• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 26)
<<
<
106 of 117
>>
>
RandomPoster
31-10-2011
Just checked an This Saturday's TXF was only a bit down from 2009's 10.3 million wasn't it?
But that was actually on 31st of October so.....
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“
And on Saturday, Strictly's extraordinary win over X Factor:

Source: http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/rating...033941.article”

Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Wow, SCD beat TXF by THREE MILLION during the clash!!


How unfortunate that todays overnights have been delayed so the ITV spin machine cant leap into action. I'm sure it will later though!”

You said it Robbie. Three million ahead in a 10 minute clash. Bloody hell. I thought a shorter overlap would have helped The X Factor more. Well no clash this weekend so The X Factor should do better.
derek500
31-10-2011
From Attentional on Twitter

Quote:
“Audience swap: On Saturday 36.8% Share of #Strictly viewers watched #XFactor, but 42% Share of #XFactor viewers watched #Strictly.”

RandomPoster
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“You said it Robbie. Three million ahead in a 10 minute clash. Bloody hell. I thought a shorter overlap would have helped The X Factor more. Well no clash this weekend so The X Factor should do better.”

They did save Jason Donovan till last didn't they? If they put Audley Harrison on last it would have been a bit smaller gap I guess.
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by derek500:
“From Attentional on Twitter”

Now that Attentional stat is fascinating. And not what I was expecting.
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by RandomPoster:
“They did save Jason Donovan till last didn't they? If they put Audley Harrison on last it would have been a bit smaller gap I guess.”

Strictly have been very clever about their running order I have to say.
Mitch 123
31-10-2011
To be fair it is slightly unfair to compare the beginning of the X Factor with the end of Strictly. Who would sit through 90 minutes of a show and miss the last 10?
grahamzxy
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mitch 123:
“To be fair it is slightly unfair to compare the beginning of the X Factor with the end of Strictly. Who would sit through 90 minutes of a show and miss the last 10?”

If I was a fan of TXF or indeed any show I would want to see the start. I imagine a lot of TXF viewers watch SCD until TXF starts. Of course some viewers will stick with SCD until the credits roll.
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mitch 123:
“To be fair it is slightly unfair to compare the beginning of the X Factor with the end of Strictly. Who would sit through 90 minutes of a show and miss the last 10?”

Originally Posted by grahamzxy:
“If I was a fan of TXF or indeed any show I would want to see the start. I imagine a lot of TXF viewers watch SCD until TXF starts. Of course some viewers will stick with SCD until the credits roll.”

I'm with you. Personally when a show I like is starting I want to see it from the beginning.I see lots of comments on Twitter from people saying they're turning over because The X Factor is starting. Must be a bigger crossover audience than people realise.
AlexiR
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“Looking at Disney, Nickelodeon and to an extent Cartoon Network, they succeeded in creating shows that are not only watched but also have extentions with toys, clothing, music and it is something that The BBC and ITV should inspire, maybe teaming up with Disney or Nick to create a British iCarly or Hannah Montana and animation wise, there isn't much for older kids in the vein of Thundercats or Young Justice although those have the backing of Warner Bros who own these properties.

I'm surprised ITV never thought of reviving Thunderbirds either as a live action show or a CGI series, the film while awful did show the potential of how a CGI/Live action would work. The Avengers is another one but the right for that belong to Studiocanal.”

I've never quite understood why ITV in particular backed away from children's television quite as dramatically as they have because when you get it right (or even halfway right) it is potentially an absolute goldmine. The shows you mentioned all make millions from branded merchandise and at this point Doctor Who must be making a small fortune from its merchandise. I've also never really understood why we haven't seen more British animation particularly in light of the fact that shows like The Simpsons and Family Guy have been very successful in the UK and again have huge potential for merchandising. If BBC3 does lose Family Guy then they could do worse than commission an original British animated comedy and try it in the same slot. If they were smart they'd have done that already and used Family Guy to launch it.

Originally Posted by Cent:
“Mobbed deserved more - fantastic show. Would work well on Saturday nights over here.”

Didn't ITV already try a very similar show to this in primetime Saturday night a few years ago? I want to say Phillip Schofield presented it but I cannot for the life of me remember what it was called. It bombed though and got pulled (from primetime at least) very quickly.

I'm not sure its a show that works as a regular series though. Fox seem to have the right idea with it in the US running it as a series of specials across the year rather than a weekly series. That also allows for much bigger scale than you'd be able to get from a weekly series.

Originally Posted by derek500:
“From Attentional on Twitter...”

That's a very interesting stat.

Originally Posted by grahamzxy:
“If I was a fan of TXF or indeed any show I would want to see the start. I imagine a lot of TXF viewers watch SCD until TXF starts. Of course some viewers will stick with SCD until the credits roll.”

In fairness very little actually happens during the first 10 minutes of The X Factor. Its basically just the inflated 'biggest. week. ever' video and then introduction of the judges and then the VT for the first act so I'm not surprised people weren't manically switching over at 8PM on the dot.

