I agree that the focus on Natasha was quite relentless tonight.
But my one observation about her is that she is quite a tightly wrapped individual which means that she delivers almost scripted responses to everything.
And these types of responses, almost media trained (the way I was when a corporate, so I can spot it a mile off) do not actually give anything out, or back.
It was almost as if the were all gradually turning up their dials on her perhaps to stimulate a response, whcih was not forthcoming
While in the programmes themselves, I was wondering if she was demonstrating outstanding corporate b/s all the time (or rehearsing for a job in a 1970's Trade Union, Fred Kite's assistant, perhaps?).
At times, I wanted to shake her and say 'lighten up' or 'break out of this'.
In many ways she was the perfect Stepford Corporate.
And as I write I realise that she projects a humourless image. She is clearly bright but not very quick witted, well her public persona isn't, at least.
But the 3 panelists although relentless were still quite warm to her; probably it was Ed Byrne who was the harshest (a comedian again!!).
Overall, maybe Natasha just didn't care anymore? Especially bearing in mind that it was 6 months after?
I was watching her face when she was in camera but not talking and she didn't look engaged in things at all.