• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 26)
<<
<
23 of 117
>>
>
Samthefootball
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Of course not. More a sign of the times.”

I'm Sorry what do you mean it's a sign of times. A Sign that papers won't write about X Factor and it will get lower and lower or a sign that it will do a Strictly and get 8-9m without all the press writeup
Dancc
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“That would suit me! ”

Have you noticed Yesterday are repeating Last of the Summer Wine on Sundays nights, Pizza?

I seem to recall that being a personal favourite of yours.
Glenn A
16-10-2011
It does seem judging by ratings that people want entertainment. The top three shows this year- SCD, TXF, BGT_are all entertainment shows and the soaps aren't such big hitters as they were a few years ago. I think, just as in the harsh economic climate of the seventies, people want programmes to cheer them up not depress them like Eastenders. I would say now is the right time for a comedy revival.
As for ITV's track records in sitcoms, there were some real horrors in the Monday sitcom slot, but they also had some huge hits in the seventies and eighties like On The Buses and Duty Free.
Fudd
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Of course not. More a sign of the times.”

Sign of the current feeling certainly. I think once Russell goes the show may lose some momentum. I've watched it from the start and I'm finding it a chore at the moment...but it seems to be attracting casual viewers.

On the other hand I'm enjoying The X Factor (which is not as reliant on one contestant as Strictly IMO) more this year yet the casual viewers tend to be tuning out.

I like going against the grain.
Fudd
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by mlt11:
“Of course all of the rules restricting adverts and product placement make it harder for FTA commercial channels to earn revenue which in turn makes it harder for them to compete (against both the BBC and Pay channels) which in turn leads to weaker FTA commercial channels and a stronger Pay TV sector.

We've already seen this with sport - compare the amount of top sport FTA in the UK compared to the US.

The question now is whether we are going to start seeing similar trends in more general programming. It's looking pretty likely.”

I can just see The Sun pitching a fit and telling viewers what a bad move all out product placement would be if it happens.

The Daily Star will say it's brilliant, though.

Not due to personal interest at all, of course...
Andy23
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Some more ratings from last night:

Channel 5
21:55- Big Brother: 886k (4.6%)”

Ouch, Channel 5 should maybe consider pulling the Saturday editions. How may weeks are left of this expensive flop?

Maybe it is low because Desmond & his papers have turned their attention to trying to flog the Health Lottery instead of going on about Big Brother all the time.
Dancc
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“I'm Sorry what do you mean it's a sign of times. A Sign that papers won't write about X Factor and it will get lower and lower or a sign that it will do a Strictly and get 8-9m without all the press writeup”

I just think it's interesting that's all.

This time last year the tabloids were all over X Factor. Every week there was some sort of scandal of controversy dominating the front pages and taking up masses of column inches.

This year it's all very flat. The papers are clearly responding to the general apathy towards the current series.
Fudd
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“I just think it's interesting that's all.

This time last year the tabloids were all over X Factor. Every week there was some sort of scandal of controversy dominating the front pages and taking up masses of column inches.

This year it's all very flat. The papers are clearly responding to the general apathy towards the current series.”

They don't have the controversial edge this year...I guess that's why they wanted Goldie but I'm glad she pulled out.

I honestly thought they would've got Gamu to audition again this year, but maybe that'll be next time round...especially if Cheryl returns!
Pizzatheaction
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Have you noticed Yesterday are repeating Last of the Summer Wine on Sundays nights, Pizza?

I seem to recall that being a personal favourite of yours. ”

Yep. They had a little dabble in the summer, and now they're repeating more noughties episodes at weekends, and they're repeating it from the pilot episode on weeknights.

Just as well, because I doubt BBC One will ever repeat another episode of Summer Wine (or My Family).
Samthefootball
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“They don't have the controversial edge this year...I guess that's why they wanted Goldie but I'm glad she pulled out.

I honestly thought they would've got Gamu to audition again this year, but maybe that'll be next time round...especially if Cheryl returns!”

