|
||||||||
The "Strippers" and their look |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,148
|
The "Strippers" and their look
Well their singing wasn't too clever. But the remark "that look is SO dated". I thought to myself, errrr, didn't Christina Aguilera get to no.1 with that "stripper" look only last year?
Yeah ok, she's got the looks and voice to pull it off much more effectively, but has that look really dated so quickly?!? I thought scantily clad women always had the ability to sell records (if they're fit enough, that is) .
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Watford. Herts
Posts: 3,248
|
as soon as i saw em i thought... "god! they really have stupied xtina!!!"
but then xtina is xtina... and i doubt she would of got where she was today if she had started out dressing like that??? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
|
Christina also dresses like a stripper....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mesostim
Christina also dresses like a stripper....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 658
|
They were both mooses who can't sing, the one with the fishnets on had fat legs too. Great also that they are not aware of the difference between being perved over in secluded working mens clubs and real talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 621
|
I think what Sharon was tryin to say is that you shouldnt really try and copy someone, even from last year and perhaps she thinks where 'dated' is concerned is the blonde hair, heavy make up look.
I dunno! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13
|
all i can say about the strippers is they were so bad I've heard better drunk karaoke singers and what they were wearing. so un tasteful not like christina!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Well, the clothes were 12-18 months past their wear by date and the hair/make up looked like it hadnt changed since the 80's so, yes, they looked very, very dated.
I thought Sharon was fairly easy on them. They looked more like 10 bob hookers than strippers imo. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pinch Me, I'm Dreaming....
Posts: 4,783
|
they are ugly. simon said it like it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchesterford!
Posts: 7,085
|
With their rosy attitudes pre- and during the audition they deserved what they got. Coming back for more was even sillier as you'll only going to antagonise the judges. When they say "go" you should simply just go.
If they are having moderate "success" in working mens clubs then they should count their lucky stars and get back to it. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 10,829
|
Well Dirrty was a hit 2 years ago believe it or not.
In fashion looks move superquickly, and if you dress in something REALLY high fashion it will look dated more quickly. If someone went into an audition wearing a poncho in 2006, I'm sure it would look ridiiculous. ![]() That aside it does bring up a problem from the auditions, in that it seems a lot of the over 35s didn't seem to know how to dress attractively and sexily without looking ridiculous. We have another pair of sisters next week making the exact smae mistake. I pray to God that whoever gets the over 25s (I'm hoping it's Sharon) will hire an appropriate stylist who knows how to style older people to look classy and sexy. I hope the PI2 stylist is not even allowed in the country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: In Your Dreams
Posts: 26,443
|
And weren't they just too old for that image?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchesterford!
Posts: 7,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyBee
And weren't they just too old for that image?
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Very very ugly....with really bad attitudes. The red-head twins were a lot better looking and more talented.
nuff said really |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewWoman
They looked more like 10 bob hookers than strippers imo.
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyBee
And weren't they just too old for that image?
There was NOTHING right about their look at all. They looked like they were AT LEAST in their mid 30's and they were wearing clothes that a 21 year old wore 2 years ago and had hair and make up that looked like they've worn it the same way for the last 20 years. As soon as they walked on, the term 'mutton' sprang to mind. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: was Hemsptead now Hampstead
Posts: 1,128
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewWoman
Absolutely!
There was NOTHING right about their look at all. They looked like they were AT LEAST in their mid 30's and they were wearing clothes that a 21 year old wore 2 years ago and had hair and make up that looked like they've worn it the same way for the last 20 years. As soon as they walked on, the term 'mutton' sprang to mind. I agree particularly one of them looked older but their ages were given as 22 & 24 and they are now very strict about photo ID because of the people who have lied about their age before. The girl with the black hair and weird boots who was put through without her backing singers also looked about 30 though she was 24 (mind you the same could be said for Claire from Steps). |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,013
|
I think lots of these people go to the auditions to try and get the kind of publicity the cheeky girls got, they have made millions for being crap lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Liverpool & West Midlands
Posts: 523
|
Okay, this thread should be closed.
Discussion of stripping isn't really a decent topic to talk about folks..... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39.

.


