• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Music
Do you think ABBA are better than The Beatles?
<<
<
4 of 13
>>
>
Rita's Kabin
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by J6ngo1977:
“Bloody hell you are big Abba fan. YES you can quantify music by the 'soul' that goes into it. All I am saying is that Abba are not bad but they are not in the same ball park as The Beatles.”

Matter of opinion.

All judgements on matters of music are subjective and the most anyone can say is "I prefer 'A' to 'B'".

Come on how do you measure how much "soul" goes into something?

Tell me the formula you use to decide how much 'soul' there is in "Love Me Do" compared to "Waterloo".

If what you said was true we'd be able to assign a numerical value to what we were judging and the one with the higher score would win.

So, once more, please enlighten us how to calculate how much "soul" there is in a song.

If you're not able to do that just admit that you prefer The Beatles to Abba and the rest of your arguments have no factual basis.
Theshane
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by woutch:
“This is almost laughable.

I have been watching this thread and can totally sympathise with the posts from "GPK" who has mentioned four iconic ABBA albums but has refused to rise to the school-boy backyard challenge that you're making him take, almost saying "come and have a go if you think you're hard enough."

GPK mentioned 4 iconic ABBA albums but then couldn't name them. As I said earlier and I will repeat now, If someone makes a claim is it too much to ask them to back it up?


Earlier you highlighted an album that you classed as "iconic" even though it sold only about "ten copies". Okay, I know you were being ironic there, but you defined "iconic" by the quality of the recordings included. That's more of a cult than an icon if it failed to reach an audience. But if that forms the basis of your argument, then just about all ABBAs albums could be classed as "iconic" as it's really hard to top ABBAs song quality output.

Something doesn't have to have a massive audience to be iconic. Celine Dions Titanic song for example sold millions but its not an iconic song. Theres quality and longevity that result in being Iconic. Loves Album my not have sold many albums at the time but it is regards as an iconic '60's album. Just because ABBA's albums sold big doesn't make them iconic.

But I digress.

Having lived through the ABBA period while they were active, I can quite honestly say that the imagery and symbolism alone was "iconic" and that's before you even touch on the songs.

You claim that ABBA were a mere "singles band". Well, today, with two "greatest hits" albums out there (Gold and More Gold) it must mean that their eight studio albums were filled with some pretty great tunes to enable the filling up of these two Greatest Hits CDs, and even then some singles are missing from the collections. All of these songs must have come from somewhere and in many cases, they came from iconic studio albums that sold in their millions.


They have two greatest hits albums. Two greatest hits albums with singles on them. Not album tracks, cause then it would be a best of, singles. That means they had enough singles to fill two cd's and says nothing about their album tracks.

ABBA came together quite by accident and their first two albums weren't even properly credited to them as "ABBA" as a name. They just wrote their own material and, as recording artists in Sweden, came together to record these two LPs that almost could be classed as novelty recordings today, even if they do include the odd gem.

It's only when they realised that they were onto something genius that their third, and arguably first coherent album was just Christened "ABBA". But even that album, despite having such pop masterpieces as SOS and Mamma Mia (along with five or six other memorable tunes) could not really be classed as "iconic".

No, that came in 1976 when the iconism and the appeal of ABBA exploded. That was reflected in the name of their fourth, and completely "iconic" studio album "ARRIVAL".

There was nowhere you could go around the world where the impact of the imagery of ABBA in a helicopter wasn't seen everywhere. The tracks such as Knowing Me Knowing You, Money Money Money, Fernando and Dancing Queen were to become legendary - and the iconic imagery of the album was so great that they didn't even have name it after a single.


The songs you mention here are all singles. ABBA in a helicopter isn't an iconic image. Stacked boots and silver jump suits are more the iconic image of ABBA. A helicopter is hardly the lips and tongue logo, the single diamond glove, white rhinestone jumpsuit, heck I'd even say Adam Ants white strip across his nose is more recognisable.


It absolutely was the confirmed "arrival" of ABBA - and in a helicopter, and they used a snazzy logo with the first B reversed which made such an impact that they've used it ever since.

ARRIVAL was iconic on so many levels, and gave ABBA their first ever No. 1 album in Britain, a feat that would be repeated another seven times over the next seven years.

People in the music business, whether they previously sneered at ABBAs imagery and roots, couldn't deny the masterful tracks that were included on this album that dominated the world's charts for the next two years.

At the time people would even ask what position Tiger, My Love My Life or When I Kissed The Teacher got to in the singles charts because they were so intrinsically linked with the album's flow. But those tracks never even were singles.

