Oh please. Can we not go down the horrendously misguided sandal trodden path of the idiotic old 'if you find the idea of two men having sex to be unpleasant you are a nasty bigot' routine.
Utter nonsense.
Utter nonsense.
If Matt Smith and David Tennant Had A Baby...
2 of 3
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Oh please. Can we not go down the horrendously misguided sandal trodden path of the idiotic old 'if you find the idea of two men having sex you are a nasty bigot' routine.
Utter nonsense.”
“Oh please. Can we not go down the horrendously misguided sandal trodden path of the idiotic old 'if you find the idea of two men having sex you are a nasty bigot' routine.
Utter nonsense.”
point well made, for that I thank you.
Originally Posted by MrPowered:
“If Matt Smith and David Tennant Had A Baby...”
“If Matt Smith and David Tennant Had A Baby...”
........ it still wouldn't be anywhere near as good a Dr Who as Christopher Eccleston.
Originally Posted by MrPowered:
“Can we get off of this subject? The whole purpose of the topic is what would happen if two Doctor's had a baby...”
“Can we get off of this subject? The whole purpose of the topic is what would happen if two Doctor's had a baby...”
Really? Aside from the fact that it would still be physically impossible, the thread title refers to two actors, not two Doctors...
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Oh please. Can we not go down the horrendously misguided sandal trodden path of the idiotic old 'if you find the idea of two men having sex to be unpleasant you are a nasty bigot' routine.
Utter nonsense.”
“Oh please. Can we not go down the horrendously misguided sandal trodden path of the idiotic old 'if you find the idea of two men having sex to be unpleasant you are a nasty bigot' routine.
Utter nonsense.”
If this is aimed at me, well done for your selective reading of posts. I took offence to the original post, when the poster elaborated what they meant, I dropped it.
As I said, full gay sex doesn't appeal to me either, and I'm gay myself. So, read all the posts before getting high and mighty.
Nothing selective about it. The inference of your post was clear. Now you have clarified then obviously this is not what you meant.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Nothing selective about it. The inference of your post was clear. Now you have clarified then obviously this is not what you meant.”
“Nothing selective about it. The inference of your post was clear. Now you have clarified then obviously this is not what you meant.”
They already had clarified it.
You seem very quick to jump into threads and attack other posters.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Nothing selective about it. The inference of your post was clear. Now you have clarified then obviously this is not what you meant.”
“Nothing selective about it. The inference of your post was clear. Now you have clarified then obviously this is not what you meant.”
I clarified before you responded, that's my point. From the looks of it, you only read my first post.
On the subject of clarification, this whole petty debate may have been avoided if the poster in question was a bit more explicit in the first place. They didn't say "ew, is this an implication that they had gay sex?", but "is this am implication that they're gay?". To me, it looked like a stab at being gay in general. But they explained what they meant, I admitted my misunderstanding, and it was over.
I don't see what your post added.
EDIT: Thank you WelshNige, it's nice to see somebody gets the full picture before jumping in
Originally Posted by WelshNige:
“They already had clarified it.
You seem very quick to jump into threads and attack other posters.”
“They already had clarified it.
You seem very quick to jump into threads and attack other posters.”
That's a bit rich. Can you stick to following Ting around the forum having a go at him and not switch your attentions to me? Thankyou.
Also for your info I did not just jump into this thread. I'd been posting in it for its admittedly short duration. The edit to the relevant posts and the follow up clarifications were all made while I was responding to the intial point so I was not aware of them when I made my reasonable riposte.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“That's a bit rich. Can you stick to following Ting around the forum having a go at him and not switch your attentions to me? Thankyou.
Also for your info I did not just jump into this thread. I'd been posting in it for its admittedly short duration. The edit to the relevant posts and the follow up clarifications were all made while I was responding to the intial point so I was not aware of them when I made my reasonable riposte.”
“That's a bit rich. Can you stick to following Ting around the forum having a go at him and not switch your attentions to me? Thankyou.
Also for your info I did not just jump into this thread. I'd been posting in it for its admittedly short duration. The edit to the relevant posts and the follow up clarifications were all made while I was responding to the intial point so I was not aware of them when I made my reasonable riposte.”
If you feel that "reasonable riposte" includes phrases such as 'horrendously misguided', 'idiotic' and 'utter nonsense', then we obviously have very different ideas of what that means.
As for following Ting around the forum, he posts in nearly every thread out there so inevitably I respond to a small percentage of his posts, particularly when he displays his hypocrisy and double standards.
Originally Posted by WelshNige:
“If you feel that "reasonable riposte" includes phrases such as 'horrendously misguided', 'idiotic' and 'utter nonsense', then we obviously have very different ideas of what that means.”
“If you feel that "reasonable riposte" includes phrases such as 'horrendously misguided', 'idiotic' and 'utter nonsense', then we obviously have very different ideas of what that means.”
I used those words to describe a particular debate which I felt it was implied the thread was about to deteriorate into based on the fact two forum members in quick succesion questioned rednecks obviously innocent and reasonable remark.
Originally Posted by WelshNige:
“If you feel that "reasonable riposte" includes phrases such as 'horrendously misguided', 'idiotic' and 'utter nonsense', then we obviously have very different ideas of what that means.
