|
||||||||
Kirkwood's worst decision |
| View Poll Results: Kirkwood's worst decision | |||
| Peggy's exit storyline |
|
26 | 11.61% |
| Kat and Alfie running The Vic |
|
52 | 23.21% |
| Billie's death (good episode, but worth it?) |
|
8 | 3.57% |
| Stacey/Ryan affair |
|
33 | 14.73% |
| Climax of Who Killed Archie/Stacey getting away with murder |
|
26 | 11.61% |
| Baby swap |
|
60 | 26.79% |
| Max/Tanya affair |
|
32 | 14.29% |
| Introducing Tyler and Anthony Moon |
|
76 | 33.93% |
| Axing characters with potential like Julie and Vanessa |
|
70 | 31.25% |
| Axing the Beale twins, thereby ruining EE's original family |
|
68 | 30.36% |
| Rushing Santer's storylines to completion (Lucas, Archie, etc.) |
|
47 | 20.98% |
| Overuse of comedy characters |
|
19 | 8.48% |
| Too much filler and not enough good storylines |
|
64 | 28.57% |
| Changing characters to fit a particular storyline |
|
68 | 30.36% |
| Making majority of the characters unlikable |
|
53 | 23.66% |
| Ruining the look of the show |
|
22 | 9.82% |
| Trying to appeal to the Hollyoaks/Only Way Is Essex |
|
55 | 24.55% |
| Other |
|
12 | 5.36% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 224. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Monologue Central
Posts: 4,712
|
Kirkwood's worst decision
He's made a lot, let's be honest.
- Peggy's exit storyline - Kat and Alfie running The Vic - Billie's death (good episode, but worth it?) - Stacey/Ryan affair - Climax of Who Killed Archie/Stacey getting away with murder - Baby swap - Max/Tanya affair - Introducing Tyler and Anthony Moon - Axing characters with potential like Julie and Vanessa - Axing the Beale twins, thereby ruining EE's original family - Rushing Santer's storylines to completion (Lucas, Archie, etc.) - Overuse of comedy characters - Too much filler and not enough good storylines - Changing characters to fit a particular storyline - Making majority of the characters unlikable - Ruining the look of the show by making it too bright and making all the sets look too colourful, cheap and tacky - Trying to appeal to the Hollyoaks/Only Way Is Essex crowd with characters like Jodie, Poppy and Tyler - Other |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 3,133
|
Edit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,015
|
Quote:
He's made a lot, let's be honest.
- Peggy's exit storyline - Kat and Alfie running The Vic - Billie's death (good episode, but worth it?) - Stacey/Ryan affair - Climax of Who Killed Archie/Stacey getting away with murder - Baby swap - Max/Tanya affair - Introducing Tyler and Anthony Moon - Axing characters with potential like Julie and Vanessa - Axing the Beale twins, thereby ruining EE's original family - Rushing Santer's storylines to completion (Lucas, Archie, etc.) - Overuse of comedy characters - Too much filler and not enough good storylines - Changing characters to fit a particular storyline - Making majority of the characters unlikable - Ruining the look of the show by making it too bright and making all the sets look too colourful, cheap and tacky - Trying to appeal to the Hollyoaks/Only Way Is Essex crowd with characters like Jodie, Poppy and Tyler - Other |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Monologue Central
Posts: 4,712
|
Quote:
Its the writers too. BK is responsible for the show but you can't blame him for everything.
He's the EXECUTIVE producer for a reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,371
|
Decisions are there to be made its what he gets paid for, not everybody is going to get the best out of things, most storylines have been done and redone a million times on soaps, do I like all of them no but you rather watch the show or you don't it doesn't matter if BK leaves or not he only be replace by someone else whose ideas viewers will probably take against the show is a revolving door you never know what or whose is going to walk through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
[quote=EastEndFan05;52039259]He's made a lot, let's be honest.
No, I don't think he has, the only mistake he has made, imo, is axeing Zoe Lucker. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: England
Posts: 827
|
I went for introducing Tyler and Anthony. Tyler in particular I really do despise! I think axing Vanessa has a been a big mistake too though.
I don't mind Kirkwood though, I've been enjoying the show
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 418
|
Most of the things listed I've actually enjoyed
some i'm indifferent to e.g the moon boys, they've only been on screen a few weeks.The only thing I think is a shame is the waste of characters with potential, Vanessa being a prime example. More could have been made of her ex Harry too to fill the gangster element of the show which has been there for many years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 3,133
|
A few possibilities but I went with the recent introduction of the chuckle brothers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,551
|
Kat and Alfie running the Vic for me. I miss the Mitchells running the place; it was much better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 122
|
I think Kirkwood gets a lot of unnecessary hate on this forum from what I have seen. I'm not going to claim that he is a good producer, because I believe a lot of his tenure has been consistently average to terrible, but I do not feel he is the complete disaster that a lot of people want him to be or think he is.