In fact, when you think back to ABBA and hear songs such as Honey Honey, When All Is Said And Done, Happy New Year, On And On And On and even Thank You For The Music you might be forgiven for thinking that you'd gone mad because nowhere can you find a record of those songs in the singles chart in Britain. That's because they weren't even released as singles while ABBA were active. They were just famous "album" tracks.


Thank you for the music was a single in 1983. The rest were singles around the world hence their inclusion on their Greatest hits albums.
Honey honey was not released by ABBA in the uk as a single but a cover went top 10 in 1974.


The iconic imagery of ARRIVAL is so huge that the worldwide touring ABBA museum (which lived in London's Earl's Court for much of last winter) has a replica Arrival "helicopter" that everyone clambers over to get photographed in so that they too can mimic that "iconic" album cover.

Again the helicopter is not iconic of ABBA. You say helicopter, people think Airwolf. Say zebra crossing people will likely say Abbey Road.

ABBA albums were evolutionary. They never recorded the same album twice from 1975 onward. They were all self-penned and self produced. Unlike the whole Beatles output. But Andersson/Ulvaeus wanted to be like Lennon and McCartney. They wanted to write songs and to record albums.


Just looking through the inlay for ABBA Gold and More ABBA Gold yes they were self produced but some songs are co-credited to Stig Anderson. So they didn't quite do it all by themselves.
Also Nobody ever records the same album twice anyway


Sometimes they'd be bold and brave and do things such as "mini musicals" within their albums, like on 1977's "ABBA The Album", or become dark and moody toward the end of their career like on 1981's "The Visitors", but they never recorded the same album twice after Waterloo.

I have mentioned ARRIVAL. I'd boldy state that there were probably three iconic ABBA albums, not four, beginning with the forementioned ARRIVAL from 1976.


Is their mini musical out put that well regarded or even that well known compared to say the second side of Abbey Road or the Who's mini musicals?

Next I'd also say VOULEZ VOUS from 1979 was iconic. The album totally had a style and look that shrieked "we've made it". It followed a musical style that was big in 1979 and yet this album seem to push those boundaries and make it sound totally fresh. Today the album has spawned seven singles -unheard of for ABBA. At the time, you couldn't go anywhere without seeing this album image and hearing the songs: Chiquitita, Summer Night City, Does Your Mother Know, Angeleyes, Voulez Vous, I Have A Dream and (later) Gimme Gimme Gimme. It's like a greatest hits album without even being one!

its like a greatest hits album because all the songs you mentioned were singles and all feature on their greatest hits album. The album cover is also a blue pyramid. I had to look that up.


Then I'd say Super Trouper from 1980 is iconic. It was such an adult step forward for them in terms of content, production and album fluidity. They realised that their writing and style had evolved so much that there's only a couple of songs with the normal bouncy multi-harmony ABBA style that would once be heard in abundance.

Now, the lyrics were as profound as the melodies and as such it was considered unnatural if sang by two female voices. It was an obvious indicator that Benny and Bjorn were moving into darker and more substantial work which they later did with their final ABBA album The Visitors and their musicals CHESS and Kristina - the latter is regarded as a complete "masterpiece".

And, of course, the Super Trouper album cover image of them standing in amongst a crowd with the giant "super trouper" spotlight singling them out remains another great iconic covershot.

Super Trouper was ABBAs most successful studio album. Ever. And it only includes two officially endorsed singles from the group, one of which being the absolute genius that is The Winner Takes It All. So, if ABBA were just a "singles act", why did this album, and all the others that contained so many non-single tracks, sell so well?


So you're asking if a band has a successful group for 5 years and have albums and singles why did people buy the latest album? Also there were 3 UK singles. Supertrooper, The Winner Takes It All and Lay All Your Love On Me.
Again out with the singles the album tracks are not well known. Only Happy New Year, which was a single in Europe and has been on many Christmas compilations is probably well known
.

ABBA had hit albums that sold by the bucketload. Sure, it was a long time ago, and nowadays most know 20% of ABBAs output from "ABBA Gold" but if you suggest that that's all that people "know" them for then I'd like to see who bought all those original albums and continue to buy them year after year, because they're always available and constantly being re-packaged and re-issued.

The re-issues must be to cope with the continuing insatiable demand the public seem to have in purchasing the original iconic studio albums from this, er, singles band.


