Originally Posted by TheManWhoLaughs:
“I think Zach not using the veto was a good move, unless he wanted to play for second place. His only chance of winning as going to the Final 2 against a Donato. If the Final 3 was Eric/Jameka/him, he'd have been f*cked.
He was a dork all season but I thought he played the end-game really well considering his awful social skills (especially compared to Jerry/Kevin/Enzo/Adam since - third place is home to so many terrible players)”
Kevin was in no way an awful player!

Kevin was the best player of BB11 by some margin! He laid low for the first half of the season, joined a truly hated alliance, but still managed to keep friendly connections with the other side, something that Natalie, Lydia, Chima etc could not do. He did everything right, except for winning the final HoH.
I also have to disagree about Zach and the veto. Whilst your correct in saying he could only beat a Donato, keeping both of them around going into the final four when it all came down to competitions was suicide.
Dick and Dani were ridiculously better than Eric and Jameka in competitions. Putting Dick and Dani in a position where all they needed to do was win a Veto and a HoH was just stupid. He should have got rid of Dani, and then done everything in his power to keep Dick. (Which wouldn't have been that hard considering Jameka was useless in competitions, and Eric would have been ordered to keep Dick anyway!)