|
||||||||
Liz Jones - YOU magazine (Part 3) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1326 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,017
|
At the other end of the spectrum I once sat next to a lovely old man in his 80s on very long flight from New Zealand. He had the window seat, I was in the middle and my partner had the aisle seat. After about 5 hours I was concerned/impressed that the old man hadn't yet got up to use the er, facilities and so I said to him that he mustn't worry about disturbing us if he needed to get up at any time. He reassured that wasn't a problem as he was wearing a colostomy bag. Now we had another 20 hours to go and the thought of what was pressing against me in zoo class on a turbulent flight wasn't pleasant - my partner thought it was hysterically funny though.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1327 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
Mark this in your diaries, but for once, I agree with the basic premise the old bat is peddling. I once endured a trans-atlantic flight with a very young (under a year) baby screaming - not crying, screaming - the whole way across. As we were de-planing, the rightly embarrassed mother said to us all in general "I'm very sorry, but she really doesn't like flying", whereupon an smartly dressed elderly gentleman responded "then why the f*** did you bring the brat ?". Cue round of applause from all. I've also had older but still young children kicking the back of my seat for hours, and all the parent will say is "they get bored". Families should have their own cabin. Soundproofed.
|
|
|
|
|
#1328 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Offshore. OK, near the Thames.
Posts: 2,256
|
Quote:
.... Should I ever have been on a flight with Ms. Jones I would have told my three to annoy her as much as possible and fed pure sugar to all the other children on the flight before telling them to go say hello to the scary lady.
![]() ![]() LJ probably seized upon that NY Times article with delight! I think the problem for passengers of all ages is being crammed into a confined space & being unable to move for x hours - making any noise seem more shrill/extreme. Imho most parents do their best, but when things turn bad, there's nowhere for anyone to retreat to. My most recent noisy travelling experience was sharing a long train journey (where most seats are reserved & you can't easily bag another) with a group of women who talked VERY LOUDLY and screeched with laughter non-stop for the whole five hours. When we finally arrived, the worst culprit cried: "Oooh, didn't that journey go quickly - but then we were talking, aha ha ha ha!!!" Me (nursing shredded eardrums): Grrrrr ![]() Reading some of the comments >HERE< (relating to the above NYT article), frankly, I'd be too scared of some of these passengers to travel with an infant...
|
|
|
|
|
#1329 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 65,903
|
Quote:
This MM seems to be a new one as the last one two years ago was an innocent local farmer who she appeared to be stalking and it was unrequited.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...-calls-me.html Again it is all fiction just to get her out of the hole she's dug but surely even the most loyal and gullible Lizzy Lover must realised that they've been duped and surely can't condone even a fictional affair - again. The moan about babies on long-haul flights is all right, if already done a million times, but it is horrible to go on to whine about how expensive her presents for her nephews and nieces are and how relatively mean her brothers and sisters are. I don't really think there is an answer to the babies-on-planes problem. Personally I think people are mad for taking little children on long haul flights just for a holiday, but no point in taking it out on the individual. For all the cross neighbour knows, the mother might be flying home for a funeral after a horrible bereavement. When my children were tiny they enjoyed modest little holidays about an hour from home; we used to go camping just West of Oxford on a site with a swimming pool, and for a happy week they slept in a tent, ate outside, swam, walked and set up elaborate snail farms; I swear that no holiday to Florida has ever been appreciated more, and it took an hour to get there. |
|
|
|
|
#1330 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,792
|
I didn't take my two on a plane until they were old enough to play on a Gameboy!! I remember my friend took her two on a night flight to Florida for the millennium- they would have been 5 and 3 - and she told me they took it in turns to scream loudly throughout the entire 9 hours....
|
|
|
|
|
#1331 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Somewhere in Germany
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
This MM seems to be a new one as the last one two years ago was an innocent local farmer who she appeared to be stalking and it was unrequited.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...-calls-me.html Again it is all fiction just to get her out of the hole she's dug but surely even the most loyal and gullible Lizzy Lover must realised that they've been duped and surely can't condone even a fictional affair - again. "6. The MM is a farmer, albeit an organic one. I don’t agree with farming animals, or making any money from them whatsoever. I couldn’t possibly have as a friend someone who raises animals holistically then sends them to slaughter and eats them, which is why I have ruled out Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and Jamie Oliver as future suitors." So what about her new business venture, then? Or does the fact that she says that the money will go towards her animals' "pensions" mean that it's ok to make money from them? |
|
|
|
|
#1332 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
All it takes is a bit of parental responsibility and some of us parents actually do have that. My 3 have never, screamed, kicked someones seat or misbehaved in any other annoying way because I as their parent saw it as my responsibility to keep them entertained and under control. Unfortunately until they come up with a way to stop the feckless procreating we are stuck with this sort of thing.
I sympathise with the kicked seat problem - I've had that happen to me (and my well-behaved girls!) with children whose parents couldn't give a stuff and I agree it's downright annoying. Children on flights are not a problem in themselves, it's the parents who make them a problem. If a child is crying, distract it or feed it. If it's annoying other people then tell it off and make it aware that such behaviour is unacceptable - and then give them an alternative which is more productive/positive. It's not rocket science!! |
|
|
|
|
#1333 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 673
|
OMG
! Jonesy name-checked on BBCR4 Today's newspaper review at just after 06.30 a.m (re the CGI H&M models) - nearly choked on mi' cereal!
|
|
|
|
|
#1334 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 535
|
|
|
|
|
#1335 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1336 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 460
|
Quote:
Thank you, thank you, thank you for sharing that splendidly scary vision. But, Lancashire? Does it mean it's safe to go to the Dulverton tip, which is actually Brushford, without fear of fly-by invisible helicopters, broomsticks or any other apparition that springs to mind?To distract myself from what I should be doing, below is a totally non-scanning verse... Hubble, bubble, toil and trouble, With (vegan) milk and yolks that coddle, Enter my web of great deceit With made up men lying at my feet; They say the devil wears only Prada For which‘ tis known that I pay nada |
|
|
|
|
#1337 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Thank you, thank you, thank you for sharing that splendidly scary vision. But, Lancashire? Does it mean it's safe to go to the Dulverton tip, which is actually Brushford, without fear of fly-by invisible helicopters, broomsticks or any other apparition that springs to mind?
