• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Natasha....true colours last night?
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
mimi123456
08-07-2011
Originally Posted by LeoJoe6:
“Personally I don't believe in this 'true colours' thing - people always react differently under different situations, pressures, and stresses. Natasha I think is very insecure, and secretly knows she is out of her depth, which causes her to lash out quite heavily when she feels she is being attacked. Natasha felt threatened by Susan questioning her and so Natasha automatically goes into offense is the best defense mode.”

Well Jim and Helen were very mouthy to her last week in the bisucuit task. She didn't lash out, just sat in the corner like a pleb. So I don't quite believe that! Helen more or less said shut the fcuk up you silly cow.

I know it's all about being professional and what not, but I was raring for Susan to smack Natasha or headbutt her or something. When people verbally attack Susan like Zoe or Natasha, everyone says Susan is a whiny brat when she tries to defend herself. Err. Anyway, it was so obvious Sugah wanted to get rid of Natasha. She will deffo be going next week. Fingers crossed
allafix
08-07-2011
Originally Posted by Jepson:
“Jim sold until he ran out of stock.

He then spent exactly as much time restocking as was left.

It would have made no difference if he'd restocked earlier except that he would have moved the selling hiatus earlier in the day when his pitch - Shepherd's Bush Market - would have been much busier and so he would almost certainly have lost trade overall.”

My main point was that Natasha, in her inifinite wisdom, stopped Jim re-stocking as recommended by Lord Sugar. So she wasn't managing Jim well as claimed.

Potentially it would make a difference, because he would have had more to sell and unsold stock was not penalised. You've go more chance to sell things with a stall full of stock than one with a last few remaining.

Apart from anything else he would have earned brownie points for the team by re-investing and maybe even avoided the fine and saved the treat.
brangdon
08-07-2011
Originally Posted by Takae:
“You can hear the cogs turning in his head in that clip: "What benefits will I get from defending Susan and pointing out Natasha's mistakes? None. Say nothing."”

Jim wasn't actually present when Susan confronted Natasha about jumping into her sales. He was at his own pitch that day. He had no basis for defending Susan. For all he knew, Susan might have been a right pain, and may indeed have distracted Natasha causing her bad decisions.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map