Originally Posted by marvola45:
“The weeks leading up do have a point though - they get rid of the 'worst' performer each week. If someone loses every task but performs well, they survive - like Tom.
It may not be the best system, because you end up with people like Natasha in the final five who has been average at best throughout, but so far, the overall best performers have made the final two. S4 excepted. Maybe.”
Except the definition of worst is very subjective, Lord Sugar has people he wants to go, and it allows people to survive after they have demonstrated they shouldn't win and Lord Sugar has marked their cards appropriately. .
Tom should have gone in week 8 for probably the most ineffectual PM perfromance in Apprentice History. That suggested he couldn't possibly run a business - except with constant supervision. He then should have gone for ruining the product in week 9, by going off on his own and changing the concept to a cheap biscuit. Both weeks indicated someone out of their depth in management and with a butterfly mind that couldn't stay focused on what was needed. He's still showing the same traits this week - looking at babygros for images of britishness and confidently reinventing history - showing how narrow his skills base is doing so. He doesn't go in week 8 - because Melody makes some clangers too and Leon commits the ultimate sin of doing nothing - which trumps doing everything badly. He doesn't go in week 9, because Zoe can't compete with either Helen or Susan after losing to Helen again as PM, and Lord Sugar doesn't need her, or Melody, in what would have been all female final interviews. That doesn't make Tom a stronger candidate - indeed Zoe almost certainly is, and Melody and several males do everything he can't do much better.