Originally Posted by Jedikiah:
“The recent revival is just too manic in my opinion. The show relies too much on special effects simply because they are available, and not enough on storyline. I think there needs to be contrast within the show, because then the scary elements are that much more effective. Watching the Pertwee era the other day, revealed the show had very little in common with its revival. The stories had greater depth, and the characters just seemed so much more real. I liked Dr Who when he seemed slightly mysterious, and perhaps a touch older. The juvenile Dr, pulling faces, and acting the clown, is something i have difficulty relating to. The new series does seem explicitely geared to children.”
Depth?! Now, I've only watched a handful of classic Who episodes, but of the ones I have seen, there was basically no emotional depth...except possibly when Adric died.
Regardless of whether I've got my facts right, NewWho definitely does have depth. Most of the characters have been developed: Rory, Amy's long suffering boyfriend, now husband always being jealous of the Doctor, Amy being irreversibly changed as an 7 year old by the Doctor's appearance, her having to choose, and The Doctor coming to terms with the fact that he is seen as a mighty warrior and that there is an army against him. These developments are just a few or many.
Oh and I don't know why people go on about Doctor Who being scary and hiding behind the sofa. I have never been scared or frightened by an episode of Doctor Who in my life. The closest I came to being scared was in Blink.