• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Eastenders Kelly
**Brooke**
20-09-2004
I got an email saying that in a few months Kelly will come back and hse's heavily pregnant with spencers baby... any truth in this?
chocopop
20-09-2004
I hope so. Kelly and the actress that plays her are FAB
WalfordWill
20-09-2004
I'd love to see Kelly back but not as a mother to that dope Spencer's baby.
**Brooke**
20-09-2004
Why get rid of her in the first place and bring in someone boring like Jane!!! It just doesn't make any sense! Kelly was fun and she added a bit of sexiness to the soap!
Lemonade
20-09-2004
looks all funny! .
jamesrlaming
20-09-2004
janes a good character- added some sense to the soap, but getting rid of kelly has nothing to do with jane.
Kelly was a good character and brooke kinsella is a fab actress, bringing her back would be a good move for the soap.
Lippincote
20-09-2004
Why would they bother to bring her back? Don't get me wrong, I loved her, but she had s*d all to do during the last year, the storyliners seemed to completely lose interest in her. Her and Spencer had to be the most unconvincing couple in a soap EVER - he's such a wimbly halfwit, why would be look at him twice.
Garbage
20-09-2004
I don't think she was that great a character.. No major objection to her though. Brooke can certainly act, and EE could always do with more capable actors.. As for her having Spence's baby.... No! It was a horrifying enough thought at the time that Vicky came so close to bringing a mini-spencer into the square.. If he had a sprog, then there's every chance his character would be kept around longer. No thanks..
WalfordWill
20-09-2004
Exactly, we don't need to go making reasons for Spencer to feel like he should stick around lol
juliebaird
21-09-2004
Should have kept her in an got rid of Zoe
Jumpy
21-09-2004
Originally Posted by juliebaird:
“Should have kept her in an got rid of Zoe ”

I thought this. I can see Zoe becoming the local bike! Kelly should come back and beg for Spencer's forgiveness for which he just can'r handle and leaves before having a mental break down. I don't mind Spencer too much, I don't hate him as much as the rest of you do!
HotCrossBun
21-09-2004
I think they got rid of Kelly because she was holding back the charatcer of Zoe, i.e. as Zoe was the only person she really associated with.
Code Y
21-09-2004
Originally Posted by HotCrossBun:
“I think they got rid of Kelly because she was holding back the charatcer of Zoe, i.e. as Zoe was the only person she really associated with.”

I would say vice versa; it’s Zoe’s character holding back Kelly's.

In recent months Zoe's character has been resigned to hanging around Dennis like some lost, love struck puppy' - not very enthralling viewing in my eyes *Double Yawn*.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map