I think we need some facts put back in this thread. I'm somewhat bewildered by those that are calling The X Factor's ratings good. If I'm to be quite honest, I think they're alright. Not bad, but nothing to be impressed about. Now, to compare:
2008 - 10.4m (41.0%) *peak: 11.3m (49%)
2009 - 11.3m (43.8%) *peak: 12.9m
2010 - 12.2m (48.5%) *peak: 13.8m
2011 - 10.4m (40.3%) / 10.9m *peak: 12.1m / 12.7m
Now, the clash period:
2008 - no clash
2009 - 75 minute clash
2010 - no clash
2011 - 35 minute clash
Even if it didn't clash, I think it would have been ~11.4m including +1, without seeing a breakdown it's hard to know who dented what.
However, do I think it will rate lower than 2009 and 2010 in the series' averages? Yes.
2008 - 10.4m (41.0%) *peak: 11.3m (49%)
2009 - 11.3m (43.8%) *peak: 12.9m
2010 - 12.2m (48.5%) *peak: 13.8m
2011 - 10.4m (40.3%) / 10.9m *peak: 12.1m / 12.7m
Now, the clash period:
2008 - no clash
2009 - 75 minute clash
2010 - no clash
2011 - 35 minute clash
Even if it didn't clash, I think it would have been ~11.4m including +1, without seeing a breakdown it's hard to know who dented what.
However, do I think it will rate lower than 2009 and 2010 in the series' averages? Yes.




”
2 years ago there was a 75 minute clash and that X factor still rated 1m better than last nights.