Originally Posted by
AlexBB3:
“Interesting.
I wonder - when you keep writing about the same person whether you have to keep informing them about the article in advance - guess you probably do, unless John signed a waiver as part of his earlier OK! contract!”
Ive no idea how it works in practise....however...in this instance the journalist writing/involved in this piece would surely know that there is still an interest in John James....
so it is in there interests to pass the interview on ...in case he wants to comment in some way?
Originally Posted by
muggins14:
“I was wondering about this. Surely every time a newspaper mentions somebody they don't have to tell them... I mean they mention hundreds of people a day; say some guy in a village in China does a brave thing and is mentioned in a small piece in a UK paper... is he contacted about being in print? I don't think so!
If it were the case that people were advised of every mention to be made, there would be no article exposing ... well whatever is being exposed at the time (not boobs and bums
)... I think you get my drift
It just isn't possible.
How is it that some people are surprised to see themselves in the papers if this is the case or didn't know that something was printed until they are confronted by a mass of press... just examples there, but we've all seen that happen.
I just can't see that it can be done; it may be that they are supposed to do so, but it's not really feasible surely? It certainly isn't practiced if it is a 'rule'.”
in the leverson enquiry....people like charlotte church were notified of things ., like her fathers affairs..a couple of days before they were published...but too late to actually prevent the story coming out...
I too was surprised by this, but it was mentioned that it was industry practise to inform someone if there was going to be an article written about them.
The point being made ...was that even if they were told of a forthcoming spread, the celeb rarely had an opportunity to actually put their side of the story...
but it also explains the whole thing of the super injunction.. and how .stories were suppressed by celebs cos they didnt want them to get into the public arena....
unless it was general practise to inform people, how could anyone create a super injunction in the first place?