I Do think She will return next year. There is somthing about her that the press love so that would probally get the ratings up. I also think Danni will judge Britain's got talent
Dancc
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“Yep. They had a little dabble in the summer, and now they're repeating more noughties episodes at weekends, and they're repeating it from the pilot episode on weeknights.

Just as well, because I doubt BBC One will ever repeat another episode of Summer Wine (or My Family). ”

You're probably right about LOTSW. I wouldn't be surprised to see My Family pop up at Christmas however in an afternoon slot.
Glenn A
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“I just think it's interesting that's all.

This time last year the tabloids were all over X Factor. Every week there was some sort of scandal of controversy dominating the front pages and taking up masses of column inches.

This year it's all very flat. The papers are clearly responding to the general apathy towards the current series.”

I was reading the Sunday Mirror in the pub a month ago and their critic really savaged The X Factor. However, it still does well in the ratings and the Daily Star seems to feature it on its front page most days.
grahamzxy
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“It does seem judging by ratings that people want entertainment. The top three shows this year- SCD, TXF, BGT_are all entertainment shows and the soaps aren't such big hitters as they were a few years ago. I think, just as in the harsh economic climate of the seventies, people want programmes to cheer them up not depress them like Eastenders. I would say now is the right time for a comedy revival.
As for ITV's track records in sitcoms, there were some real horrors in the Monday sitcom slot, but they also had some huge hits in the seventies and eighties like On The Buses and Duty Free.”

EE timeshifts equal to SCD (well it did on barb figures w/e 2/10/11) CS, DM & DA timeshift above 9m/9m/10m respectively. Some viewers wants live family entertainment, others want quality drama and some want regular soap episodes 52 weeks of the year. It is best for viewers to have variety - some viewers will totally avoid certain programmes. If a show has high production values and general appeal the viewers will tune in.

ITV1 comedy has really hit the buffers, if only they could remake something similar to Rising Damp, Duty Free could easily be retweaked, shows in the 70's 80's had a captive audience - only 3 channels up to Nov 1982, there was literally nothing to do in the late 70's except watch tv. The fact that a tv show can even approach 10m viewers in 2011 is amazing. Not many shows in the US can get near a 10% share of the population watching (TXF USA is getting around 3.5% for comparison). Some shows here can score 20%+ population share. 10m viewers here would be approximately 16.7% population share.
Samthefootball
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“I was reading the Sunday Mirror in the pub a month ago and their critic really savaged The X Factor. However, it still does well in the ratings and the Daily Star seems to feature it on its front page most days.”

I know alot of people thought all the controversy was good for the show but maybe it did put people off. Now i now Strictly is a different show to X Factor but that doesn't need all of this controversy to get big ratings.
Agent F
16-10-2011
X Factor's supposed 'fall from grace' sounds like wishful thinking to me.
Andy23
16-10-2011
LOL people complain when The X Factor is all over the papers, blaming ITV for feeding them stories all the time, saying how the programme is annoying because it's in your face even if you don't watch it, and now people are complaining that the programme isn't in the papers enough. You can't have it both ways.
Dancc
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“I was reading the Sunday Mirror in the pub a month ago and their critic really savaged The X Factor. However, it still does well in the ratings and the Daily Star seems to feature it on its front page most days.”

Kevin O'Sullivan was equally savage this week:

Quote:
“The X Factor’s seen-it-all-before mediocre live shows trundle on amid widespread national apathy.

The no-mark finalists are all heading in one direction... back to obscurity.

But some of us were ready to back super singer Amelia Lily all the way... until mixed-message judge Kelly Rowland’s baffling decision to kick her out in the senselessly cruel slaughter of the quarter.

Kelly... she could have won!

But nice of caring Tulisa to assure reject duo Two Shoes: “I swear I’m going to stay in touch.”

