• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother Appreciation
The John James & Josie Appreciation Thread (Part 204)
<<
<
53 of 124
>>
>
k182
07-09-2011
Josiestweet Josie Gibson
Bloody hell it is true. Pa ha ha this is too funny!
32 seconds ago


She must of searced she is in a mag in USA
muggins14
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by PICKLES60:
“Aww thanks must say my boys are lovely cuddlers Love a nice cuddle”

Yes, Laura's a great cuddler too
bblover
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“I think they are pretty common all over the world, some realise they need to be alone for a while as that's what suits them best, some seem to dive head-long into the next relationship. It probably depends upon what kind of person they are and maybe what the want/need from a relationship, or at least from that next relationship ”

Reading the reaction after the split,i thought as if it wasn't something ppl knew about,moving on that quickly,doesn't mean he cheated,like some were/still insinuating.

Originally Posted by TX_Babs:
“For now the only thing that matters is who wins the Veto.

Not impossible for Rachel, but she has the hardest road....again she needs to win the veto”

Rachel has the best shot to win it,hope she does.

And if she was F2,she needs the votes too,not sure she made good friends with the jury,apart from her maaaaan that is.

Originally Posted by JJJ_finland:
“BIB
Hey, I said that as a joke

I understand that this is an appreciation thread to Josie and John James. And I have no need or interest to start appreciating John James and Sherrie or Josie and new guy, whatever his name is....But I do feel that it's right to reffer to them if I'm talking about their lives, if in fact these new bf's or gf's are part of their new lives.

I think a lot of talk around Sherrie has been because we don't really know if she even is John's girlfriend at all. So we've been analysing John's actions cause to many the news back in May came as a bit of a shock or a suprise cause it was just so soon after JJJ split. So the discussion has been "what is going on" kinda of thing.

FAAAAAAAAAAR from any appreciation of the two as a couple. I will never ever start posting pics about their new partners and say "aaaaw, oooh isn't new gf lovely, isn't new bf a hunk" NO WAY!! Or start making photos or videos about them with their new partners. That's not what this thread is about and I'm not interested on their new partners in that way.

But that doesn't meant that I will let others dictate whether or not I can even mention them if the discussion starts to go that way

It is what it is. If they have new partners all I can wish is that their happy, but naming them don't mean I'm appreciating the new couples.”

Do you think there will be a thread started,the Josie and....appreciation thread,next?
k182
07-09-2011
CoutureGossipUK Christopher Couture
by JosieGibsonClub
Check Out Josie Gibson's Hot New Figure! bit.ly/pceHhx @Josiestweet
32 minutes ago
Miamore
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by kfb:
“I've agreed with the whole double standards argument on occasion. But for me the issue is that every topic should be open for discussion if anyone thinks it important enough to mention. But then they must accept that others - and sometimes the rest of the thread - may disagree with them. Nobody should feel they can't post. But I know a lot of people do feel that at times, for a whole load of reasons: like not wanting to upset the rest of the thread, or not liking everyone disagreeing with them, or feeling they're not being taken any notice of. That's the nature of the thread though.”

No no, I agree with this & I would rather read such criticisms here where it can openly be discussed\debated than read it as a sly comment on twitter. But as you say you to have be prepared and open to differing opinions without feeling attacked. Its a shame the trust the thread once took for granted is no longer as strong.
muggins14
07-09-2011
Right, I have to go to library with Laura now, talk soon... it's been interesting today, thanks for the company/discussion Ali xx
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by k182:
“Josiestweet Josie Gibson
Bloody hell it is true. Pa ha ha this is too funny!
32 seconds ago


She must of searced she is in a mag in USA ”

If anyone figures out which one, let me know....this I would like to see.
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by bblover:
“
Rachel has the best shot to win it,hope she does.

And if she was F2,she needs the votes too,not sure she made good friends with the jury,apart from her maaaaan that is.”

