|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 25) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2551 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Interesting statistic on the running length of the talent shows last night taken from IPlayer/ITV Player and with adverts removed for the X-Factor.
Strictly - 1hr 59 mins X-Factor - 1hr 56 mins X-Factor had 16 contestants to Strictly's 14. X-Factor had 34mins of adverts in its timeslot last night. The two big hitters have more in common than some realise.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2552 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Have Cowell and Cheryl made up yet. I Think it's more likely that we will come back then her. I Don't think ITV Have any need to panic if you inculde +1 the show hasn't fallen below 10m. I Have a feeling that this series Ratings will grow as we get into the later Live shows.
I Wonder if Countryfile will brake 7m again tonight I think Countrywise will be just under the 7m mark but it'll still do very well, and should benefit from the lead out. |
|
|
|
|
#2553 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
Quote:
Particularly as Brucie doesn't do "Sundays" anyway, so it's not as if they record on Saturdays so he doesn't have to be wheeled out two nights in a row.
I think the Beeb should make more of the Sunday show, like the successful 45 minute show 3 years ago, which was getting 11m a week for a good old fashioned bit of entertainment and variety - and left ITV no option but to copycat the format for TXF - and do it live like ITV do. |
|
|
|
|
#2554 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Let's not forget than BBC were the fools that took Strictly out of the Sunday 8pm slot for 2009, leaving ITV to take over the slot with X Factor in 2009 - had BBC not done that, chances are X Factor would not have turned into a major hit for 2009 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
#2555 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,742
|
Quote:
Let's not forget than BBC were the fools that took Strictly out of the Sunday 8pm slot for 2009, leaving ITV to take over the slot with X Factor in 2009 - had BBC not done that, chances are X Factor would not have turned into a major hit for 2009 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
#2556 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Very mixed bag of results for ITV last night. Ross did well compared to previous weeks but Burp was painfully low for a series premiere. X Factor meanwhile was robust enough, but underwhelming compared to 2009 and 2010, and it remains to be seen how much of that was down to the Strictly clash, which itself recovered well from last week's weather induced low rating, and how much is to do with general diminishing interest.
BBC Two had a great night with its David Croft tribute, but of course it's not uncommon for the channel to rate well on competitive Saturday nights, more than holding its own against the juggernauts on BBC One and ITV1. Channels 4 and 5 just collapsed really with dire shares recorded for both, although at least BB was up week-on-week for I think the fourth or fifth episode in a row now, so it's enjoying a good run with the departure of Mark and the arrival of scary Jem. |
|
|
|
|
#2557 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
Quote:
but the BBC show was ridiculous because it wasnt live. The results were known about all day on the internet before the show aired.
One particular example... http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s100/...-with-89m.html and http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s54/s...survivors.html |
|
|
|
|
#2558 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,539
|
When is Strictly having it's Big Wembly show. i think ratings could be very good for that one
|
|
|
|
|
#2559 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 1,797
|
Quote:
Not really the point though, it was getting ~10m at the time and the ITV1 Sunday line-up was getting thrashed at that time, it was only when X Factor moved to Sunday's that the situation changed somewhat.
One particular example... http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s100/...-with-89m.html and http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s54/s...survivors.html ![]() I've followed the Strictly ratings quite closely and saw how badly it did in 2009 after they moved the results show off Sunday nights. However I did not recall Strictly boosting the 9pm hour as much as that though. |
|
|
|
|
#2560 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,711
|
any guesses for what the results could be for both Strictly and X Factor.
I think 9.5million for Strictly and 11million for 12million for X Factor. |
|
|
|
|
#2561 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,539
|
Quote:
any guesses for what the results could be for both Strictly and X Factor.