Not taking anything away here but every act that was sucessful has had albums repackaged from ABBA to Slade to Led zep and the Bay City Rollers. Record companies repackage back catalogues to make money. There isn't an insatiable demand for it but we get it. Also not one single ABBA reissue generated anywhere near the interest that either the Beatles remasters or the Beatles Anthology got.

I have written this as someone who's life was influenced by the music of ABBA, quite by accident, in 1977 when I just couldn't escape from the iconic songs and imagery that was around the world surrounding the ARRIVAL album.

I was aware of what was going in in Britain, but sort of ignored it because it didn't seem cool. But when I was in Nigeria and saw the same thing going on there, I sat up and paid attention.

I listened and looked. Properly. I got rid of the preconceptions and discovered what marvels these songs and albums actually were.

So, to answer the thread. Yes, I think that ABBA have indeed had more influence over me than The Beatles. But The Beatles influenced ABBA so everything goes in circles.

But to state that ABBA were just a "singles band" and didn't have any "iconic albums" is just so untrue, completely unfounded and totally unresearched.

ABBAs songs and albums are both iconic and legendary. Certainly evolutionary. And very influential.

Sure, they had some howlers. But then so did The Beatles
!

You haven't proven or showed an iconic album. You've talked about songs which were singles. But past the singles there isn't a While My Guitar Gently Weeps or a Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds.
People are happy enough to have ABBA Gold and More ABBA Gold because past that there is nothing essential.
The majority of people will not be able to name an ABBA album other than Gold however they will list song after song which were all singles and so ABBA, as good as they were, are a singles band

”

Can i just say although I disagree with a lot of what you wrote kudos on the effort. Gold star
gpk
13-08-2011
what a surprise! people ask for examples only to run them down! just goes to show i was right not to waste my time with childish bullies.
Theshane
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by gpk:
“what a surprise! people ask for examples only to run them down! just goes to show i was right not to waste my time with childish bullies.”

Oh I'm sorry must we accept everything? Oh their in a helicopter it must be iconic. i accept it no questions asked!!!

Also I've explained myself where I disagree and at no point been a childish bully. Though if you care to point out the bullying part I'd be very interested.

At least that person had the balls to name some ABBA albums which you were not able to do.
gpk
13-08-2011
i`m pretty sure woutch mention 3 albums which i agreed with. i spoke at length about another iconic album.
woutch
13-08-2011
Well, you obviously haven't read my post at all @ theshane

You still say that ABBA were a singles band and only people "know" ABBA Gold as an album. But I highlighted dozens of enormously famous ABBA songs that weren't singles but just appeared on studio albums.

This included Thank You For The Music, for goodness sake. This song was enormously famous long, long before the release of ABBA Gold.

You also chose to ignore things that I said like "singles while they were active" or songs chosen by ABBA themselves to release as singles (which Lay All your Love On Me wasn't).

To say they are a singles band only, just because an album contains songs that are strong enough to BE singles (like with Voulez Vous) dismisses their catalogue. It's as if you're saying singles are disposable. I'd say the stronger the songs, the more iconic the album.

But there was also Happy New Year, When All Is Said And Done, Eagle, On and On And On, Honey Honey and countless other famous ABBA songs all buried within the studio albums that became famous without being singles.

I can't (off the top of my head) think of ANY more famous non-single track than Thank You For The Music. It was released as a single AFTER ABBA split, but was hugely known long before this.

ABBAs albums were iconic. Their songs substantial. Their sales incredible.

ABBA have reported album sales of upwards of 370million. ABBA Gold has sold 27million. That's quite a hefty number of people who own a different album than ABBA "Gold".

The winner takes it all!
Theshane
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by gpk:
“i`m pretty sure woutch mention 3 albums which i agreed with. i spoke at length about another iconic album.”

No you mentioned 4 albums then avoided naming them
gpk
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Theshane:
“No you mentioned 4 albums then avoided naming them”

somebody came along and mentioned 3 of the 4 i was going to mention! so i am not alone in my thinking!
Rita's Kabin
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Theshane:
“Oh I'm sorry must we accept everything? Oh their in a helicopter it must be iconic. i accept it no questions asked!!!

Also I've explained myself where I disagree and at no point been a childish bully. Though if you care to point out the bullying part I'd be very interested.

At least that person had the balls to name some ABBA albums which you were not able to do.”


The "iconic" album argument is a load of rubbish anyway.

Who decides what is or isn't an iconic album?

And what makes the opinion of these people any more valid than those of anyone else?

The furthest anyone else can go with regard to music is to say "I prefer "A" over "B".