Rachel will probably have Dani's vote and anyone that Dani influences in the jury house. Dani does NOT respect anyone else's game play that much, even her ally Porche; and Dani prides herself for choosing the best game player, not who she likes or who is her friend

Rachel's goodbye messages could be her downfall....she could think she is playing for 2nd so it doesn't matter, but she could win and should be a little more diplomatic.
k182
07-09-2011
JosieGibsonClub Official Fan club
Viewing figures for Josie's first show on @bbbits came top of the bbbits figures for week commencing 22 aug at 0.90 million #welldoneall
1 minute ago
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by PICKLES60:
“Aww thanks must say my boys are lovely cuddlers Love a nice cuddle”

Lucky you.
Lucky boys too
bblover
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by TX_Babs:
“Rachel will probably have Dani's vote and anyone that Dani influences in the jury house. Dani does NOT respect anyone else's game play that much, even her ally Porche; and Dani prides herself for choosing the best game player, not who she likes or who is her friend

Rachel's goodbye messages could be her downfall....she could think she is playing for 2nd so it doesn't matter, but she could win and should be a little more diplomatic.”

But Dani can't stand Rachel,would she really play with her head,rather emotions?Hope so....
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by kfb:
“I've agreed with the whole double standards argument on occasion. But for me the issue is that every topic should be open for discussion if anyone thinks it important enough to mention. But then they must accept that others - and sometimes the rest of the thread - may disagree with them. Nobody should feel they can't post. But I know a lot of people do feel that at times, for a whole load of reasons: like not wanting to upset the rest of the thread, or not liking everyone disagreeing with them, or feeling they're not being taken any notice of. That's the nature of the thread though.”

That is the nature of the thread and there's little to be gained from being upset by it or trying to make it something else. Embrace it!
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by bblover:
“But Dani can't stand Rachel,would she really play with her head,rather emotions?Hope so....”

She thinks she would; she thinks that's why she didn't win her first time around....when she should have won, IMO.
People voted personally and she has always been disdainful of that and declared she would never do that if she was on the jury...we may well see.
k182
07-09-2011
NowMag Now Magazine
OMG! Josie Gibson's bum makes the cover of National Enquirer: Big Brother winner Josie Gibson is shown in red bikini bit.ly/nD6RTK
2 minutes ago

http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebri...al-enquirer/1/
bblover
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by TX_Babs:
“She thinks she would; she thinks that why she didn't win her first time around....when she should have won, IMO.
People voted personally and she has always been disdainful of that and declared she would never do that if she was on the jury...we may well see.”

Would be interesting,though no LF for 28h sucks!
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
I'm headed out to get some lunch and may take a glance at the magazine rack while I'm out.

Have fun everyone.

EDIT: I see that its the National Enquirer ... LOL
Never bought that trash...ever! Won't be starting now.
k182
07-09-2011
Josiestweet Josie Gibson
I bloody love @Emma_Willis if I fancied girls and she didn't have a bun in the oven from a massive hunk I definitely would.
2 minutes ago
TX_Babs
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by bblover:
“Would be interesting,though no LF for 28h sucks!”

It really isn't fair when we pay for 24/7 access.
kfb
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by Miamore:
“No no, I agree with this & I would rather read such criticisms here where it can openly be discussed\debated than read it as a sly comment on twitter. But as you say you to have be prepared and open to differing opinions without feeling attacked. Its a shame the trust the thread once took for granted is no longer as strong.”

Is it an issue of trust? Or is it just that since the split people are over-sensitive - IMO - about two people they don't really - not really - know? They just think they know them because they happen to have spent a couple of months with them on a TV programme.
k182
07-09-2011
Josiestweet Josie Gibson
@
@NowMag for F*uck sake I make my American debut and its of my big batty!!! Pmsl !!
2 minutes ago

Josiestweet Josie Gibson
My big batty has gone global thanks America!!
44 seconds ago
bblover
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by TX_Babs:
“It really isn't fair when we pay for 24/7 access. ”

Agree,does it make a different in the ratings?

Originally Posted by kfb:
“Is it an issue of trust? Or is it just that since the split people are over-sensitive - IMO - about two people they don't really - not really - know? They just think they know them because they happen to have spent a couple of months with them on a TV programme.”

