• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment Services
  • Satellite
  • Freesat
Astra 1N - Any News ?
<<
<
111 of 116
>>
>
derek500
16-02-2012
Originally Posted by Paddy C:
“Oh yeah, I forgot that Film 4 HD starts BARB reporting at the end of the month.”

BARB reporting means nothing.

Quote:
“26 April, 2011 12:03
BARB reported channels
UPDATED: E4 HD will now become BARB-reported from Tuesday, May 3, 2011. (Was to begin BARB reporting on 28th February, 2011)”

Nothing changed. E4 HD still only Sky/Virgin.
pad_ehh
17-02-2012
Film 4 HD is still Virgin only. Why bother BARB reporting it when they know the viewing figures are going to be minute? It doesn't make sense.

I still believe that E4 HD, More 4 HD and Film 4 HD are coming to Freesat over the next 12-18 months. Don't ruin this for me!
soulboy77
17-02-2012
BARB reporting is used to set the advertising rate card.
IanP
17-02-2012
There must be a minimum level of distribution before there are enough BARB panel members with the channel to provide useful data.
M60
17-02-2012
Originally Posted by IanP:
“There must be a minimum level of distribution before there are enough BARB panel members with the channel to provide useful data.”

Film4HD is on a different LCN on Virgin too, it's not swapped with the SD version as on Sky's platform for HD customers so I reckon existing viewing figures are even lower.
pad_ehh
17-02-2012
BARB reporting would be pointless for them really, they'll probably get back that there are so few watching it's recorded a '0' figure. They'll only need BARB reporting when the launch on satellite or on digital terrestrial if they ever buy a slot.
peter05
18-02-2012
delete
peter05
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by Neda_Turk:
“Strange, you would have thought that E4, MOre4, and Film4 would be moved to 11127V where Channel 4HD is sitting all alone on a whole transponder.

Maybe they don't want to mix SD and HD on the same transponder and are keeping 11127V for HD only (Film4HD, E4HD, More4HD) - All wishful thinking of course.”

Wellcome back Neda- Turk may be we should all be emailing channel 4 to let them know we want Film4HD, E4HD, More4HD FTA and on freesat
Neda_Turk
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by peter05:
“Wellcome back Neda- Turk may be we should all be emailing channel 4 to let them know we want Film4HD, E4HD, More4HD FTA and on freesat”

Yes you would have thought that Channel 4 had learnt its lesson after they first loaded up E4 in a sky contract only to really watch it out of contract for Big Brother viewers some time ago. But it seems they have leant nothing with there jumping straight back in with sky for the E4HD contract.

Hopefully they don't make the same mistake 3 times in a row.

At least they can't use the copyright/no narrow beams cop out that they and other channels have abused to cover up their money grabbing choices of the past.
derek500
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by Neda_Turk:
“Yes you would have thought that Channel 4 had learnt its lesson after they first loaded up E4 in a sky contract only to really watch it out of contract for Big Brother viewers some time ago. But it seems they have leant nothing with there jumping straight back in with sky for the E4HD contract. ”

It is slightly different. Making E4 HD FTA won't give them a larger reach (which making E4 FTA did), but will lose them subscription income.

Don't forget they have signed with Virgin too, it's not all Sky!!

This month the main C4 is under performing in viewers compared to the ad rates it's charged. So every penny helps.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012...ns-advertisers
peter05
19-02-2012
May be we should email channel 4 and let them know just how many people want it FTA
popeye13
19-02-2012
Derek500.. Are you real!!!!! Saying making E4HD FTA won't give it a big reach....
Single most the biggest load of tosh ive ever heard..
There is millions of viewers that use Freesat/FTA DSAT boxes for their telly viewing, so yes, taking it away from the grubby hands of BskyB's subscription packages, (Your HD subscription) will give it a huge reach and you know it, so talk sense if you are to be on here, not a whine about you losing a HD cannel from your pay package!
derek500
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by popeye13:
“Derek500.. Are you real!!!!! Saying making E4HD FTA won't give it a big reach....
Single most the biggest load of tosh ive ever heard..
There is millions of viewers that use Freesat/FTA DSAT boxes for their telly viewing, so yes, taking it away from the grubby hands of BskyB's subscription packages, (Your HD subscription) will give it a huge reach and you know it, so talk sense if you are to be on here, not a whine about you losing a HD cannel from your pay package!”

I'm saying that making E4 HD FTA won't give E4's programmes a higher reach.

The same number of people will be able to watch E4 programmes whether or not E4 HD is FTA.

This is a different situation to when E4 became FTA. Its reach more than doubled.

BTW E4 HD is pay on Virgin too!!

