They seem to be a major complaint this series 
Poor resolutions....
1 of 2
Good thing I enjoy the journey then, eh.
Unfortunately there are those that would speak negatively about an entire series if it's final episode wasn't 200% amazing - and the same applies to episodes.
Unfortunately there are those that would speak negatively about an entire series if it's final episode wasn't 200% amazing - and the same applies to episodes.
Originally Posted by TheMagic8ball:
“They seem to be a major complaint this series”
“They seem to be a major complaint this series
”
Do they? Says who?
Originally Posted by TheMagic8ball:
“A general collective response.”
“A general collective response.”
Funny, I haven't noticed it. Just a few of the usual whingers.
im sure everything will be resolved but im expecting most things to be resolved with a sentence or a montage etc.
like when the doctor met those 3 kids in the alley. Yes it resolved that question but it did it in a superficial way that didnt meet expectations
like when the doctor met those 3 kids in the alley. Yes it resolved that question but it did it in a superficial way that didnt meet expectations
There are no poor resolutions the only way they are poor is if they are poorly written and poorly performed. I can only say really that this one and Night Terrors are the only similar "Love" resolutions (I wouldn't consider the Girl Who Waited in this category). Both the resolutions to the episodes were performed and written greatly.
Originally Posted by pajs1000:
“What a fantastic series this is! Roll on next saturday!
”
“What a fantastic series this is! Roll on next saturday!
”
Pajs 1000 liked it. No nitpicking, no over analyzing...we need more Pajs 1000's!
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Pajs 1000 liked it. No nitpicking, no over analyzing...we need more Pajs 1000's!”
“Pajs 1000 liked it. No nitpicking, no over analyzing...we need more Pajs 1000's!
”
Thanks mate!
Originally Posted by snopaelic:
“Random kids? lol i thought it was supposed to mean sommat ok ta”
“Random kids? lol i thought it was supposed to mean sommat ok ta”
They were simply some of the last people to see the Doctor alive. River was reading their eyewitness accounts in the end scene - presumably based on statements taken from those children once they'd grown up (hence the adult voiceovers for each child)
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Pajs 1000 liked it. No nitpicking, no over analyzing...we need more Pajs 1000's!”
“Pajs 1000 liked it. No nitpicking, no over analyzing...we need more Pajs 1000's!
”
I couldn't agree more. Pajs1000 seems to be the only fan on here who's enjoyed everything Doctor Who has thrown at us since 1963.
We need more fans like him who don't bother nitpicking or over-analysing.
Some fans seem to think that it is their duty to criticise the show as much as possible for some reason though.
Originally Posted by Helbore:
“They were simply some of the last people to see the Doctor alive. River was reading their eyewitness accounts in the end scene - presumably based on statements taken from those children once they'd grown up (hence the adult voiceovers for each child)”
“They were simply some of the last people to see the Doctor alive. River was reading their eyewitness accounts in the end scene - presumably based on statements taken from those children once they'd grown up (hence the adult voiceovers for each child)”
I wonder how that scenario came about?
How did River find those three kids when they became adults to take witness statements from them?
Did she put a card up in the Colchester Post Office window asking if anyone had seen the Doctor in the vicinity in 2011?
What if they moved away from the area or even emigrated?
Maybe River set up a 'Have you seen the Doctor?' website to trace the witnesses.
Originally Posted by Lorelei LaFleur:
“I wonder how that scenario came about?
How did River find those three kids when they became adults to take witness statements from them?
Did she put a card up in the Colchester Post Office window asking if anyone had seen the Doctor in the vicinity in 2011?
What if they moved away from the area or even emigrated?
Maybe River set up a 'Have you seen the Doctor?' website to trace the witnesses.”
“I wonder how that scenario came about?
How did River find those three kids when they became adults to take witness statements from them?
Did she put a card up in the Colchester Post Office window asking if anyone had seen the Doctor in the vicinity in 2011?
What if they moved away from the area or even emigrated?
Maybe River set up a 'Have you seen the Doctor?' website to trace the witnesses.”
We'll proably never know the answer to that, but I actually didn't think it was River who got the witness statements from them. River was reading thme in the 51st century, I believe, whilst studying archaology. I'd assumed she was reading historical documents about the death of the Doctor.
Originally Posted by TheSilentFez:
“I couldn't agree more. Pajs1000 seems to be the only fan on here who's enjoyed everything Doctor Who has thrown at us since 1963.
We need more fans like him who don't bother nitpicking or over-analysing.
Some fans seem to think that it is their duty to criticise the show as much as possible for some reason though.”
“I couldn't agree more. Pajs1000 seems to be the only fan on here who's enjoyed everything Doctor Who has thrown at us since 1963.
We need more fans like him who don't bother nitpicking or over-analysing.
Some fans seem to think that it is their duty to criticise the show as much as possible for some reason though.”
Fezzy, I've been told off before by a poster for over-enthusing about the show.
If there is no analysis of the storylines and the dialogue, it makes this sub-forum redundant.
Originally Posted by Helbore:
“We'll proably never know the answer to that, but I actually didn't think it was River who got the witness statements from them. River was reading thme in the 51st century, I believe, whilst studying archaology. I'd assumed she was reading historical documents about the death of the Doctor.”
“We'll proably never know the answer to that, but I actually didn't think it was River who got the witness statements from them. River was reading thme in the 51st century, I believe, whilst studying archaology. I'd assumed she was reading historical documents about the death of the Doctor.”
I considered that the witness statements may have been taken by someone else, too.
That seems most likely.
Who, I wonder? I'd actually like to know.
I'm not nit-picking before anyone should suggest that I am, it's just that I'm interested in little details like that.
Originally Posted by Lorelei LaFleur:
“Fezzy, I've been told off before by a poster for over-enthusing about the show.
If there is no analysis of the storylines and the dialogue, it makes this sub-forum redundant.”
“Fezzy, I've been told off before by a poster for over-enthusing about the show.
If there is no analysis of the storylines and the dialogue, it makes this sub-forum redundant.”
Indeed. We need more like Pajs1000...but definitely not everyone, otherwise this forum would indeed be boring.
Originally Posted by Helbore:
“We'll proably never know the answer to that, but I actually didn't think it was River who got the witness statements from them. River was reading thme in the 51st century, I believe, whilst studying archaology. I'd assumed she was reading historical documents about the death of the Doctor.”
“We'll proably never know the answer to that, but I actually didn't think it was River who got the witness statements from them. River was reading thme in the 51st century, I believe, whilst studying archaology. I'd assumed she was reading historical documents about the death of the Doctor.”
Never give up - never surrender!
1 of 2