I do wonder if it might help the production team to switch up their running order a little more on the Saturday show and play around with the timing and structure. Right now I feel like I could probably flick onto ITV just as each performance starts and miss the VT's, awkward Dermot interviews and ad breaks without too much trouble or effort.
Saturn
31-10-2011
I'm sure everyone who has sky+ does what I do and watch SCD until it ends and then watch X Factor (fastforwarding through the intro, ads and most of the VTs until I have caught up with real time).
Saturn
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by derek500:
“From Attentional on Twitter”

I don't understand the point of that statistic. Surely the people that watch both are the same group of people whichever way you look at it. Therefore the show that gets the most overall viewers would automatically record the lower percentage of crossover?
Dancc
31-10-2011
Before the live boxing on Saturday 12th, C5 are showing The Great Escape across 3.5 hours of primetime.

That should rate well. According to my listings data, this classic film has not been shown on terrestrial TV since at least December 2009. Before that it used to be a regular on BBC Two over the Christmas holidays. I can't remember the last time it was shown on commercial TV, must be yonks.
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Saturn:
“I'm sure everyone who has sky+ does what I do and watch SCD until it ends and then watch X Factor (fastforwarding through the intro, ads and most of the VTs until I have caught up with real time).”

I think some people start Strictly 20 minutes in to fast forward through Bruce's links too.
Mike Teevee
31-10-2011
I like to keep you guys waiting

anyhoo data for w/e 23rd October 2011 is now available on BARB website

enjoy!
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mike Teevee:
“I like to keep you guys waiting

anyhoo data for w/e 23rd October 2011 is now available on BARB website

enjoy!”

Hello Mike

What is The X Factor's rating for October 22nd including HD & +1?
Mike Teevee
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Hello Mike

What is The X Factor's rating for October 22nd including HD & +1?”

lazy me says, check this report

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weekly-top-programmes?
Dancc
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mike Teevee:
“I like to keep you guys waiting

anyhoo data for w/e 23rd October 2011 is now available on BARB website

enjoy!”

Strong week for Channel 5. Highlights:

* Only broadcaster out of the main 5 channels to not lose audience share year-on-year, holding firm at 4.6%.
* 8 unique programmes topped the 1.5m mark, with The Bachelor adding 210k on timeshift to hit a series high for its semi-final.
* Highland Emergency hit a series high 1.1m, becoming the highest rating 7.30 programme on Channel 5 this year.
* Alphas series premiere topped 650k including +1 on 5* to become the channel's highest rating non-soap programme ever.
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mike Teevee:
“lazy me says, check this report

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weekly-top-programmes?”

Perfect. That's the bit I was looking for.

But do we include +1 & HD for ITV shows? I always get confused there.
Jimbowe
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mike Teevee:
“I like to keep you guys waiting

anyhoo data for w/e 23rd October 2011 is now available on BARB website

enjoy!”

Mike

When are the figures for ITV HD going to be incorporated in ITV1 just like BARB does for BBC1?
Mike Teevee
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Jimbowe:
“Mike

When are the figures for ITV HD going to be incorporated in ITV1 just like BARB does for BBC1?”

I don't think they will be, as they get pretty strong figures for the separate channel

I think the incorporated channel BBC1, Channel 4, Channel 5, ITV2 et al have done so because their respective HD channel figures are so low
Dancc
31-10-2011
Very strong week for Hollyoaks on E4...

1 HOLLYOAKS (MON 1900) 922k
2 HOLLYOAKS (WED 1900) 834k
3 HOLLYOAKS (TUE 1900) 825k
4 HOLLYOAKS (FRI 1900) 736k
5 HOLLYOAKS (THU 1901) 704k

The above figures compare very favourably to the same week in 2010 where only one episode made E4's top 10 with 427k. For a higher rating equivalent week you have to go back to w/c October 20 2008:

1 HOLLYOAKS (Mon 18:59) 1.182m
2 HOLLYOAKS (Tue 19:00) 1,116m
3 HOLLYOAKS (Wed 18:59) 1.039m
4 HOLLYOAKS (Thu 18:59) 826k
5 HOLLYOAKS (Fri 19:00) 704k

Source: BARB.
cylon6
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Jimbowe:
“Mike

When are the figures for ITV HD going to be incorporated in ITV1 just like BARB does for BBC1?”

Originally Posted by Mike Teevee:
“I don't think they will be, as they get pretty strong figures for the separate channel

I think the incorporated channel BBC1, Channel 4, Channel 5, ITV2 et al have done so because their respective HD channel figures are so low”

I think it makes sense for HD to be included. It's not like it's a different schedule. And as I said before when Strictly beats The X Factor in consolidated ratings we can say the tide is turning. The Sunday results show for The X Factor still rates very highly. Strictly never timeshifts as high as The X Factor.
dave01
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by Mike Teevee:
“I don't think they will be, as they get pretty strong figures for the separate channel

I think the incorporated channel BBC1, Channel 4, Channel 5, ITV2 et al have done so because their respective HD channel figures are so low”

RZT and TrickyTree explained recently that ITV1 HD and ITV1 ratings are separated by BARB, because the channels have different regional variants. The two cannot ever be added together by BARB until ITV1 HD has the same regional variants as ITV1. This is because advertisers would be paying for the wrong viewership in each region.

For the BBC, they are not commercial so they can add the HD viewers in.
Dancc
31-10-2011
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“I think it makes sense for HD to be included. It's not like it's a different schedule.”

This topic has been addressed before. See below why the above is not possible:

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...postcount=1701
<<
<
106 of 117
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map