Are more people watching ITV2/3/4 programmes now that HD versions are available on Sky?
davemurgatroyd
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by popeye13:
“Derek500.. Are you real!!!!! Saying making E4HD FTA won't give it a big reach....
Single most the biggest load of tosh ive ever heard..
There is millions of viewers that use Freesat/FTA DSAT boxes for their telly viewing, so yes, taking it away from the grubby hands of BskyB's subscription packages, (Your HD subscription) will give it a huge reach and you know it, so talk sense if you are to be on here, not a whine about you losing a HD cannel from your pay package!”

Most of the viewers E4HD would gain would be present SD viewers rather the few viewing it only because it is an HD channel. So possibly a small net gain over the two and would that gain equal or beat the income they are receing from subscriptions. Channel 4 themselves (from the above linked report) seem to think that they may have a shortfall in viewing figures for the advertising they have sold so need every penny they can get from other revenue..
popeye13
19-02-2012
We're not talking about ITV2,3&4 HD here, its E4HD..

The more know that a programme is available to watch in HD, on a channel they are able to view, then that will be beneficial to a broadcaster.
There is next to zero channels you can watch on VM without a subscription, so E4HD on VM is again, a pointless example you give to deflect away from this being digital satellite!!
Neda_Turk
19-02-2012
Late at night if there are two programmes on different channel that I vaguely want to watch, I will always go for the one that I can watch in HD, so yes, having something in HD is a draw.

Suppose that I didn't have E4HD and there was a programme on a HD channel I did get and something on E4SD - E4 would lose out as I would go for the HD programme most of the time.

And of course the more that is FTA means the more of Sky TV I can dump as strangely most people on the planet prefer not having to pay for stuff. (Hard to believe I know! )

I resent sky and their dirty tactics to fleece money out of people. So anything that reduces or stops that can only be a good thing for the majority of right thinking people.
Ray Cathode
19-02-2012
The vacant HD slot on Freeview could deliver millions more viewers for Film4HD or E4HD when combined with a FreeSat launch. It all depends on when the exclusive HD pay TV contracts end.
derek500
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by popeye13:
“
The more know that a programme is available to watch in HD, on a channel they are able to view, then that will be beneficial to a broadcaster.”

Not if they just switch from the SD version to HD. Currently E4 gets extra income from Sky/Virgin if the HD version is watched.

Quote:
“There is next to zero channels you can watch on VM without a subscription, so E4HD on VM is again, a pointless example you give to deflect away from this being digital satellite!!”

E4 HD is in the most expensive XL pack, unlike the dozens of channels which are available in cheaper bundles.
derek500
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by Ray Cathode:
“The vacant HD slot on Freeview could deliver millions more viewers for Film4HD or E4HD when combined with a FreeSat launch.”

At the expense of the SD versions. Millions more won't watch because something is in HD.

Still the same number watching the ads.
Hotbird
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by derek500:
“E4 HD is in the most expensive XL pack, unlike the dozens of channels which are available in cheaper bundles.”

The Horror Channel is in the XL package on Virgin but that is still FTA on satellite so not sure what the package E4HD is in on Virgin has any baring on what the service could do on the satellite platform.

I hope E4HD becomes FTA soon, although personally I would much rather Film4HD arriving on FTA satellite.
peter05
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by derek500:
“At the expense of the SD versions. Millions more won't watch because something is in HD.

Still the same number watching the ads.”

With milions more buying HD TV's and not wanting sky, I think they would watch E4HD FTA and not watch E4SD
derek500
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by peter05:
“With milions more buying HD TV's and not wanting sky, I think they would watch E4HD FTA and not watch E4SD”

...and millions of those TV's don't have an HD source.

My neighbour recently bought a new TV and the box was out for recycling. It had Full HD on the box, but on closer inspection it was standard Freeview and not Freeview HD.

No dish and no cable, so they won't be watching any HD. Bet they think they are though!!
Phil Owens
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by derek500:
“...and millions of those TV's don't have an HD source.

My neighbour recently bought a new TV and the box was out for recycling. It had Full HD on the box, but on closer inspection it was standard Freeview and not Freeview HD.

No dish and no cable, so they won't be watching any HD. Bet they think they are though!!”

Ask them if they are watching HD or think they are. Maybe they have a Freeview HD box, may by they have bluray dvd...

Who knows?
I never inspect my neighbours rubbish...
peter05
19-02-2012
Originally Posted by derek500:
“...and millions of those TV's don't have an HD source.

My neighbour recently bought a new TV and the box was out for recycling. It had Full HD on the box, but on closer inspection it was standard Freeview and not Freeview HD.

No dish and no cable, so they won't be watching any HD. Bet they think they are though!!”

Yes but I expect he has sky hd and does not realize he is not getting it, hope you told him
popeye13
19-02-2012
Jesus derek, give it a rest will ya!!!!

Face facts that more and more HD channels will move to FTA services as the money is more though advertising than what Sky can give in subscriptions. The more watch it, the more it makes in ad revenue.
As for looking though your neighbours rubbish, perhaps see a therapist about that.
<<
<
111 of 116
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map