It seems unfair to pin Eastenders decline all on him. I feel the show hasn't been consistently good since around Feb 2010, in which we were still watching Santers story lines. I would even go further to say that I don't feel the show has been truly consistently excellent since around 2004. It's the retraction from the gritty, kitchen sink drama of the 80's, 90's and early 2000's in favour of sensationalist tripe ( Who Killed Archie, Baby Swap etc..) which has been detrimental to Eastenders, and this can not all be blamed on Kirkwood. His key problem is perhaps being a victim of his own success. Coming from a hugely successful stint as the Hollyoaks producer, I feel a lot of people expected great things from him. Sadly he was unable to deliver anything ( bar perhaps Billies death) that really matched that expectation. He has made a lot of mistakes as a producer and as an EE fan I would gladly acknowledge this, but some of the criticism aimed at him are unfounded and unfair. In response to the actual question ( ), I feel the Moon brothers and the Stacey/Ryan affair are the most awful things to have come out of this reign. Very disappointed in Zoe Lukers axing aswell as the Max/Tanya affair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 903
|
I think the main blunder for me has been Max and Tanya's affair. Fair enough, the reveal made for a good episode not only has it rendered Tanya utterly unlikable for me (with cancer seemingly pulled out of the bag to scrounge for sympathy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,015
|
Quote:
I think Kirkwood gets a lot of unnecessary hate on this forum from what I have seen. I'm not going to claim that he is a good producer, because I believe a lot of his tenure has been consistently average to terrible, but I do not feel he is the complete disaster that a lot of people want him to be or think he is.
It seems unfair to pin Eastenders decline all on him. I feel the show hasn't been consistently good since around Feb 2010, in which we were still watching Santers story lines. I would even go further to say that I don't feel the show has been truly consistently excellent since around 2004. It's the retraction from the gritty, kitchen sink drama of the 80's, 90's and early 2000's in favour of sensationalist tripe ( Who Killed Archie, Baby Swap etc..) which has been detrimental to Eastenders, and this can not all be blamed on Kirkwood. His key problem is perhaps being a victim of his own success. Coming from a hugely successful stint as the Hollyoaks producer, I feel a lot of people expected great things from him. Sadly he was unable to deliver anything ( bar perhaps Billies death) that really matched that expectation. He has made a lot of mistakes as a producer and as an EE fan I would gladly acknowledge this, but some of the criticism aimed at him are unfounded and unfair. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Always Leeds in my heart
Posts: 794
|
I voted for the following
- Kat and Alfie running The Vic - Baby swap - Introducing Tyler and Anthony Moon - Too much filler and not enough good storylines - Changing characters to fit a particular storyline - Trying to appeal to the Hollyoaks/Only Way Is Essex crowd with characters like Jodie, Poppy and Tyler I could have added more but then I would begin to question why I still watch it. Thankfully Friday reminded me why I still think EE is the best soap. A rare jewel of an episode |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Monologue Central
Posts: 4,712
|
It's all very well standing up for Kirkwood. He has done a few good things like bringing character interaction back and the odd good character/episode. But on the whole he's been terrible. Yes, he picked up where previous producers left off (a declining in quality EE from the mid 2000's onwards), but he's made it even worse.
It's not as if people are running around mindlessly ''hating'' on him. People are giving specific, valid reasons for why they think the show is suffering under him. Just look at the poll options. You can't get any more specific than that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 190
|
I voted for:
Stacey/Ryan affair - It ended awfully and it didn't feel real. The only good thing about the storyline was Janine. Baby swap - The lack of focus on the mental health element of the storyline. Ronnie went to jail, but she has obvious mental health problems. Also the fact they were forced to cut the storyline short. They should've stood their ground. Too much filler and not enough good storylines - A lot of storylines feel or have felt a bit half-arsed. They start it and then leave it for a month and apparently we are meant to piece things together and use our imagination for the rest of it. e.g. Michael and Roxy - They flirted for about 3 episodes and suddenly they moved in with each other & loved each other. Trying to appeal to the Hollyoaks/Only Way Is Essex - People do not watch Eastenders to laugh or cringe from the stupidity of certain characters. I understand that many were moaning about the morbid mood of Eastenders with deaths and affairs but I don't get how they thought Jodie and Poppy was great. I saw a lot of people annoyed at the characters in the 1st episode they were in ('Tommy's' funeral). Other - The fact they have given Kat another baby death storyline. Way too soon! Edit: I would say the episodes that have been good is more down to specific writers, such as Carey Andrews and Simon Ashdown. People referring to Billie's death, I think the leading up to the death was bloody rubbish - when he broke up with whitney and apparently fell in love with someone else. It was quite unbelievable. It was like they didn't bother since he was being axed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,336
|
Quote:
He's made a lot, let's be honest.