Anyone who bangs on about "soul", "iconic albums", "better lyrics", "better melodies" etc. is simply trying to add weight to their own opinion.

I'm still waiting for someone to tell me some sort of formula whereby we can score albums and singles and thereby can see which is "better" based on the score that they've got.

Unless that formula is specifed then everything else remain subjective and the sole opinion of each poster.

So, for example would anyone like to tell me the formula for deciding what order to rank the following in:-

+ Penny Lane
+ Eleanor Rigby
+ Let It Be
+ Yesterday
+ Something
+ Hey Jude
+ I Feel Fine
+ Strawberry Fields Forever
+ Hello Goodbye
+ We Can Work It Out
+ Get Back
+ Ticket To Ride
+ She Loves You
MikeyDLuffy
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Theshane:
“No you mentioned 4 albums then avoided naming them”

I always thought a strongly given opinion should be backed up by evidence...
gpk
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by MikeyDLuffy:
“I always thought a strongly given opinion should be backed up by evidence...”

i agree. however, have you heard of the expression `falling on deaf ears`? besides, woutch worded a lot of the evidence. better than i could.
Theshane
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by woutch:
“Well, you obviously haven't read my post at all @ theshane

You still say that ABBA were a singles band and only people "know" ABBA Gold as an album. But I highlighted dozens of enormously famous ABBA songs that weren't singles but just appeared on studio albums.

This included Thank You For The Music, for goodness sake. This song was enormously famous long, long before the release of ABBA Gold.

You also chose to ignore things that I said like "singles while they were active" or songs chosen by ABBA themselves to release as singles (which Lay All your Love On Me wasn't).

To say they are a singles band only, just because an album contains songs that are strong enough to BE singles (like with Voulez Vous) dismisses their catalogue. It's as if you're saying singles are disposable. I'd say the stronger the songs, the more iconic the album.

But there was also Happy New Year, When All Is Said And Done, Eagle, On and On And On, Honey Honey and countless other famous ABBA songs all buried within the studio albums that became famous without being singles.

I can't (off the top of my head) think of ANY more famous non-single track than Thank You For The Music. It was released as a single AFTER ABBA split, but was hugely known long before this.

ABBAs albums were iconic. Their songs substantial. Their sales incredible.

ABBA have reported album sales of upwards of 370million. ABBA Gold has sold 27million. That's quite a hefty number of people who own a different album than ABBA "Gold".

The winner takes it all!”

it doesn't matter when it was released it was still released as a single. Lay all your love on me was released as a single.

thank you for the music was released as a single.
infact every song you listed was released as a single either in the UK or Europe or in most cases both.

ABBA's albums are not iconic because they don't have either a great stand out album like say a Nevermind or a run of great albums like the Beatles or the stones or Jackson for example. ABBA are know for the songs that were hit singles. Hence singles band.

How many people on the streets know Andante, Andante or the Piper?
Not many cause they weren't singles.
gpk
13-08-2011
abba made ironic albums. fact.
Rita's Kabin
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Theshane:
“
ABBA's albums are not iconic because they don't have either a great stand out album like say a Nevermind or a run of great albums like the Beatles or the stones or Jackson for example. ABBA are know for the songs that were hit singles. Hence singles band.”

Still haven't explained what makes an "iconic" album.

If you and I take a multiple choice test the result is there in black and white to see who has done "better" or possibly whether we have scored the same.

So what test is there for an "iconic" album?

Why not just admit that there isn't one and that "iconic" is just a label hung onto certain albums by sections of the music press and fandom, usually in an attempt to claim that the album is "better" than those not deemed to be in the "iconic" club.


Quote:
“How many people on the streets know Andante, Andante or the Piper?
Not many cause they weren't singles.”

How do you know? Have you surveyed them?
I suggest you try watching "Pointless" (BBC1 weekdays) and you'll be surprised at the things they people they have surveyed do and don't know.
You might think that huge number of people can rattle off titles of Beatles singles and albums compared to those of Abba but until you've actually gone out and surveyed people to find out for sure your comment is pure speculation rather than something backed up with any statistical basis.
Ash's Man
13-08-2011
They're very different but the impact the Beatles had has not been matched by a band to this day and probably never will. Also, Abba's music doesn't really say anything other than the chorus that was catchy. The Beatles did have artistic integrity to an extent so I don't think they can be compared.
woutch
13-08-2011
I still don't get your point TheShane.

You asked about iconic ABBA albums and, having lived through it, I have demonstrated what I believed to be three iconic ABBA albums.