I think 9.5million for Strictly and 11million for 12million for X Factor. 11.6m X Factor Peek 13.0m |
|
|
|
|
#2562 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,951
|
Quote:
Those are some seriously strong BBC1 Sunday nights back in 2008. Also Antiques Roadshow over 10m
![]() I've followed the Strictly ratings quite closely and saw how badly it did in 2009 after they moved the results show off Sunday nights. However I did not recall Strictly boosting the 9pm hour as much as that though. |
|
|
|
|
#2563 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,049
|
Quote:
Those are some seriously strong BBC1 Sunday nights back in 2008. Also Antiques Roadshow over 10m
![]() I've followed the Strictly ratings quite closely and saw how badly it did in 2009 after they moved the results show off Sunday nights. However I did not recall Strictly boosting the 9pm hour as much as that though. I see DS ratings reports were as error-strewn in 2008 as they are now - as if AR's 10m audience in November 2008 was "its best ever rating". The show used to get 14-15m viewers a week on Sunday teatimes in the 80s and early 90s... |
|
|
|
#2564 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,406
|
Quote:
I think we need some facts put back in this thread. I'm somewhat bewildered by those that are calling The X Factor's ratings good. If I'm to be quite honest, I think they're alright. Not bad, but nothing to be impressed about. Now, to compare:
2008 - 10.4m (41.0%) *peak: 11.3m (49%) 2009 - 11.3m (43.8%) *peak: 12.9m 2010 - 12.2m (48.5%) *peak: 13.8m 2011 - 10.4m (40.3%) / 10.9m *peak: 12.1m / 12.7m Now, the clash period: 2008 - no clash 2009 - 75 minute clash 2010 - no clash 2011 - 35 minute clash Even if it didn't clash, I think it would have been ~11.4m including +1, without seeing a breakdown it's hard to know who dented what. However, do I think it will rate lower than 2009 and 2010 in the series' averages? Yes. |
|
|
|
|
#2565 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,539
|
Quote:
Thanks for these stats D.M.N. I expected it to be down on last year due to the way this series has gone so far. But overall, that rating is disappointing IMO. I know the run time would have affected things, and a 35min clash won't have helped at all - hopefully we'll get a breakdown tomorrow. As I said last week though, TXF has struggled to get into some form of stride - and that 75min clash in 2009 puts the rating is perspective. With +1 it was just under 11.0m which in its own right is a great rating, its just underwhelming thats all. With another clash next week, ITV might have to re-think the scheduling. They should just run it from 8pm. The 7.30pm slot makes to sense due to the SCD clash and starting 30mins later wouldn't really affect it either. Isn't the clash longer next week? I think if the main show (exc. +1) goes below 10m then a some questions need to be asked. Hopefully tonight it can recover. Probs looking at 12.0m inc. +1.
|
|
|
|
|
#2566 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,742
|
Quote:
On Sunday 16th November 2008, Antiques Roadshow grabbed 10.11 million.
Ended up being a bit of a fraud IIRC. |
|
|
|
|
#2567 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,049
|
Quote:
That was the much publicised "£1m antique" that "just turned up".
Ended up being a bit of a fraud IIRC. Not the BBC's finest hour. I don't think there was anything wrong in featuring said item in that show, but someone in the PR department certainly got carried away spinning it as the show's "first £1m find". They must have visited a number of locations in over 30 years that had an item worth >£1m in situ that they could have examined. |
