I hope you stay and have a laugh with us on twitter. We can always talk about knobs seeing how its so classy.

I agree with you 100%, why does she have to cheapen herself like this?

Did you read the rest of that paragraph? She's giving her opinion on the relationship and coming from her point of view, it's obviously going to have things she felt went wrong with it.

Knowing what we know about Josie, I really don't think she's saying those things to slate John. I think she's explaining why that didn't work and why this does.

I'm sure people don't agree, but that's how I see it.

Just want to say I always buy the mags Josie and John are in but I won't be buying New tomorrow, I just don't see the point of the interview, it wasn't promoting anything and to me is the worst interview Josie has done by a mile, I not going to stop supporting Josie but just didn't get this interview, unfortuantly I think we are going to lose a lot of people from the thread tomorrow when they read it xx

LOL, you know that nothing on the internet is anonymous, right?

I dont expect her to be like the Queen, and she can at times be very funny but it is my opinion and SOME people shate it that she has crossed that fine line of good taste. I am sure she could have said the same things without slagging John and mentioning her blokes and Jeff's appendages.

So you know me then? You know my name and who I am?

Well said,

sorry I dont know who you are. I dont know who Wendy is. I dont know who Qwerty is. I dont know who PICKLES is/Pretty anonymous to me. I know what they want me to know.

You definately need to make that appointment.....that's how I see it.

Yes Josie hated being ignored, she said so herself. I do think ppl are over reacting to this article, Josie is not presenting the news she s on BB and bbots which is full of explicitness and now in these trashy mags, but hey its her choice and it pays the rent. Shes just saying what ppl want to read, if you dont like you dont have to read - simples.
I personally wouldnt buy the mag or anyone like it but some do and it makes shall we say " sensationalist reading". I think it would professionally for Josie, a good idea, if she wants to get into serious presenting to give these articles a miss and someone should advise her to do so but lets not take the moral high ground with John cause he s opted out, because he s no saint either as someone pointed out in their post a bit further back.

You have a right to that opinion. I see it differently and am just trying to explain why I see it that way.

BTW, I have contacts.

The thing is .......this is the place to air our feelings about both John and Josie ............good and bad .......tis life .................Feelings to Josie or about Josie ...... the same to me .......I have written many pieces to Josie here ....as if she could read them ...........it is my way .........I have wished them nothing but well ........and I say again....apprecation can be crtitcal analyis.........I have never used bad language or rudeness ever to discuss their behaviour .......but sometimes the truth as others see it can be tough to take................I respect your right to defend the way you see it ..........but I feel that my view is equally worthy of respect .............and that's my last on the matter .......we could banter words till worldsend and it will never change my view on your rights or my rights.

Holly Willoughby is on Celebrity Juice where they talk about penises, boobs, wanking and all sorts. Josie is never going to read the news why would she have to change her personality (which has always been a little crude and out there) ? The whole reason she gets work is based on that personality.

I know a lot of people don't like her mentioning John but it's her right. She was in the relationship, she had to experience the fall out and she should be allowed to express her feelings on the situation for as long as she feels necessary not when people who follow (or followed) her and John tell her it's enough.

Not slagging John were we reading the same mag

It takes all sorts to make the world go round. Different opinions, different standards, different sense of humours, different ideas of what is hate and love, differences in morals etc.
If people think Josie was hilarious and tasteful in her comments, great.
If people think she was a bit crass and trashy , great.
If people think she is just spouting without thinking , great.
However is there any need to come on to an overwhelmingly positive thread and argue, then rush back to another place to mock? Strange especially when I know most were posting on this thread with these people 8 month ago.
Yes this is hypocrtical of me as i have done the same of the JJAT when they slagged Josie in the past. Difference being I dont think we have accused Josie of illegal activities. We have simply disagreed and been disappointed in an article. Obviously this deserves mocking as we are obviously deluded in to not seeing the fantastic, roll on the floor, pee yourself laughing humour in telling the world , your sex habits .

That wasn't meant to be a negative post - not at all - I was saying that as in explaining why the interviews were getting worse!!

Don't get me wrong after that first Now interview I was soooo disappointed in John - until that is I picked the interview to bits - just as I've done now with this article!! I'm not taking the moral high ground at all - all I'm saying is this one was more explicit than any other I've heard from her - I'm looking to the future for Josie - when she's married with some kids how would she feel if her kids read this?

And I'm well aware John is no saint - tbh Josie was always slightly more my favourite as I liked her right from the beginning of BB.

In this article - I'm not saying she has changed - because we've heard stuff like this before - but in this one - it is commented on nearly all the way through and in more detail - that's all!!!

I said personal life. I dont think Holly mentions her husbamds dick on tv.
Of course she has a right to talk about him, never said she didnt but she is over him now , it didnt even happen, so why the need to tell us over and over he was a t**t?

No one said it was tasteful. I personally think it's the way she is, the way she has always been.

Well I should've gone off 2 hours ago, got the shop tomorrow. I bid you goodnight.


When I'll be back on...gawd knows! But I'll be interested to see if the thread's still here when I do.


Night.

Come on lighten up folks, everyones got a different opinion, I really didnt read the article as being a serious, literary piece honestly its not worth falling out over is it.

Only ever watched CJ the time Josie was on. Is HW talking about her husband/ex bf when she talks about all sorts. Just asking.

Very true Judy.

LOL, so my feelings on John are welcome here?

I'm pretty sure the posts I've seen tonight haven't been critical analysis of Josie, and I don't agree that it's appropriate in an AT. Positive and constructive? I think not.

She was asked questions she answered them all, you may not like her answers but that is not her fault, it is how she feels and as she was in the relationship with john, no one else but josie!

Magazines ask questions to cause a stir they, they edit interviews to cause more of a stir! It is the industry, no one would buy a magazine otherwise!

Most of the interview was about Josie, and how her life is now, they want to ask her about John as she was in the house and became a couple with him after big brother, but there will be a time when there are no more questions to be asked and maybe that is what josie is trying to do ? Get it all out of her system so she can and john can move on and be seperate people with seperate lives