The thread was more tolerant imo,when they were in the house,you had so many discussion going on,pp criticising either John or Jose,and yet it never got as heated as it does now and then.
tynetart
07-09-2011
Occasionally in a class I would task the students with a 'reporter' style essay about events and facts and people we had just discussed.
Some of those students would contrive the answer in an airy fairy ....twisted .....cobbled together piece of badly written bunkum..........for which I gave low marks and suggested that a few facts were needed to recue the integrity of the piece.

However ......over he past year with John and Josie I've seen things written and published and spoken that I believed at best shouldn't be acceptable and at worse are teetering on the illegal .......obviously I was aware that there were some unscrupulous pedlars of bunkum.....it always was so ....but I had not fully taken on board the way stories and articles in print and online and from twitter were mixed together and rehashed and then served up as fresh with a few 'new' bits fabricated and thrown in for spice.
The onset of technology seems to have created a lazy form of reporting .....or maybe that's just a copout and it's always been the case...... I'm not sure ......perhaps someone better placed could answer that.
Whatever the reasons are it has certainly been an eye opener and required a fresh mindset from me ..........I've seen the light lol........and now there's always a cynical search for the 'angle'.
Reading back at a few of those rejected essays from my students .....I think instead of being critical to the writers I should have recognised their talents...... praised them and said they had a very promising future as a magazine reporter.
tynetart
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“Right, I have to go to library with Laura now, talk soon... it's been interesting today, thanks for the company/discussion Ali xx”

here we go again .....I just arrive and you have gone
going back to read all of this interesting discussion that I've missed .......seeya later
bblover
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by tynetart:
“Occasionally in a class I would task the students with a 'reporter' style essay about events and facts and people we had just discussed.
Some of those students would contrive the answer in an airy fairy ....twisted .....cobbled together piece of badly written bunkum..........for which I gave low marks and suggested that a few facts were needed to recue the integrity of the piece.

However ......over he past year with John and Josie I've seen things written and published and spoken that I believed at best shouldn't be acceptable and at worse are teetering on the illegal .......obviously I was aware that there were some unscrupulous pedlars of bunkum.....it always was so ....but I had not fully taken on board the way stories and articles in print and online and from twitter were mixed together and rehashed and then served up as fresh with a few 'new' bits fabricated and thrown in for spice.
The onset of technology seems to have created a lazy form of reporting .....or maybe that's just a copout and it's always been the case...... I'm not sure ......perhaps someone better placed could answer that.
Whatever the reasons are it has certainly been an eye opener and required a fresh mindset from me ..........I've seen the light lol........and now there's always a cynical search for the 'angle'.
Reading back at a few of those rejected essays from my students .....I think instead of being critical to the writers I should have recognised their talents...... praised them and said they had a very promising future as a magazine reporter.”

Very true,before i thought every mag headline was true,or that the interview was real!
dollydaydream81
07-09-2011
Originally Posted by tynetart:
“Occasionally in a class I would task the students with a 'reporter' style essay about events and facts and people we had just discussed.
Some of those students would contrive the answer in an airy fairy ....twisted .....cobbled together piece of badly written bunkum..........for which I gave low marks and suggested that a few facts were needed to recue the integrity of the piece.

However ......over he past year with John and Josie I've seen things written and published and spoken that I believed at best shouldn't be acceptable and at worse are teetering on the illegal .......obviously I was aware that there were some unscrupulous pedlars of bunkum.....it always was so ....but I had not fully taken on board the way stories and articles in print and online and from twitter were mixed together and rehashed and then served up as fresh with a few 'new' bits fabricated and thrown in for spice.
The onset of technology seems to have created a lazy form of reporting .....or maybe that's just a copout and it's always been the case...... I'm not sure ......perhaps someone better placed could answer that.
Whatever the reasons are it has certainly been an eye opener and required a fresh mindset from me ..........I've seen the light lol........and now there's always a cynical search for the 'angle'.
Reading back at a few of those rejected essays from my students .....I think instead of being critical to the writers I should have recognised their talents...... praised them and said they had a very promising future as a magazine reporter.”

Were you a teacher Annette? Oh my gosh I would love it if you were my teacher! Might have actually got a good grade! xx
<<
<
53 of 124
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map