That is a bit unfair Osasuna - Lisa was blatently overmarked and her overmarking was what did for Austin in the quarters

Since when have "lines" been non technical? since when has "musicality" been non technical or are you an expert at splitting a beat when required

The lady was/is a class act technically and specifically in music interpretation in the ballroom dances (difficult technically)
Ps There has never been better female footwork in ballroom

I thought Lisa's ballroom was quite good, but her latin really let her down.

Austin was the better dancer in that series in my opinion.

I always seem to disagree with people about who should've won various series, but I totally agree that Tom was a really talented, well-showcased dancer and he won partly 'cos of his ability and partly 'cos of Camilla's good choreography.

I liked Rachel Stevens too, but I honestly don't think she was as good as Tom.

Also, I never found him arrogant: just nice and a good dancer.

It's the same with Matt and Kara from last year - I liked them both, bu supported Matt. Everyone else in the world shouts me down and insists Kara was better, but I thought they were pretty evenly matched and either one could have won it.

Totally agree with Mr. Incredible - Tom Chambers could have won an Olympic medal from arrogance and smugness...couldn't stand him!! Camilla came accross as such a desperate individual too,

Tom Chambers arrived almost fully formed and hardly improved through the series at all ho hum.