|
|
|
#2568 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,406
|
Quote:
It won't fall below 10m don't be silly. I Have a feeling that the Clash next week is shorter but i'm not sure. As Score said i expect this Series will grow as the series near the end
|
|
|
|
|
#2569 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
BBC1 versus ITV1, 15-minute breakdown, excluding +1:
Time-BBC-1 (Share %) - ITV-1 (Share %) 18:00 - 6.04 m ( 31.2% ) - 2.68 m ( 13.9% ) 18:15 - 7.85 m ( 36.7% ) - 2.85 m ( 13.3% ) 18:30 - 8.50 m ( 38.1% ) - 3.19 m ( 14.3% ) 18:45 - 9.04 m ( 39.4% ) - 3.38 m ( 14.7% ) 19:00 - 9.39 m ( 39.8% ) - 4.21 m ( 17.8% ) 19:15 - 9.74 m ( 39.9% ) - 4.59 m ( 18.8% ) 19:30 - 9.01 m ( 33.3% ) - 8.29 m ( 30.7% ) 19:45 - 8.95 m ( 33.1% ) - 8.66 m ( 32.0% ) 20:00 - 6.53 m ( 24.4% ) - 10.73 m ( 40.1% ) 20:15 - 5.47 m ( 20.3% ) - 11.52 m ( 42.8% ) 20:30 - 5.51 m ( 20.8% ) - 11.09 m ( 41.9% ) 20:45 - 3.76 m ( 14.6% ) - 11.29 m ( 43.9% ) 21:00 - 3.68 m ( 14.8% ) - 10.82 m ( 43.4% ) 21:15 - 3.92 m ( 15.8% ) - 10.31 m ( 41.7% ) 21:30 - 3.84 m ( 15.4% ) - 10.69 m ( 42.9% ) 21:45 - 3.74 m ( 15.2% ) - 10.95 m ( 44.6% ) 22:00 - 4.20 m ( 19.5% ) - 4.71 m ( 21.8% ) |
|
|
|
|
#2570 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
It won't fall below 10m don't be silly. I Have a feeling that the Clash next week is shorter but i'm not sure. As Score said i expect this Series will grow as the series near the end
|
|
|
|
|
#2571 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
BBC1 versus ITV1, 15-minute breakdown, excluding +1:
Time-BBC-1 (Share %) - ITV-1 (Share %) 18:00 - 6.04 m ( 31.2% ) - 2.68 m ( 13.9% ) 18:15 - 7.85 m ( 36.7% ) - 2.85 m ( 13.3% ) 18:30 - 8.50 m ( 38.1% ) - 3.19 m ( 14.3% ) 18:45 - 9.04 m ( 39.4% ) - 3.38 m ( 14.7% ) 19:00 - 9.39 m ( 39.8% ) - 4.21 m ( 17.8% ) 19:15 - 9.74 m ( 39.9% ) - 4.59 m ( 18.8% ) 19:30 - 9.01 m ( 33.3% ) - 8.29 m ( 30.7% ) 19:45 - 8.95 m ( 33.1% ) - 8.66 m ( 32.0% ) 20:00 - 6.53 m ( 24.4% ) - 10.73 m ( 40.1% ) 20:15 - 5.47 m ( 20.3% ) - 11.52 m ( 42.8% ) 20:30 - 5.51 m ( 20.8% ) - 11.09 m ( 41.9% ) 20:45 - 3.76 m ( 14.6% ) - 11.29 m ( 43.9% ) 21:00 - 3.68 m ( 14.8% ) - 10.82 m ( 43.4% ) 21:15 - 3.92 m ( 15.8% ) - 10.31 m ( 41.7% ) 21:30 - 3.84 m ( 15.4% ) - 10.69 m ( 42.9% ) 21:45 - 3.74 m ( 15.2% ) - 10.95 m ( 44.6% ) 22:00 - 4.20 m ( 19.5% ) - 4.71 m ( 21.8% ) ![]() Does anyone have ITV1+1's breakdown for last night, please?
|
|
|
|
|
#2572 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,539
|
Quote:
I said under 10m excluding +1. It got 10.44m last night so its not beyond the realms of possibility if ITV continue to put it against SCD. And I've just checked and it clashes for mins next weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
#2573 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,539
|
looking at that breakdown it seems like at 9:15 alot of people got board of the show
|
|
|
|
|
#2574 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,951
|
Quote:
It won't fall below 10m don't be silly. I Have a feeling that the Clash next week is shorter but i'm not sure. As Score said i expect this Series will grow as the series near the end
|
|
|
|
|
#2575 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,406
|
Quote:
I Think it Clashes for only 20m Next with doesn't it and with the ammount of time if takes for X Factor to start Viewers would probally have only missed 1 act next Week. I think the Chances of it falling below 10m are maybe about 5%. It should be higher next week if they are clashing for a shorter period of time.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:29.






