Eileen is going to get pregnant 
sorry but I really don't see this story working out.
sorry but I really don't see this story working out.
Huge Corrie spoiler
1 of 2
Oh my god!!!
I wonder who it will be?!? I think this could work (although PLEASE no more babies!!!).
It would bring Eileen into the limelight, something she very much deserves. However thinking on it I can't see how this will happen with all the baby rumours!
Katy Harris
Karen
and now Eileen!
I think I am going to move to Weatherfield and open a creche!
I wonder who it will be?!? I think this could work (although PLEASE no more babies!!!).
It would bring Eileen into the limelight, something she very much deserves. However thinking on it I can't see how this will happen with all the baby rumours!
Katy Harris
Karen
and now Eileen!
I think I am going to move to Weatherfield and open a creche!
I can't find it. Won't the BBC boards only do EE anyways?!? Never been on another soaps forum apart from this one!
Originally Posted by Jumpy:
“I think I am going to move to Weatherfield and open a creche!”
“I think I am going to move to Weatherfield and open a creche!
”
A shop selling condoms might be a better idea
Originally Posted by Jumpy:
“I can't find it. Won't the BBC boards only do EE anyways?!? Never been on another soaps forum apart from this one!”
“I can't find it. Won't the BBC boards only do EE anyways?!? Never been on another soaps forum apart from this one!”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-perl/h2/h2.cgi?&board=drama
Originally Posted by Jumpy:
“Lol....by who?!?
It does happen though, to old women!!!
Can I ask for a source please.”
“Lol....by who?!?
It does happen though, to old women!!!
Can I ask for a source please.”
Less of the old. She may look a bit worn, but she's only in her early 40s!
Originally Posted by Minnie Caldwell:
“Less of the old. She may look a bit worn, but she's only in her early 40s!”
“Less of the old. She may look a bit worn, but she's only in her early 40s!”
I did say older underneath after realising what I said
I meant other than teenagers getting pregnant
Originally Posted by lauralou:
“blimey i didnt see that one coming...interesting.”
“blimey i didnt see that one coming...interesting.”
Nor did Eileen it seems - oh err matron
Eileen will be a great mum. I can't wait to see way more of her on our screens (if she is pregnant that won't be a problem ). More Eileen and less Tracy.
). More Eileen and less Tracy.
Please no...no way can more screen time for Sue Cleaver be justified by making her fall pregnant.
Once the pregnancy is over (and no-doubt another "Who's the father?" storyline) all we will be left with is a middle-aged single-mother. Eileen's character will become very limited, much more limited than it is already.
I wish the Coronation Street writers would stop using pregnancy as a shock tactic - there are plenty of other things they could do with Eileen, which I would find much more interesting.
Do you know that since 1990 there have been 18 births on Coronation Street and only 6 of those children still appear on the show? To my mind that's utterly ridiculous. Compare this with the 7...yes 7 births between 1960 & 1989 and it may become apparent how dependent Coronation Street has become on births and pregnancies. Of the 7 children born between those dates, 4 have been regular characters within the past 2 years (Tracy, Peter, Nick & Sarah).
I'm completely bored by the way that babies are continuously added to the story with the aim to create more drama. There was no need for Sarah being pregnant with Billy, and there was also very little point to most of the other babies born.
Think of something more original writers.
Once the pregnancy is over (and no-doubt another "Who's the father?" storyline) all we will be left with is a middle-aged single-mother. Eileen's character will become very limited, much more limited than it is already.
I wish the Coronation Street writers would stop using pregnancy as a shock tactic - there are plenty of other things they could do with Eileen, which I would find much more interesting.
Do you know that since 1990 there have been 18 births on Coronation Street and only 6 of those children still appear on the show? To my mind that's utterly ridiculous. Compare this with the 7...yes 7 births between 1960 & 1989 and it may become apparent how dependent Coronation Street has become on births and pregnancies. Of the 7 children born between those dates, 4 have been regular characters within the past 2 years (Tracy, Peter, Nick & Sarah).
I'm completely bored by the way that babies are continuously added to the story with the aim to create more drama. There was no need for Sarah being pregnant with Billy, and there was also very little point to most of the other babies born.
Think of something more original writers.
Originally Posted by Benc533:
“Think of something more original writers.”
“Think of something more original writers.”
Thats the problem Corrie can't I'm all for an older woman having a baby look a Pauline in eastenders that was done good but I dont think corrie have picked the write person.
Yeah but that is what she always says and it usally turns out to be true!
But i really hope this one is not I have such a bad feeling about this story.
But i really hope this one is not I have such a bad feeling about this story.
Originally Posted by Loopy Lisa Chez:
“Yeah but that is what she always says and it usally turns out to be true!
But i really hope this one is not I have such a bad feeling about this story.”
“Yeah but that is what she always says and it usally turns out to be true!
But i really hope this one is not I have such a bad feeling about this story.”
Ohhh! I dunno, I just can't see it happening if you get me? I think it could be good! But as Ben said, after we wouldn't see much of her after that and Sue Cleaver is great!
Could go either way really!
1 of 2
