Originally Posted by Anika Hanson:
“Michael Jackson live in Bucharest. Never seen anything like it. ”
Dangerous Tour live in Bucharest is great until you see footage of the Bad Tour. The final Bad concert was in 1989 and the first Dangerous concert was in 1992 but it's like Michael Jackson aged about ten years between the two tours. He mimes half the Bucharest gig, the dancing is limited and not as electric as it was on the Bad Tour and the whole thing has become a bit like a Disney On Ice production.
The Bad Tour remains, in my opinion, the single greatest tour in the history of popular music. You got all the spectacle of a pop concert but with all the legitimacy of a James Brown concert; tight band, impeccable live vocals, but also phenomenal dancing combined with lasers, magic tricks etc.
Jackson just looks a bit depressed on the Dangerous Tour. He announced after the Bad Tour that he didn't intend to ever tour again and made a comment that the only reason he was embarking on the Dangerous Tour was because of the fundraising possibilities. He donated all of his personal profit from the Dangerous Tour - which spanned two years - to charity.
I'm not saying it's a bad tour; it's not. It still trumps anything most performers could even hope to stage. But comparing it to the Bad Tour, MJ had lost something in the interim; his joy. You watch him on the Bad Tour and he can't contain himself. He grins and laughs through the whole show, dances spontaneously, gets lost in the music. On the Dangerous Tour that joy and spontaneity has dissipated. Everything is precise, down to the last toe tap or finger snap, and even his smiles and 'I love yous' are rehearsed.
As for the HIStory Tour... Well, that's better left undiscussed altogether.
The estate, by the way, is planning to release a Bad Tour DVD next year to mark the 25th anniversary of the album. Or that's what I saw on twitter the other day, at least.