So Marvel have had the rights to Marvelman for two years and all they've produced is a set of reprints of the 50s/60s issues. With all due respect to creator Mick Anglo, a bunch of old Captain Marvel-style kids' comics are only likely to have a limited nostalgia appeal.
What fans really want is a reprint of the Alan Moore run and a reprint/continuation of the Neil Gaiman run, yet this material seems to be stuck in Legal Hell. Back in March, Big Ben creator Dez Skinn still hadn't been approached about the prospective use of BB in any reprints.
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...1&postcount=11
Honestly, who benefits from this ridiculous legal stand-off between McFarlane, Gaiman, Skinn, Anglo, Tom, Dick and Harry? Surely it's time to decide once and for all who owns what?
What fans really want is a reprint of the Alan Moore run and a reprint/continuation of the Neil Gaiman run, yet this material seems to be stuck in Legal Hell. Back in March, Big Ben creator Dez Skinn still hadn't been approached about the prospective use of BB in any reprints.
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...1&postcount=11
Honestly, who benefits from this ridiculous legal stand-off between McFarlane, Gaiman, Skinn, Anglo, Tom, Dick and Harry? Surely it's time to decide once and for all who owns what?