Sure you will.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv-entertain...vin-osullivan/
Fudd
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“I know alot of people thought all the controversy was good for the show but maybe it did put people off. Now i now Strictly is a different show to X Factor but that doesn't need all of this controversy to get big ratings.”

It appears the 'joke' acts work well though...Ann Widdecombe/Nancy Del'ollio/Russell Grant (though he can dance...sort of) - Chris Parker really kicked off the franchise because he was so dire yet finished second.

It's the same with The X Factor - the show really started snowballing with Jedward and Wagner kept it going. That's why the producers are trying to turn Johnny into the joke act but he can sing, so they're finding it difficult and I think they may abandon the idea and take the subsequent hit.
Score
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“X Factor's supposed 'fall from grace' sounds like wishful thinking to me. ”



For all the XF vs Strictly comparisons, it's worth noting that both shows are down year-on-year so far. TXF is down -6% (11.0m vs 11.6m) on where it was at this stage last year, and Strictly is down -5% (8.6m vs 9.1m) So the declines are actually pretty similar (although they'll probably get slightly further apart as we approach Xmas) and both are still doing really well.
Dancc
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“LOL people complain when The X Factor is all over the papers, blaming ITV for feeding them stories all the time, saying how the programme is annoying because it's in your face even if you don't watch it, and now people are complaining that the programme isn't in the papers enough. You can't have it both ways.”

Hey, I'm not complaining. I think it's great to see the return of news on the newspaper front pages. About time Fleet Street cut down on this lazy 'journalism' every weekend.
Fudd
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Kevin O'Sullivan was equally savage this week:



http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv-entertain...vin-osullivan/”

You avoided the savage treatment of Strictly then?

Quote:
“Italian civil war as furious Nancy Dell’Olio threatened to sue *barmy Bruno Tonioli for suggesting she was staggering around like she’d “inhaled” two gallons of *champagne.

Outrageous! She wasn’t rubbish because she was drunk. She was rubbish because she was injured. Bad leg. Not legless.

Strictly Come *Dancing, week three... and if SIR Brucie is right that this is “the best-ever line-up” why are the ratings so *lacklustre?

Maybe ballroom *fatigue is setting in. The Beeb’s annual jigathon is exactly the same year after repetitive year. Groundhog Day.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv-entertain...vin-osullivan/
RobbieSykes123
16-10-2011
I was reading an interview with Noel Gallagher in The Times yesterday - apparently, Cowell asked him to be his replacement on TXF before turning to Gary Barlow. Worryingly, it sounds like The Chief was considering it too - but it was learning about the "judges' houses" round which meant he would have to "have a fat lass from Bradford standing in me daffodils singing Flying Without Wings" that put him off.

Apparently his 11 year old daughter has disowned him though.

Could have been interesting from a ratings perspective. Might have brought some fans of credible, proper, non-manufactured, "hard graft" music to the show.

Hell, even I might have tuned in...
Andy23
16-10-2011
There isn't really any point using TV critics as a benchmark, there will be at least one slating all the biggest programmes every week.
Fudd
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Score:
“

For all the XF vs Strictly comparisons, it's worth noting that both shows are down year-on-year so far. TXF is down -6% (11.0m vs 11.6m) on where it was at this stage last year, and Strictly is down -5% (8.6m vs 9.1m) So the declines are actually pretty similar (although they'll probably get slightly further apart as we approach Xmas) and both are still doing really well.”

The strange thing is Strictly's decline is being glossed over (bar by Kevin O'Sullivan) completely, simply because The X Factor is down as well. I'm not saying Strictly's decline is awful - it isn't - but it's only 1% better off than The X Factor's.
Agent F
16-10-2011
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“There isn't really any point using TV critics as a benchmark, there will be at least one slating all the biggest programmes every week.”

Indeed. Kevin is paid to be 'savage', it's very rare that he will print a positive review, and when he does it's usually tucked away. He hasn't been very kind about Strictly either - it's his job.
<<
<
23 of 117
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map