please!

David brent was hilarious. Natasha is just clueless and useless all rolled into one. It is a miracle she lasted this long on the show when stronger candidates were kicked out

Its a strange one always gets a bad edit but always survives.

Unlesss she is the one that has the best interview and best business idea

Stranger things have happened

It's sad that Natasha is still there, she is completely out of her depth.it was a pity her team won.

Maybe but the idea was you were laughing at him not with him and the same can certainly be said for Natasha. Even more when you're laughing at her so called business acumen and business speach.

I was torn because I wanted her team to lose (so that she could be fired) but I don't think Susan or Jim would have deserved to be on the losing team. It was a shame that those two didn't get their treat at least as it was Natasha that was the 'cautious carol', and, she doesn't have more than Melody overal.

Exactly......Jim & Susan worked really hard...while Natasha just stood & wrote in that stupid book! LS really made a mistake for not firing her the first time she was taken to the boardroom by Felicity. LS should have kept Felicity (who was more decent & capable).

But Felicity really had shown her weaknesses, and Sugar probably thought he'd get plenty of opportunities to fire Natasha. He's never had a chance to fire her in a week that he could possibly have justified doing it.

I think cancelling the treat was unfair too, by the way. Jim and Susan had earned it if Natasha hadn't.

I agree with this.

Natasha is definatly weaker than Susan now.

Natasha will go and two front runners Jim and Helen and the two 'nice' ones Tom and Ssuan will be left.

I'm so looking forward to Jim in the interview process, there's going to be so much BS flying around, I think it will resemble the ending of Scarface!

Agreed - seemed like a stunt Trump would pull to me

Also previously the winning team still got their treat even when they won with a bluddy loss - eg the selling task in series 5.

He must have known the fine wouldn't be enough to make them lose. If it had, the whole show would've lost all credibility. To affect the outcome of a task by imposing a totally arbitrary fine when they hadn't actually broken any rules would undermine the entire 'process'.

I think he cancelled the treat because he was raging that they won. I honestly think he wanted that team to lose and was really gunning for Natasha. He was fuming that he would have to fire one from the other team.

And there debrief after they won, was very telling, were Nat was still blaming Susan for bad sells.

Haha! Maybe that's why he mixed the teams up and gave Helen to the others?

She should definitely have gone at the beginning of the Apprentice . It shows a fundamental flaw in the show when a very poor candidate can escape firing week after week by just being on the winning team and on the backs of better candidates.

Or "toad" for "told" and "soad" for "sold".

Only cos I'm from Taunton myself, and I cringe at that accent, it's the roughest, commonest, horriblest way of speaking. I know that makes me sound awful, but I just can't help cringing. In the same way shop staff say "thanking you!" rather than "thank you". I just wish they'd learn to talk properly.... but I think it hits a nerve because it's my home town making me cringe with its improper way of speaking.

As for Natasha having free school meals and uniform tokens, so what? My family qualified for that too. (Well my brother did; I was at a public school on a full scholarship so things were slightly different for me.) I too had a job outside my school hours (harder, because my school hours were 8am - 5pm or later unlike the hours of a state school) and I too was the first in my family to go to uni. And I run my own business too.

Not that this makes me a saint, but it means I have no sympathy for Natasha doing so in the same circumstances and the same town.

She's nothing special. Remember, I "toad" you so.

Very probably.