- Peggy's exit storyline - Kat and Alfie running The Vic - Billie's death (good episode, but worth it?) - Stacey/Ryan affair - Climax of Who Killed Archie/Stacey getting away with murder - Baby swap - Max/Tanya affair - Introducing Tyler and Anthony Moon - Axing characters with potential like Julie and Vanessa - Axing the Beale twins, thereby ruining EE's original family - Rushing Santer's storylines to completion (Lucas, Archie, etc.) - Overuse of comedy characters - Too much filler and not enough good storylines - Changing characters to fit a particular storyline - Making majority of the characters unlikable - Ruining the look of the show by making it too bright and making all the sets look too colourful, cheap and tacky - Trying to appeal to the Hollyoaks/Only Way Is Essex crowd with characters like Jodie, Poppy and Tyler - Other Definatley. I admit, the Lucas storyline went on for a long time, but it was good. I would of liked it if he had killed Liz. Also, they could of told us that Archie raped Stacey as soon as it happened, then we could of seen a more evil side to Archie and a much more vunerable side to Stacey. They could of also introduced Roxy as a suspect in Archie's muerder if we found out that he raped Ronnie before he dide. He could of even raped someone else... |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,456
|
The main problem for me at the moment is mindless filler and somewhat iffy writing. There are some decent episodes, but I think a really engaging, ongoing plot is missing. Tanya and Max didn't fit the bill, because we knew roughly how that would end from the start...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,397
|
There's not been enough death imo. I'm sick of people leaving in taxis when they should be going in bodybags. Lucas's storyline coming to a climax and the Queen Vic fire happening without a single death was really disappointing. And its not like there wasn't a wealth of characters leaving at the time, that could've been killed off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: essex
Posts: 1,764
|
[quote=xTonix;52039487] Quote:
He's made a lot, let's be honest.
No, I don't think he has, the only mistake he has made, imo, is axeing Zoe Lucker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,336
|
Quote:
There's not been enough death imo. I'm sick of people leaving in taxis when they should be going in bodybags. Lucas's storyline coming to a climax and the Queen Vic fire happening without a single death was really disappointing. And its not like there wasn't a wealth of characters leaving at the time, that could've been killed off.
! Also, would've been interesting to see Ryan kill Archie, I know they already showed his dark side, but it wouldnt hurt to show an even darker side, would it?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 587
|
[quote=joeski97;52041426] Quote:
he did not axe vanessa, zoe lucker quit. please get your facts right ![]() It seems you're the wrong one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,061
|
Quote:
Rushing Santer's storylines to completion (Lucas, Archie, etc.)
Definatley. I admit, the Lucas storyline went on for a long time, but it was good. I would of liked it if he had killed Liz. Also, they could of told us that Archie raped Stacey as soon as it happened, then we could of seen a more evil side to Archie and a much more vunerable side to Stacey. They could of also introduced Roxy as a suspect in Archie's muerder if we found out that he raped Ronnie before he dide. He could of even raped someone else... I dont care what that toilet scene implied at that point they had no plans for archie to be a rapist..All that nonsense came after the fact to tie in to the "who killed archie" farce Quote:
There's not been enough death imo. I'm sick of people leaving in taxis when they should be going in bodybags. Lucas's storyline coming to a climax and the Queen Vic fire happening without a single death was really disappointing. And its not like there wasn't a wealth of characters leaving at the time, that could've been killed off.
freaky |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,336
|
Quote:
he never raped her they just left it open ended.Then when they couldn't make peggy archie's killer they re-wrote history to give stacey a motive...
I dont care what that toilet scene implied at that point they had no plans for archie to be a rapist..All that nonsense came after the fact to tie in to the "who killed archie" farceI feel like this is from my archives word for word freaky |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,993
|
I think his problem now is that he doesn't have any big storylines going. The other guy had the Lucas and Archie stories going on at around the same time. Not everyone liked them, but they were very dramatic.
Instead of having kat and alfie faffing around, max and tanya's repetitive boring ass storylines, he should start concentrating on some big storylines. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:19.



!