1. Edward
2. Alex
3. Gavin
4. Felicity
5. Ellie
6. Vincent


I think Felicity.....we just did not see enough of her.

Maybe Edward at a push.

But Alex, Felicity and Ellie weren't good candidates by any stretch of the imagine.

And Gavin and Vincent I could care less about.

Anyway, Natasha and Tom are deserving candidates. They have shown gumption, flare, creativity and all-round business nous.

Felicty & Gavin

They made like 1 mistake D:

Edward's my choice, purely for comic value.

Gavin and Felicity. Both were fired far too early.

Edward was farcical and not even slightly humorous.
Alex was a total non-entity, only springing to life in the boardroom. Too little too late.
Ellie did nothing but mouth off. All attitude and no substance.
Vincent had all the bravado, but nothing to back it up.

At a push Ellie or Vincent. Maybe Alex if you want to give him the same opportunity that was granted to Zoe - to overcome a quiet beginning. All of the other three were utterly inept PMs and Felicity contributed a number of deeply flawed ideas to other tasks as well (not spending all the seed money in task 1, crappy lead after crappy lead in Task 3). She was also the genesis of the AmpiApp, although that one could I guess be argued either way.

Felicity.

I still find her 'Not even one penny off!" rant funny. Anyone who likes to compare herself with Kanya King is all right with me, too.

Felicity - She seemed alright really, and may have become a solid candidate.

Gavin was all mouth, and no delivery - slating everybody elses team leading skills, and made a right hash of his own - lost control completely, and just couldn't man up to the task.

Felicity and Gavin for me but i think Tom deserves to be there still - Natasha is a complete waste of space!

She got just about everything on the Beauty task she was fired for.

I think possibly Vincent wasn't as bad as he was made out to be, but I wouldn't say he deserved to reach task 10. Melody should have gone instead of Zoe, and Leon is probably stronger than Natasha, but they aren't from the first 6.

All of those candidates except Alex and Edward were better than Natasha and Tom.

I'd prefer Gavin to be there instead of Natasha.

But I think Tom deserves his place.

Gavin was absolutely awful

I think he made the wrong decision firing Edna over Zoe but that's it really.

I thought he had potential. He just PMed the wrong task.

And I liked his specs...

Natasha actually has a decent record and she's got the required drive. If you don't buy into the supposed mistake in the last task, she doesn't look that misplaced - even if she starts as number 5 in the last 5. If Zoe had let Susan lead last week, she would still have been there, and on the evidence of similar past tasks she might have taken advantage of Helen making her big error this week - she got close to Helen in the most similar task. Zoe would also now be sharing with Susan the role of the person who had run a business already. Tom looks like a finalist for a prize involving business plans - but on overall performance and muck ups he should have gone last week or even sooner if the show means anything.

I don't think any of the first 6 deserve to be there now. Some were simply awful and there's too little evidence for the others .

None.