Originally Posted by unique:
“i think it's more to do with side buttons actually. until the case is heard we won't know, but as they got a preliminary injunction it's likely apple will win. you only get those if the judge thinks you will win your case. if apple lose it will cost them a lot of money to samsung, so they must be sure they will win the case too”
“i think it's more to do with side buttons actually. until the case is heard we won't know, but as they got a preliminary injunction it's likely apple will win. you only get those if the judge thinks you will win your case. if apple lose it will cost them a lot of money to samsung, so they must be sure they will win the case too”
I think you're making it up as you go along now.

The only physical buttons on the Motorola Xoom (the one I have) are the on/off/standby button on the back, and the volume + - buttons on the left side.
The only physical similarity I can see is the way the bezel and screen are integrated in the one glass front, but you are begining to see that on some TVs now as well.
I presume if Apple win this case, the competitors will be limited to producing circular or triangular tablets?

As I said before. The whole thing is just plain stupid on Apple's part. I've got no problem with them genuinely trying to protect a patent, but this does not seem to be that at all. They are just trying to hamstring their competitors to try to get a monopoly in the market.
I have an Apple laptop that I'm very fond of, but I would have to think long and hard before I ever bought another Apple product, because of their disgraceful conduct here.





I think your source may be taking bs