To distract myself from what I should be doing, below is a totally non-scanning verse... Hubble, bubble, toil and trouble, With (vegan) milk and yolks that coddle, Enter my web of great deceit With made up men lying at my feet; They say the devil wears only Prada For which‘ tis known that I pay nada ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks newbaby. |
|
|
|
#1338 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Somewhere in Germany
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
'She added: “The sad thing is that all Elizabeth really wanted was to be loved. But she went about it the wrong way, and was burned at the stake.”'Since burning at the stake is not an option nowadays, are the comments on this forum the modern day equivalent? |
|
|
|
|
#1339 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 535
|
Being slowly asphyxiated in cashmere garments, or drowning in San Pellegrino, or from withdrawal symptoms of Illy coffee deprivation, in sequence like Rasputin.
Or all three combined, I don't mind |
|
|
|
#1340 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 460
|
Quote:
Can this go on FB please? Having the crappiest day here and this made me
![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks newbaby. Yes, of course, do with it what you will! It's hardly high literature to which copyright is appended!!!! (And jolly kind of you to ask...so thank you for that). |
|
|
|
|
#1341 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,655
|
Quote:
OMG
! Jonesy name-checked on BBCR4 Today's newspaper review at just after 06.30 a.m (re the CGI H&M models) - nearly choked on mi' cereal! ![]() How do I join the facebook group? I'm not good facebooking anything, but I want to try. |
|
|
|
|
#1342 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1343 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pembrokeshire,Wales
Posts: 475
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...desert-me.html
She's wondering why she doesn't have any friends just because she writes about them ! There are 4 Liz Jones articles in the MOS today - bit of an overkill! |
|
|
|
|
#1344 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 159
|
The diary article is no longer showing. What did it say?
|
|
|
|
|
#1345 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,655
|
Ah, so I'm not the only one who can't read it now. I'm glad I read it earlier this morning.
It was very odd. She went on about how she has no friends left, and some random glamorous friend tells her its because she writes about them in rude and unpleasant ways. Liz is outraged and baffled by this, and then hurt and self pitying. She refers to her 'husband' in the present tense in one paragraph. Then she 'suddenly realises that her RS boyfriend may read what she wrote last week about the married man who makes her sparkle. (is this leading to the inevitable break up? Is it?). So she wishes that if only she could take it all back. And she includes an extra sentance about how she means her real live boyfriend whom she has sex with and whom she loves, just to make us all queasy over breakfast. Honestly, there was no need for that gratuitous sentance. So anyway, there you have it. RS b/f is likely to read her article online and realise she's aiming to try to have an affair with some random Married Man with young kids. Perhaps the inability to now access it online is make it all look realistic. Or perhaps its due to some caustic comments. I mean, seriously, is the woman so deluded that she a) thinks we believe her stories of imaginary RS b/f. and b) does she not understand that writing nasty things about people makes them upset? So, there we have the inevitable set up for the big break up of the RS romance. She will be distraught and just unable to imagine why he's so upset with her. There will be months of columns and dreary entries all about why she doesn't understand the end of the relationship. And she'll be able to compare her misery and the relationship with the ex husband. |
|
|
|
|
#1346 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Offshore. OK, near the Thames.
Posts: 2,256
|
Quote:
It was very odd. She went on about how she has no friends left, and some random glamorous friend tells her its because she writes about them in rude and unpleasant ways. Liz is outraged and baffled by this, and then hurt and self pitying. She refers to her 'husband' in the present tense in one paragraph....
. ![]() The Dreary's still offline. "Wahh! I have no friends left" - how many times has this appeared now? The Mail should pay LJ (if they really must) a basic repeat fee rather than £1 a word for the regular reworkings of her original cave paintings. We're not missing a stunning revelation today, then..
|
|
|
|
|
#1347 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 159
|
Thanks DT.
|
|
|
|
|
#1348 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,655
|
Quote:
Thanks DT
![]() The Dreary's still offline. "Wahh! I have no friends left" - how many times has this appeared now? The Mail should pay LJ (if they really must) a basic repeat fee rather than £1 a word for the regular reworkings of her original cave paintings. We're not missing a stunning revelation today, then. ![]() It appears to have come as a revealation that people might have read the horrible peices she writes about them - and identified themselves. Although, having said that, I'm sure she's done this before too. I'm intregued as to why it is now no longer available. Perhaps the 4 comments posted (can't see them either) were too harsh to be left unmoderated? Perhaps she is really trying to retract things? Anyway, 4 LJ articles in the one paper is far too much, so perhaps the DM has realised this and kindly removed one as an act of benevolence - though I think the bizarre 'angels woman' article would have been better removed. |
|
|
|
|
#1349 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pembrokeshire,Wales
Posts: 475
|
The Diary seems to be back on line now - and the comments are still there!
|
|
|
|
|
#1350 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Offshore. OK, near the Thames.
Posts: 2,256
|
Back now.
There are a couple of comments suggesting that LJ has Asperger's Syndrome*. She is probably googling in preparation for her next hypochondria special right now. (*fwiw, I'd disagree, as LJ seems to get a kick out of reporting her social gaffes/negative behaviour - indeed, cranks it up for the purposes of creating column fodder. ie, no inadvertence) |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36.