As for following Ting around the forum, he posts in nearly every thread out there so inevitably I respond to a small percentage of his posts, particularly when he displays his hypocrisy and double standards.”
“If you feel that "reasonable riposte" includes phrases such as 'horrendously misguided', 'idiotic' and 'utter nonsense', then we obviously have very different ideas of what that means.
As for following Ting around the forum, he posts in nearly every thread out there so inevitably I respond to a small percentage of his posts, particularly when he displays his hypocrisy and double standards.”
A quick count of your recent posts on your profile shows that roughly 14 out of 25 are either directly responding to or making refernces to Tingram. That's not a small percentage.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“A quick count of your recent posts on your profile shows that roughly 14 out of 25 are either directly responding to or making refernces to Tingram. That's not a small percentage.”
“A quick count of your recent posts on your profile shows that roughly 14 out of 25 are either directly responding to or making refernces to Tingram. That's not a small percentage.”
I said a small percentage of his posts, not mine.
Please try and read other posters posts properly before responding.
And considering you are accusing me of following you and Ting around the forum, looking at my post history is a little bit hypocritical.
Originally Posted by WelshNige:
“I said a small percentage of his posts, not mine.
Please try and read other posters posts properly before responding.
And considering you are accusing me of following you and Ting around the forum, looking at my post history is a little bit hypocritical.”
“I said a small percentage of his posts, not mine.
Please try and read other posters posts properly before responding.
And considering you are accusing me of following you and Ting around the forum, looking at my post history is a little bit hypocritical.”
Not at all. I did it only to confirm my suspicions. The only times I thought i'd seen you posting was always in reference to Ting. So as not to be accused of jumping to conclusions I checked your recent posts. It.confirmed I was correct.
I'll say no more on this matter
Edit- just one more thing. I did read your posts so don't be so rude. You respond to nearly everything Ting posts. That is not a small percentage. Wherever Ting is posting a critique of RTD you are sure to be following him around to have a go at him.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Not at all. I did it only to confirm my suspicions. The only times I thought i'd seen you posting was always in reference to Ting. So as not to be accused of jumping to conclusions I checked your recent posts. It.confirmed I was correct.
I'll say no more on this matter
Edit- just one more thing. I did read your posts so don't be so rude. You respond to nearly everything Ting posts. That is not a small percentage. Wherever Ting is posting a critique of RTD you are sure to be following him around to have a go at him.”
“Not at all. I did it only to confirm my suspicions. The only times I thought i'd seen you posting was always in reference to Ting. So as not to be accused of jumping to conclusions I checked your recent posts. It.confirmed I was correct.
I'll say no more on this matter
Edit- just one more thing. I did read your posts so don't be so rude. You respond to nearly everything Ting posts. That is not a small percentage. Wherever Ting is posting a critique of RTD you are sure to be following him around to have a go at him.”
Since 10/7 Ting has posted 155 times on this forum.
I have responded to him 6 times in that period.
Please get your facts right before throwing false accusations at other posters.
I'm out of this thead now, and apologies to the rest of the forum for taking it off topic.
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“No. First of all, they're both male so it would be physically impossible.”
“No. First of all, they're both male so it would be physically impossible.”
I'm sure it would be, but most females wouldn't mind seeing them give it a try.
Check out this photo, and understand that this is actual hardcore porn to some women.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“A quick count of your recent posts on your profile shows that roughly 14 out of 25 are either directly responding to or making refernces to Tingram. That's not a small percentage.”
“A quick count of your recent posts on your profile shows that roughly 14 out of 25 are either directly responding to or making refernces to Tingram. That's not a small percentage.”
Wow, who gives a toss?
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Edit- just one more thing. I did read your posts so don't be so rude. You respond to nearly everything Ting posts. That is not a small percentage. Wherever Ting is posting a critique of RTD you are sure to be following him around to have a go at him.”
“Edit- just one more thing. I did read your posts so don't be so rude. You respond to nearly everything Ting posts. That is not a small percentage. Wherever Ting is posting a critique of RTD you are sure to be following him around to have a go at him.”
Again, who gives a toss? It's an internet forum, so you getting high and mighty about essentially nothing at all is the equivalent of pissing in the wind.
Obviously you gave enough of a toss to post twice on a debate/argument that didn't involve you. Take your own advice.
Originally Posted by BobbyMalone:
“Obviously you gave enough of a toss to post twice on a debate/argument that didn't involve you. Take your own advice.”
“Obviously you gave enough of a toss to post twice on a debate/argument that didn't involve you. Take your own advice.”
No, you were being an arse to someone over the internet you don't actually know, and I called you on it.
Take .my. advice and try and think about who might actually be on the other end of those snide remarks before you start typing.
Originally Posted by steven87gill:
“No, you were being an arse to someone over the internet you don't actually know, and I called you on it.
Take .my. advice and try and think about who might actually be on the other end of those snide remarks before you start typing.”
“No, you were being an arse to someone over the internet you don't actually know, and I called you on it.
Take .my. advice and try and think about who might actually be on the other end of those snide remarks before you start typing.”
I think I... I... I love you!
2 of 3