You then said about them being a Single-band, and not only did I highlight some famous non-album singles (that became famous BEFORE they were released as singles in whichever territory you chose to pluck from obscurity), I also mentioned each album's huge sales which must mean that a great many people will have heard even Andante Andante and The Piper which you kindly highlighted (both great songs, by the way)

I just think you don't like to have facts and statistics shown to you. To be honest, I would not consider much of the earlier list of albums you mentioned as iconic, but that just proves a matter of taste - not because they probably aren't. Altough what really defines "iconic" anyway? It's surely different to different people.

I can't think of very many non-Beatles songs, for example, but that doesn't mean their albums aren't iconic, but it's fairly obvious that their singles would be more famous, as with ABBA, or any other group really.

But to say that ARRIVAL, VOULEZ VOUS or SUPER TROUPER were not iconic albums, then I am not sure how much bigger an act has to become, or how famous their songs and albums need to be, to be considered iconic in your eyes.

And Stig Anderson (ABBAs manager) contributed song titles and a few English phrases to some of the earlier songs. He was never involved in the composition of any of the melodies, and ABBA never did any covers. Unlike Beatles.
gpk
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Ash's Man:
“They're very different but the impact the Beatles had has not been matched by a band to this day and probably never will. Also, Abba's music doesn't really say anything other than the chorus that was catchy. The Beatles did have artistic integrity to an extent so I don't think they can be compared.”

i wouldn't and didn't compare. what exactly do you mean by artistic integrity? i don't need a dictionary definition. i just want you to quantify what you mean?
woutch
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Ash's Man:
“They're very different but the impact the Beatles had has not been matched by a band to this day and probably never will. Also, Abba's music doesn't really say anything other than the chorus that was catchy. The Beatles did have artistic integrity to an extent so I don't think they can be compared.”

That's so not true about ABBAs melodies. The verses, intros and bridges are filled with killer-hooks. They were geniuses at that. I agree that their lyrics didn't always match up to their wonderful tunes and production values (same with Beatles there) , but my God Agnetha and Frida were better singers than John and Paul!
Theshane
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Rita's Kabin:
“Still haven't explained what makes an "iconic" album.

If you and I take a multiple choice test the result is there in black and white to see who has done "better" or possibly whether we have scored the same.

So what test is there for an "iconic" album?

Why not just admit that there isn't one and that "iconic" is just a label hung onto certain albums by sections of the music press and fandom, usually in an attempt to claim that the album is "better" than those not deemed to be in the "iconic" club.




How do you know? Have you surveyed them?
I suggest you try watching "Pointless" (BBC1 weekdays) and you'll be surprised at the things they people they have surveyed do and don't know.
You might think that huge number of people can rattle off titles of Beatles singles and albums compared to those of Abba but until you've actually gone out and surveyed people to find out for sure your comment is pure speculation rather than something backed up with any statistical basis.”

An iconic album would be a great album that will stand for all time. About 2 or 3 pages back I listed about twenty by a handful of acts.
ABBA don't have a BAD or a Pet Sounds a great album that is synonymous with them as a band.
And your other point.
Beatles album tracks and ABBA album tracks.
Norwegian Wood
Michelle
Taxman
Here There & Everywhere
She's leaving Home
A Day In The Life
Back in The USSR
While My Guitar Gently Weeps
Here Comes The Sun
Octopus's Garden

Thats a list of Beatles album tracks, I've not even mentioned B-Sides, of the top of my head and some of them, are far more well known and more regularly played than half the songs on More ABBA Gold.
Outwith the stuff on ABBA gold their stuff just isn't known en masse.

Heck Phoebe got married to Here There & Everywhere can't see that happening with a non single ABBA track
Theshane
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by woutch:
“I still don't get your point TheShane.

You asked about iconic ABBA albums and, having lived through it, I have demonstrated three iconic albums.

You then said about them being a Single-band, and not only did I highlight some famous non-album singles (that became famous BEFORE they were released as singles in whichever territory you chose to pluck from obscurity), I also mentioned each album's huge sales which must mean that a great many people will have heard even Andante Andante and The Piper which you kindly highlighted (both great songs, by the way)

I just think you don't like to have facts and statistics shown to you. To be honest, I would not consider much of the earlier list of albums you mentioned as iconic, but that just proves a matter of taste - not because they probably aren't.

I can't think of very many non-Beatles songs, for example, but that doesn't mean their albums aren't iconic, but it's fairly obvious that their singles would be more famous, as with ABBA, or any other group really.

