pieces coming up soon!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Real World
Posts: 847
|
Who should have been fired? A very difficult question:
The right three were in the boardroom. That's pretty certain for me. But I don't think Louise should have gone. She has potential and has a perfectly good reason to be absence. That said, I don't think she should have been project manager, but for me it should have been Black Dagger of Poth. Both performed poorly once again, Black Dagger coming out with the (awful) poster, and Poth not answering the questions as well as possible and making a few slip ups. I don't think either will win, and I could well have fired both had I been in Lord Sugar's position. I will be very interested to see how both of them perform next week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,223
|
Why I Fired Them
LORD SUGAR
Firing Louise was a tough decision because I know she had other more important commitments then this task. But, ultimately, she was the PM and her team relied on her when she wasn't there. She didn't seem to lead the team by being absent and the fact it was the second task in a row made me question if she could be available as much as the others. It was mainly because she was absent as PM and with her skills she definitely was an important part of the team. I wish her all the best, but that's why I fired her. What do we think of that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 16,438
|
I do understand why she fired, but I still think she should've been given a shot to be here. IMO, Luke has had two 'off' tasks in a row, out of two, which is just no good!!
Also - sorry Val! I didn't see this thread until just now. ![]() Maybe soon you'll have a fired candidate who will be here to give an interview.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:02.



xxx