Originally Posted by trollface:
“And, in Vincent's case, he was fired for it.”
I would have accepted it if Melody got fired for it. Even with Leon's entire contribution being giving "LOL I'M DOING NOTHING! *peace sign*" interviews to camera. I think she's a bit lucky that there was an individual sales element to the task where she could shine (Vincent was clearly a strong salesman as much as Karren pulled poo-face to try to persuade us otherwise) but also she had a stronger past record to fall back on than Vincent did in that she had a prior victory as PM, some task wins and no prior Boardroom appearance and he had none of that.
Quote:
“Well, I'm going to offer a semantic quibble and say that I think it is active sabotage, although sabotage isn't what Vincent or Melody tried to do. But they certainly did actively sabotage the task by their own actions (again, Vincent less because he was gathering information for himself, rather than passing on information to the decision maker).”
If it's a semantic quibble I will amend my phrasing to "deliberate sabotage", which is probably more what I was going for.
Quote:
“ I agree that it's not malicious, though. What it is is egotism. Vincent was in love with his own idea, and Melody was just convinced that she was right about what would sell well in Paris, despite not having done the research on the company she was asked to research, and not having seen the product itself. She just had to be right about it because, well, she's Melody and has worked with every notable historical figure since Jesus. How could she possibly be wrong? She's Melody! So when the things she was being told didn't fit her narrative, she changed the facts to suit the narrative, and then didn't try to research much harder for fear of being further contradicted.”
Agreed - it's her biggest weakness (and the biggest weakness of a lot of women who've got her sort of edit - Saira, DebraBarr, Claire). I eagerly await her redemption arc (looks like she and Tom are fast friends next week from the previews) and eventual 2nd/3rd place finish.
Quote:
“Of course, Tom isn't blameless and should have put his foot down, although I think that Natasha could have been the deciding factor there. If it had just been Leon and Melody who said they didn't like the seat, then he might have dismissed their opinion because they hadn't seen it, but Natasha had and didn't like it either. He should have trusted himself more, but I'm not sure that he didn't act in a reasonable way. He was kind of the anti-Melody in the task, if you will.”
I think my problem is that Tom's now had a good 6 weeks or so of constant feedback of "you're right, everyone else is wrong, trust your instincts, push your ideas through, you've got good instincts". This was the week that he should have pushed all his chips in and gone for broke. As it is, unless his business plan is blow-away great, I think he might have just about blown it. Natasha's opinion surely weighs pretty much less than an atom's weight at this point doesn't it?
Quote:
“Mind you, how stupid and artificial the whole process is hasn't ever been more blatant, I don't think. I mean, who on Earth does market research when the only people who have seen the products are actually in a different country? How can you do market research on a product you've not only never seen, but barely know anything about?”
I guess they were going for broke on hilarious "culture clash" footage and didn't trust these people with only one day's worth of blundering around.