Unless I'm mistaken the Hollyoaks scriptwriters have changed history slightly with this storyline!

Hollyoaks is 10years old next year (2005) and the Dawn/Jack baby storyline probably happened a couple of years into the show. So there is no way that the child can now be about 16 (as she appears to be)

Do they think the viewers are stupid!?

xxx

the child was already about 8 years old when Dawn first told Jambo, Jambo was shocked that Dawn could have mothered a child of that age. +10 years (give or take a year or so for in-accuracy on my part) and its about right, she would be about 16!

Yup, Gareth is right as far as I remember, too.

I remember Jambo being shocked when Dawn said the child was 8 (or whatever! Something like that) years old, as he thought Dawn was a couple of years younger than she was and so had the child when very young- she was in fact a few years older than him.

The actress who plays Beth (Think thats her name) cannnot act! I just watch her and i'm totally embarrassed for her and the other actors doing scenes with her. She must be the most wooden and unconvincing actress on TV! Whats going on Hollyoaks??