But to say that ARRIVAL, VOULEZ VOUS or SUPER TROUPER were not iconic albums, then I am not sure how much bigger an act has to become, or how famous their songs and albums need to be, to be considered iconic in your eyes.

And Stig Anderson (ABBAs manager) contributed song titles and a few English phrases to some of the earlier songs. He was never involved in the composition of any of the melodies, and ABBA never did any covers. Unlike Beatles.”

Sales are not a mark of being iconic. James Blunt had a mega selling album. Iconic? No.
ABBA don't have great albums. Albums that will last for years and be be passed down generations as being great (iconic) albums.
They do on the other hand have several singles that are rightly recognised and know for being brilliant.
You didn't list a single song that wasn't released as a single though. Everyone you listed was either a UK or European single. I did not pluck any territory from obscurity as you put it. UK or Europe thats where every song you listed was released. Europe is not that obscure even in the 70's it was still quite large.
J6ngo1977
13-08-2011
I am sorry but it Is a stupid bloody argument. Abba? yeh a good pop band. The Beatles? a band who have molded modern day music. It is just a ridiculous comparison. Call me as many pricks as you want but the Op is just grinding gears.
gpk
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Theshane:
“Sales are not a mark of being iconic. James Blunt had a mega selling album. Iconic? No.
ABBA don't have great albums. Albums that will last for years and be be passed down generations as being great (iconic) albums.
They do on the other hand have several singles that are rightly recognised and know for being brilliant.
You didn't list a single song that wasn't released as a single though. Everyone you listed was either a UK or European single. I did not pluck any territory from obscurity as you put it. UK or Europe thats where every song you listed was released. Europe is not that obscure even in the 70's it was still quite large.”

so the long and short of it is. that you believed that abba had no iconic albums 4 hours ago. now you still believe that! i was correct not to waste my time! my opinions haven't changed either.
Rita's Kabin
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by Theshane:
“An iconic album would be a great album that will stand for all time. About 2 or 3 pages back I listed about twenty by a handful of acts.”

The point you're failing to grasp is that there is no concrete test for music. There's no "formula" for deciding whether a song or an album is 'better' than something else.

The worth of a song or album is all down to the person who listens to it and your opinion is no more valid than mine or anyone else's.

Over time, of course, some albums and songs have gained this label of being "great" or iconic" just because a vocal section of people have decided that they are.



Quote:
“Michelle”

Single. Number one for The Overlanders


Quote:
“She's leaving Home”

Single. Reached number 1 for Billy Bragg.


Quote:
“Back in The USSR”

Single. Charted for The Beatles in 1976


Quote:
“Here Comes The Sun”

Single. Reached Number 10 in 1976 for Steve Harley


Quote:
“Thats a list of Beatles album tracks, I've not even mentioned B-Sides, of the top of my head and some of them, are far more well known and more regularly played than half the songs on More ABBA Gold.
Outwith the stuff on ABBA gold their stuff just isn't known.
Heck Phoebe got married to Here There & Everywhere can't see that happening with a non single ABBA track
Outwith”

More supposition. Until you've carried out a survey as to how well known Beatles tracks and Abba tracks are amongst the general public everything you've said above is pure speculation.
woutch
13-08-2011
"ABBA don't have great albums. Albums that will last for years and be be passed down generations as being great (iconic) albums"


Erm, how many "generations" are we talking about for a "great" album to still be passed down and played for you to consider it iconic?

And please stop saying that "because a song was released in Europe" it is classed as a single. The world was very different in the 70s and 80s. Nobody knew that a song was a single elsewhere in the world and it certainly wouldn't have contributed to air time on our radio, but it didn't stop the non-single ABBA songs becoming famous in the UK. And why? because millions bought those iconic albums that shaped the 70s and 80s and knew and loved the content.

Who plays those angry songs from the Punk era anymore? Not many! But how many people are listening to Slipping Through My Fingers from the "great" ABBA album The Visitors at this moment? Probably quite a few around the world.

PS I have only heard of two of those non-single Beatles songs you highlighted, but I am sure they're all good songs!
harveybest
13-08-2011
Originally Posted by J6ngo1977:
“I am sorry but it Is a stupid bloody argument. Abba? yeh a good pop band. The Beatles? a band who have molded modern day music. It is just a ridiculous comparison. Call me as many pricks as you want but the Op is just grinding gears.”


Yep call me one as well but I fuuly agree.
<<
<
4 of 13
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map