Originally Posted by Rich2k:
“Not at all.... read the title of the patent
note the UNLOCK image part, I see no unlock IMAGE part on that demo
Note that it also says
So it requires firstly an unlock image and secondly the image must be defined along with the gesture.
Wording of patents is very important. You can't pick and choose parts of it, all conditions must be met. The patent isn't granted purely on gestures, it includes a number of conditions.”
“Not at all.... read the title of the patent
note the UNLOCK image part, I see no unlock IMAGE part on that demo
Note that it also says
So it requires firstly an unlock image and secondly the image must be defined along with the gesture.
Wording of patents is very important. You can't pick and choose parts of it, all conditions must be met. The patent isn't granted purely on gestures, it includes a number of conditions.”
If you want to get picky, then the purple square on the screen is the image.
Like I said earlier, at least a judge in the Holland was sensible enough to see that the patent was invalid. Thus from a legal stand point in Holland (and thus probably Europe) the patent is not valid. You also have to take into account that a patent also implies that a person would not be able to figure out the gesture on their own and the 'prior art' does not exist. In both these instances the patent fails.




”