Originally Posted by Sun!:
“I think the Beebs Saturday night schedule is starting to feel a bit stale and while SCD will give it a boost I think they need a few new shows to boost the schedule.”
I agree they need new shows but more than that they desperately need to ditch their rinse and repeat Saturday schedule. There's really very little variation in terms of content on the BBC1 Saturday night schedule across the week. Honestly I think dropping the lottery draws (and the quiz shows that anchor to it) and dramatically reducing the number of Casualty episodes per year could be the best thing to happen to BBC1's Saturday night schedule. It might force them to be a bit more creative and adventurous.
Originally Posted by SJB 2007:
“Interesting stat that i picked up from the ratings thread over at Gallifrey Base.”
For the record that stat is one of the reasons Doctor Who is so important to BBC1. I think people get very hung up on how many people are watching shows on BBC1 (and the BBC in general) when just as often who those people are can be as important if not more so.
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“I'm going to say this bluntly.
It is only for Doctor Who that timeshift seems to be important or is "bigged up".”
In fairness that's because Doctor Who's timeshift does seem to be uniquely large.
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“If other shows can still maintain huge overnights, (The Body Farm for instance, up against Doc Martin and is a brand new show, gained more overnights on a Monday than Doctor Who did against poor competition on Prime Time Saturday), then Doctor Who, a well established show that is supposedly the Jewel in the BBC's crown should be achieving higher overnights.”
Again I say its not always about how many people are watching but who those people are.
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“I am perfectly happy to concede that timeshift figures make up the overall figure, but my argument remains that if fewer people are watching Doctor Who as it is broadcast, then eventually more people will choose not to bother watching it at all in a few years' time.”
Potentially I agree but I think more information needs to be gathered as to why people are happy to timeshift rather than watch live. There are more potential reasons for timeshifting and iPlayer viewing other than the show not being 'must see'.
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“I'm no fortune teller, but one does wonder what the viewing figures would be like if Tennant was still in the role. He maintained a healthy 6-8 million viewers in virtually all his episodes, and that was overnights. iPlayer was also in existence in 2008 as was PVR and Sky+. The difference was people genuinely wanted to watch the show as it went out. Now they don't. Perhaps it's because they feel they have many options or perhaps they feel it no longer matters whether they watch or not. That is seriously something that needs considering.”
Tennant's last full series was broadcast 3 (or is it 4?) years ago now and over the last 3 (4?) years the television landscape has changed quite a lot. The iPlayer has grown substantially since Tennant left the role as has the use of PVR's - just ask Sky how much the use of Sky+ has grown over the past 3 (4?) years I'm sure they'll be more than happy to tell you.
In general I think Tennant gets far too much credit for the ratings whilst he was The Doctor if only because (as far as I can remember) he's never really been able to transfer this apparently huge popularity into blockbuster ratings for anything other than Doctor Who.