• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Gadgets
  • TV and Home Entertainment Technology
Optical or Co-Ax?
Filthy the Dog
20-08-2004
At the moment I've hooked up my DVD player to my amp with the co-ax digital connection.

The sound's great, my amp recognises DTS, Dolby 5:1, etc. from the source but...

...both also have the option to connect via optical output/input.

Would this mean an improvement?
Any big differences between the two soundqualitywise?
Is one better than the other?
Chparmar
20-08-2004
Originally Posted by Filthy the Dog:
“
Would this mean an improvement?
Any big differences between the two soundqualitywise?
Is one better than the other?”

The differences cancel each other out.
What matters the most really is the type of cable you use.

I use always use IXOS for my cabling needs.
engaged
20-08-2004
Actually, there is a large difference between the two.

With an optical signal, the digital signal must be converted from electrical to optical at the source, then sent optically along the optical cable, then converted back again from an optical to an electrical signal at the amplifier end. It undergoes conversion twice.

Using co-ax, the signal is simply sent along the cable with no need for the conversion that the optical requires; hence reduced error, jitter, etc. Also, there is more of a length limit using the optical.
Tim.C
21-08-2004
Actually, co-ax also has conversions.

The co-ax has different impedence to the 'wiring' inside the box. It also goes through lossy electrical connectors.

I reckon it's not such a big differene as you suggest.

And then add in that the co-ax is vunerable to electrical noise, and cross talk from other nearby leads - with optical isn't - my money is on it's not so simple to distinguish a clear winner.

Also, normally optical can cover greater distances than electrical - one of the reasons it's used for netwrok backbones !

Hmmmmm

I'm intrigued now............


Tim.C
TrevorPH
21-08-2004
I couldn't use an optical connection from my old Meridian 200 CD player to the 208 DAC because every time the central heating turned on, it made a load pop. Didn't do this when changing it to use the coax connection while leaving everything else identical. Never managed to work out what this meant but it's another piece of data.
engaged
21-08-2004
Originally Posted by Tim.C:
“Actually, co-ax also has conversions.

The co-ax has different impedence to the 'wiring' inside the box. It also goes through lossy electrical connectors.

I reckon it's not such a big differene as you suggest.

And then add in that the co-ax is vunerable to electrical noise, and cross talk from other nearby leads - with optical isn't - my money is on it's not so simple to distinguish a clear winner.

Also, normally optical can cover greater distances than electrical - one of the reasons it's used for netwrok backbones !

Hmmmmm

I'm intrigued now............


Tim.C”

Fair point(s). Must admit that I was only reiterating what I've come across at more hifi focused forums - at Hi-Fi Choice and AV Forums. I get the impression there that coax is the preferred flavour, due mainly to the reduced risk of jitter and error in the signal.
bronx2282
21-08-2004
The guy at my local hi-fi shop (Practical Hi-Fi) told me that optical had the 'edge' over coaxial.

I did have a really good argument about using optical a while ago but I've forgotton it now .
Jim Rae
22-08-2004
On a day to day basis, you won't hear any difference...
cyberdog
27-08-2004
agree with Mr Rae...
you won't hear any difference, so use whichever is most convenient.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map